Comments on: Publisher that Owns Credit Rating Agency Kills Book Critical of … Ratings Agencies http://washingtonindependent.com/29809/publisher-that-owns-rating-agency-kills-book-critical-of-ratings-agencies National News in Context Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Credit agencies | Credit Blog http://washingtonindependent.com/29809/publisher-that-owns-rating-agency-kills-book-critical-of-ratings-agencies/comment-page-1#comment-18453 Credit agencies | Credit Blog Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:10:14 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=29809#comment-18453 [...]  Publisher that Owns Credit Rating Agency Kills Book Critical of … Ratings AgenciesPosted by ladinah via The Washington Independent   [...] [...]  Publisher that Owns Credit Rating Agency Kills Book Critical of … Ratings AgenciesPosted by ladinah via The Washington Independent   [...]

]]> By: Barry Ritholtz http://washingtonindependent.com/29809/publisher-that-owns-rating-agency-kills-book-critical-of-ratings-agencies/comment-page-1#comment-38030 Barry Ritholtz Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:27:29 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=29809#comment-38030 It was absurd of their flak to claim this was a matter of sourcing or footnotes. <br><br>All of the submitted manuscript footnotes are here: <br>Endnotes/Sources <br><a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/endnotessources/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/endnotesso...</a><br><br>As you can see, they are all eithe rbooks or recent major media articles, cited along with their URL. Verifying any of these things is a snap.<br> <br>Then, there is the 90 additional pages of sources that the publisher asked me to pull as it was "redundant" and made the book "too thick." It was absurd of their flak to claim this was a matter of sourcing or footnotes.

All of the submitted manuscript footnotes are here:
Endnotes/Sources
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/endnotesso…

As you can see, they are all eithe rbooks or recent major media articles, cited along with their URL. Verifying any of these things is a snap.

Then, there is the 90 additional pages of sources that the publisher asked me to pull as it was “redundant” and made the book “too thick.”

]]> By: About Bailout Nation . . . | The Big Picture http://washingtonindependent.com/29809/publisher-that-owns-rating-agency-kills-book-critical-of-ratings-agencies/comment-page-1#comment-18109 About Bailout Nation . . . | The Big Picture Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:19:50 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=29809#comment-18109 [...] Publisher that Owns Credit Rating Agency Kills Book Critical of … Ratings Agencies Mary Kane 2/11/09 9:10 AM http://washingtonindependent.com/29809/publisher-that-owns-rating-agency-kills-book-critical-of-ratings-agencies [...] [...] Publisher that Owns Credit Rating Agency Kills Book Critical of … Ratings Agencies Mary Kane 2/11/09 9:10 AM http://washingtonindependent.com/29809/publisher-that-owns-rating-agency-kills-book-critical-of-ratings-agencies [...]

]]> By: Barry Ritholtz http://washingtonindependent.com/29809/publisher-that-owns-rating-agency-kills-book-critical-of-ratings-agencies/comment-page-1#comment-18111 Barry Ritholtz Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:27:29 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=29809#comment-18111 It was absurd of their flak to claim this was a matter of sourcing or footnotes. <br><br>All of the submitted manuscript footnotes are here: <br>Endnotes/Sources <br><a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/endnotessources/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/endnotesso...</a><br><br>As you can see, they are all eithe rbooks or recent major media articles, cited along with their URL. Verifying any of these things is a snap.<br> <br>Then, there is the 90 additional pages of sources that the publisher asked me to pull as it was "redundant" and made the book "too thick." It was absurd of their flak to claim this was a matter of sourcing or footnotes.

All of the submitted manuscript footnotes are here:
Endnotes/Sources
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/endnotesso…

As you can see, they are all eithe rbooks or recent major media articles, cited along with their URL. Verifying any of these things is a snap.

Then, there is the 90 additional pages of sources that the publisher asked me to pull as it was “redundant” and made the book “too thick.”

]]>