Comments on: Bipartisan Advocacy Group Urges Holder to Change Position on State Secrets

By: Jeremiah of Austin

Jeremiah of Austin — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:41:39 +0000

Meanwhile, none of that had anything to do with state secrets and torture. When you wingnuts leave America and move to Belarus or someplace where you'll have the sort of tyranny you want for America?

By: Jeremiah of Austin

Jeremiah of Austin — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:41:39 +0000

Meanwhile, none of that had anything to do with state secrets and torture. When you wingnuts leave America and move to Belarus or someplace where you'll have the sort of tyranny you want for America?

By: Panetta: No prosecution for CIA interrogators | Digg PhotoBlog

Panetta: No prosecution for CIA interrogators | Digg PhotoBlog — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 08:19:06 +0000

[...] Bipartisan Advocacy Group Urges Holder to Change Position on State … The Washington Independent ,February 07, 2009 Attorney General Holder promised during his confirmation hearing to reexamine all cases where the Justice Department asserted the state secrets privilege. … [...]

By: Ted

Ted — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:09:13 +0000

Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, has confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The questions of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited “after-the-fact” short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addessed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment “citizen” is not sufficient. A “President” MUST BE an Article 2 “natural born citizen” AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.

By: lesser ajax

lesser ajax — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:05:55 +0000

Is this state secrets or the Totten justiciability doctrine?