<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Hope for Homeowners Hopeless?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:29:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: home_equity_loans</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-74610</link>
		<dc:creator>home_equity_loans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-74610</guid>
		<description>I have not much time, but I&#039;ve got many useful things here, love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not much time, but I&#39;ve got many useful things here, love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power Washing Virginia</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-35615</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Washing Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-35615</guid>
		<description>&quot;Taking a haircut&quot;? &lt;br&gt;With Federal Housing Authority it might take longer that one would expect. Now, the realization of the idea appeared to be also complicated with lots of issues involved. It doesn&#039;t sound that attractive any longer to homeowners  - and to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Taking a haircut&#8221;? <br />With Federal Housing Authority it might take longer that one would expect. Now, the realization of the idea appeared to be also complicated with lots of issues involved. It doesn&#39;t sound that attractive any longer to homeowners  &#8211; and to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power Washing Virginia</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-30339</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Washing Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-30339</guid>
		<description>&quot;Taking a haircut&quot;? &lt;br&gt;With Federal Housing Authority it might take longer that one would expect. Now, the realization of the idea appeared to be also complicated with lots of issues involved. It doesn&#039;t sound that attractive any longer to homeowners  - and to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Taking a haircut&#8221;? <br />With Federal Housing Authority it might take longer that one would expect. Now, the realization of the idea appeared to be also complicated with lots of issues involved. It doesn&#39;t sound that attractive any longer to homeowners  &#8211; and to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FHA Loans</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-30065</link>
		<dc:creator>FHA Loans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-30065</guid>
		<description>there is hope..... it is never hopeless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is hope&#8230;.. it is never hopeless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Senate Allow Banksters To Reap More Rewards? &#171; The Ice Blog</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-29196</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Senate Allow Banksters To Reap More Rewards? &#171; The Ice Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-29196</guid>
		<description>[...] far, all the foreclosure prevention plans that rely on voluntary participation from the banks have failed. If cramdown is removed from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] far, all the foreclosure prevention plans that rely on voluntary participation from the banks have failed. If cramdown is removed from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: america</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-26899</link>
		<dc:creator>america</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-26899</guid>
		<description>wellcome to SOCIALISM&gt;people just think help is coming,and it never does,because its impossible.this central government stuff has al-ready been tried,it is not new.look at any bankrupt liberal state,or any democratic ran longterm county.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wellcome to SOCIALISM&gt;people just think help is coming,and it never does,because its impossible.this central government stuff has al-ready been tried,it is not new.look at any bankrupt liberal state,or any democratic ran longterm county.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Earl Salmony</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-26271</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Earl Salmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-26271</guid>
		<description>Dear Friends,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps you can assist me. There must be something wrong with the “picture” I am about to draw, but no one with wealth, power, status, and privileges to conspicuously consume and endlessly hoard has said anything. Their bought-and-paid-for politicians and absurdly enriched minions in the mass media are also silent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Picture this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A remarkably tiny group of conniving, deceitful, ostentatiously greedy, patently fraudulent financial schemers on what is left of Wall Street in the remaining investment houses and the major {stress-tested} banks that are described as “too big to fail” are at one and the same time being given hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer money, racking up billions of dollars in profits, and paying themselves millions of dollars in bonuses. All the while, millions of people are losing their livelihoods, homes, pensions, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is wrong with this picture?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Friends,</p>
<p>Perhaps you can assist me. There must be something wrong with the “picture” I am about to draw, but no one with wealth, power, status, and privileges to conspicuously consume and endlessly hoard has said anything. Their bought-and-paid-for politicians and absurdly enriched minions in the mass media are also silent.</p>
<p>Picture this:</p>
<p>A remarkably tiny group of conniving, deceitful, ostentatiously greedy, patently fraudulent financial schemers on what is left of Wall Street in the remaining investment houses and the major {stress-tested} banks that are described as “too big to fail” are at one and the same time being given hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer money, racking up billions of dollars in profits, and paying themselves millions of dollars in bonuses. All the while, millions of people are losing their livelihoods, homes, pensions, etc.</p>
<p>What is wrong with this picture?</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget Magnus &#187; Hope, and Wishful Thinking</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-23450</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Magnus &#187; Hope, and Wishful Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-23450</guid>
		<description>[...] full month ago the Hope for Homeowners plan was declared &#8220;hopeless&#8220;, pointing out that the program designed to help 400,000 homeowners by now had closed a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] full month ago the Hope for Homeowners plan was declared &#8220;hopeless&#8220;, pointing out that the program designed to help 400,000 homeowners by now had closed a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suburban Guerrilla &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bush &#8216;Hope for Homeowners&#8217; Plan? Hopeless</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-23263</link>
		<dc:creator>Suburban Guerrilla &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bush &#8216;Hope for Homeowners&#8217; Plan? Hopeless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-23263</guid>
		<description>[...] GOP tradition of giving misleading names to programs, this one was a standout. BushCo didn&#8217;t do anything right, did they? It seemed like a good idea at the time. Last October, the Bush administration unveiled a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GOP tradition of giving misleading names to programs, this one was a standout. BushCo didn&#8217;t do anything right, did they? It seemed like a good idea at the time. Last October, the Bush administration unveiled a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jt</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/30192/is-hope-for-homeowners-hopeless/comment-page-1#comment-22963</link>
		<dc:creator>jt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=30192#comment-22963</guid>
		<description>When I looked into this program last year for my house, it was a long and costly process and I wish someone, either on my lender servicer&#039;s end and/or FHA, would have been upfront about the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Lender participation in the program was voluntary. The people at FHA acted like getting approved for a loan mod was a totally foregone conclusion because this was a government program and wrote up a loan for me and told me to go out and get my home reappraised to the tune of $450 and my lender would take care of the rest! As it turned out...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Nobody was participating in the program, most notably Fannie Mae, who owned my loan, so all my work (and $$) was for naught. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. My loan servicer was utterly clueless about the whole process and I ended up having to talk to supervisor after supervisor until one finally leveled with me: your lender is not participating in the HFH program, you wasted your money on a reappraisal, and there is _no_ chance your loan will be refinanced or altered unless you&#039;re deep in foreclosure and even then we&#039;d probably just let you hang. Good day. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus far, my efforts to sound out a refi with my servicer based on the NEW program, which Fannie Mae _is_ supposedly participating in, has produced the following result: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nobody, anywhere, at Fannie Mae or my loan servicer, has any idea what&#039;s in the program, whether I qualify, how I can apply, or what the hell is going on. I&#039;m not kidding. They literally told me that have no idea whether Fannie Mae is going to be restructuring any mortgages or not. No clue. So I&#039;m very positive about how this will work out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I looked into this program last year for my house, it was a long and costly process and I wish someone, either on my lender servicer&#39;s end and/or FHA, would have been upfront about the following:</p>
<p>1. Lender participation in the program was voluntary. The people at FHA acted like getting approved for a loan mod was a totally foregone conclusion because this was a government program and wrote up a loan for me and told me to go out and get my home reappraised to the tune of $450 and my lender would take care of the rest! As it turned out&#8230;</p>
<p>2. Nobody was participating in the program, most notably Fannie Mae, who owned my loan, so all my work (and $$) was for naught. </p>
<p>3. My loan servicer was utterly clueless about the whole process and I ended up having to talk to supervisor after supervisor until one finally leveled with me: your lender is not participating in the HFH program, you wasted your money on a reappraisal, and there is _no_ chance your loan will be refinanced or altered unless you&#39;re deep in foreclosure and even then we&#39;d probably just let you hang. Good day. </p>
<p>Thus far, my efforts to sound out a refi with my servicer based on the NEW program, which Fannie Mae _is_ supposedly participating in, has produced the following result: </p>
<p>Nobody, anywhere, at Fannie Mae or my loan servicer, has any idea what&#39;s in the program, whether I qualify, how I can apply, or what the hell is going on. I&#39;m not kidding. They literally told me that have no idea whether Fannie Mae is going to be restructuring any mortgages or not. No clue. So I&#39;m very positive about how this will work out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
