The Coming Military-Civilian Resource Shift, Cont’d (II)

By
Monday, February 02, 2009 at 9:56 am

The Pentagon under Defense Secretary Robert Gates is like a Crazy Eddie’s store: move this merchandise out of here at all costs. Well, not really, but it’s still striking that Gates and the counterinsurgency advocates around him are pressing the point that the Defense Department needs to do less in the national-security realm and the civilian agencies of government need to do more. Walter Pincus reports the latest development in this trend:

[Gates] has formally adopted the concept that national security planning and budgeting cannot be done by the Pentagon alone, according to the Defense Department’s newly released Quadrennial Roles and Missions Review Report.

“The Department supports institutionalizing whole-of-government approaches to addressing national security challenges,” the document says, adding, “The desired end state is for U.S. Government national security partners to develop plans and conduct operations from a shared perspective.”

“Whole of government” was a phrase that Michele Flournoy, the incoming undersecretary of defense for policy, used at several points during her confirmation hearing two weeks ago. It’ll be interesting to see, despite the delay in presenting the Pentagon budget this year, how this all actually shakes out into budgetary decisions. Late last week, the White House Office of Management and Budget told the Pentagon to “substantial[ly]” restrain its planned fiscal 2010 budget, which the Bush administration beefed up by $60 billion over the 2009 budget before leaving office.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

2 Comments

dc Owl
Comment posted February 2, 2009 @ 9:54 am

This would be an important development, but we'll see if the State Department accepts an interagency planning responsibility. Its culture does not reward nor promote planning.


dc Owl
Comment posted February 2, 2009 @ 5:54 pm

This would be an important development, but we'll see if the State Department accepts an interagency planning responsibility. Its culture does not reward nor promote planning.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.