Comments on: In Defense of Michael Barone http://washingtonindependent.com/28467/in-defense-of-michael-barone National News in Context Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Porkchopicus_of_Borg http://washingtonindependent.com/28467/in-defense-of-michael-barone/comment-page-1#comment-36820 Porkchopicus_of_Borg Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:02:33 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=28467#comment-36820 So let me get this straight, Mr. Weigel. We shouldn't pile on Barone for something he wrote a while back that was totally wrong, because something he's recently written might eventually turn out to be, oh, maybe not *quite* as wrong?<br><br>Is that what you're saying? So let me get this straight, Mr. Weigel. We shouldn't pile on Barone for something he wrote a while back that was totally wrong, because something he's recently written might eventually turn out to be, oh, maybe not *quite* as wrong?

Is that what you're saying?

]]> By: Porkchopicus_of_Borg http://washingtonindependent.com/28467/in-defense-of-michael-barone/comment-page-1#comment-17218 Porkchopicus_of_Borg Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:02:33 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=28467#comment-17218 So let me get this straight, Mr. Weigel. We shouldn't pile on Barone for something he wrote a while back that was totally wrong, because something he's recently written might eventually turn out to be, oh, maybe not *quite* as wrong?<br><br>Is that what you're saying? So let me get this straight, Mr. Weigel. We shouldn't pile on Barone for something he wrote a while back that was totally wrong, because something he's recently written might eventually turn out to be, oh, maybe not *quite* as wrong?

Is that what you're saying?

]]>