Comments on: Citigroup a ‘Black Hole’ that Requires Nationalization

By: Jefegeuse

Jefegeuse — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:56:12 +0000

Your recap of Shedlock's position is completely false. He absolutely and resolutely opposes nationalization, but points out that it is likely to happen anyway thanks to false economic pretenses by our political, academic, and media leaders. He names these questions knowing that the right answers are impossible for Geithner, Bernanke, and Krugman to honestly find if they wish to nationalize. Shedlock's position on nationalization is quoted above in his last sentence, but it seems you missed it.

By: Delia X

Delia X — Fri, 01 May 2009 06:24:01 +0000

With all the problems, confusions, and wearies in the investment world and investing your moneyChoose your investment wisely, as there are some stocks that don't make for as good an investment as you might think. The Forbes list of those exact investments has come out, and the list isn't exactly a shocker. AIG, Citigroup, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and GM are the stocks losing money at a frantic pace, and among them, GM is flirting with bankruptcy. This isn't a shocker, as every one of these megafirms is currently great troubled, and went crying to the government about how they lost all their money. Every firm on the list had to get a personal loan from the taxpayers. It's a subject of great speculation if we'll get a return on our investment.

By: Delia X

Delia X — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:24:01 +0000

By: Big Black Sticks In Little White Slits 3

Big Black Sticks In Little White Slits 3 — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:33:21 +0000

[...] The Washington Independent » Citigroup a ‘Black Hole’ that … [...]

By: U.S. May Invest More in Citigroup Bank | THE WEEKLY POINT

U.S. May Invest More in Citigroup Bank | THE WEEKLY POINT — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:00:54 +0000

[...] The Washington Independent » Citigroup a ‘Black Hole’ that Requires Nationalization Mary Kane [...]

By: Dan D.

Dan D. — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:34:39 +0000

Are we doing a good thing for the economy by trying to stabilize companies that are headed out of business because of their entanglement with the market and the number of jobs of that stand to be lost?

Are we postponing the inevitable? What if these companies go out of business despite the fact that the government has given billions of dollars in an effort to keep the companies going out of business? Where will be then if the government loses billions and all the jobs the government were trying to save are gone any way?

http://www.weeklypoint.com/2009/02/23/us-may-in...