<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treasury: Lending Down Among TARP Recipients</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/30509/treasury-lending-down-among-tarp-recipients/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30509/treasury-lending-down-among-tarp-recipients</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowboard Goggles</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30509/treasury-lending-down-among-tarp-recipients/comment-page-1#comment-24447</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowboard Goggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30509#comment-24447</guid>
		<description>interesting article, Nice topic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting article, Nice topic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jt</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30509/treasury-lending-down-among-tarp-recipients/comment-page-1#comment-18696</link>
		<dc:creator>jt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30509#comment-18696</guid>
		<description>The key graf is here: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Not that those banks have been particularly forthright about where the money’s going if not toward lending. In December, The Associated Press asked the 21 top TARP recipients to specify how they’re using the funds. The AP reported Tuesday: “None would provide any specifics.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact is, the banks&#039; balance sheets were a lot worse than they let on. They &lt;i&gt;couldn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; lend any more money or they&#039;d have to admit they were insolvent from carrying too many toxic assets on their books. So they just hoarded it instead and hoped no-one would notice. Geitner and the people at the Fed and Treasury recognized this, which is why we&#039;re on to Phase II: simply taking them over and unwinding their (mostly worthless) assets in an orderly, bankruptcy-like fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key graf is here: </p>
<p><i>Not that those banks have been particularly forthright about where the money’s going if not toward lending. In December, The Associated Press asked the 21 top TARP recipients to specify how they’re using the funds. The AP reported Tuesday: “None would provide any specifics.”</i></p>
<p>The fact is, the banks&#39; balance sheets were a lot worse than they let on. They <i>couldn&#39;t</i> lend any more money or they&#39;d have to admit they were insolvent from carrying too many toxic assets on their books. So they just hoarded it instead and hoped no-one would notice. Geitner and the people at the Fed and Treasury recognized this, which is why we&#39;re on to Phase II: simply taking them over and unwinding their (mostly worthless) assets in an orderly, bankruptcy-like fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Open Left: &#8220;Banks Not Using Bailout Money for It&#8217;s Stated Purpose&#8221; &#171; A New Way Forward on Economic Recovery</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30509/treasury-lending-down-among-tarp-recipients/comment-page-1#comment-18636</link>
		<dc:creator>From Open Left: &#8220;Banks Not Using Bailout Money for It&#8217;s Stated Purpose&#8221; &#171; A New Way Forward on Economic Recovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30509#comment-18636</guid>
		<description>[...] were told that bailout money was being given to banks so they could increase their lending? Yeah, that didn&#8217;t work out so well, according to the Treasury Department: Treasury: Lending Down Among TARP RecipientsA new report out of the Treasury Department Tuesday [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were told that bailout money was being given to banks so they could increase their lending? Yeah, that didn&#8217;t work out so well, according to the Treasury Department: Treasury: Lending Down Among TARP RecipientsA new report out of the Treasury Department Tuesday [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Mortgage Market Report as of February 18, 2009 &#124; Real Estate Market Reports</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30509/treasury-lending-down-among-tarp-recipients/comment-page-1#comment-18634</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Mortgage Market Report as of February 18, 2009 &#124; Real Estate Market Reports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30509#comment-18634</guid>
		<description>[...] $787 billion fiscal stimulus package, Obama is turning his attention to the housing market, where   Treasury: Lending Down Among TARP Recipients - washingtonindependent.com 02/18/2009 A new report out of the Treasury Department Tuesday [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $787 billion fiscal stimulus package, Obama is turning his attention to the housing market, where   Treasury: Lending Down Among TARP Recipients &#8211; washingtonindependent.com 02/18/2009 A new report out of the Treasury Department Tuesday [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. R. Masten</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30509/treasury-lending-down-among-tarp-recipients/comment-page-1#comment-18653</link>
		<dc:creator>E. R. Masten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30509#comment-18653</guid>
		<description>Your headline is misleading, and this is why the public becomes morose (and the Congress becomes even more rude than usual).  The entire financial industry came to a standstill in the beginning of the quarter for a myriad of reasons (all of which you are familiar with)... but the CONCLUSION of the report was &quot;In sum, loan activity was resilient in the face of the worst economic downturn in decades&quot;... and THAT you chose to ignore.  Yesterday, BofA made it&#039;s first dividend repayment on TARP funds... but you didn&#039;t note that either.  I&#039;m beginning to think that the press is like Limbaugh... that it&#039;s &quot;more interesting&quot; to say the worst...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your headline is misleading, and this is why the public becomes morose (and the Congress becomes even more rude than usual).  The entire financial industry came to a standstill in the beginning of the quarter for a myriad of reasons (all of which you are familiar with)&#8230; but the CONCLUSION of the report was &#8220;In sum, loan activity was resilient in the face of the worst economic downturn in decades&#8221;&#8230; and THAT you chose to ignore.  Yesterday, BofA made it&#39;s first dividend repayment on TARP funds&#8230; but you didn&#39;t note that either.  I&#39;m beginning to think that the press is like Limbaugh&#8230; that it&#39;s &#8220;more interesting&#8221; to say the worst&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

