Bankruptcy Reform Meets Unlikely Foe
Monday, January 26, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Congressional Democrats hoping to use the economic stimulus package to force lenders to refinance troubled mortgages have met an unlikely opponent: President Barack Obama.
Many Democrats, including Obama, have long-supported the strategy of empowering bankruptcy judges to alter the terms of primary mortgages to prevent foreclosures. But White House officials have said they don’t want the bankruptcy provision in the stimulus bill for fear of alienating Republicans, most of whom oppose the change.
Bipartisan cooperation was a central theme of Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, and he wants his first legislative victory to hinge on something other than a party-line vote. Last week, Obama and Democratic leaders agreed instead to attach the bankruptcy provision to a large spending bill that Congress is expected to consider later this year, according to reports.
That stance has piqued some Democrats, who are beginning to wonder if the push for bipartisan agreement is worth the cost of waiting. For each day that Congress dallies, these lawmakers say, thousands of Americans lose their homes to foreclosure.
“I believe the ‘fierce urgency of now,’ requires us not only to pass this out of committee, but to pass it in the stimulus,” Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) said last week, according to The Hill. “Because we know the stimulus is going to pass.”
The debate arrives as the nation’s economy continues to sink and Washington lawmakers are growing bolder in their efforts to intervene. Yet, while lawmakers have stepped in to provide enormous bailouts to the finance and auto industries, they’ve done almost nothing to tackle the foreclosure crisis that was the root of the turmoil. A $300 billion program enacted in July offered lenders government guarantees on troubled mortgages if the lenders agreed to absorb a 10 percent loss. Only a few hundred homeowners have benefited.
House Democrats, with much input from the Obama administration, introduced legislation this month to spend roughly $550 billion on infrastructure projects and aid to states over the next two years, while providing another $275 billion in tax credits to individuals and businesses.
The proposal also contains provisions addressing the housing crisis, including $4.2 billion to help hard-hit communities buy up foreclosed homes “and reduce neighborhood blight.” But the proposal leaves out the changes in bankruptcy law.
The House is expected to vote on the stimulus bill Wednesday. The measure is likely to pass easily, though Republicans continue to criticize the plan for what they consider to be a dearth of tax cuts.
Housing advocates have long-pushed to empower bankruptcy judges to reduce, or “cram down,” the balance of primary mortgages, as well as other terms of the loans, to keep homeowners from suffering foreclosure. That legal avenue is currently available for loans on commercial property, yachts, vacation homes — almost anything but primary mortgages, which were singled out for exception under bankruptcy law.
The Center for Responsible Lending, a consumer advocacy group, estimates that 2 million homes have been foreclosed on since 2007, with 2.2 million more sub-prime mortgages projected to fail this year. The latter figure represents 6,000 foreclosures every day of the week.
A report released by Credit Suisse on Monday estimates that the change in bankruptcy law would reduce foreclosures by 20 percent.
“Everyday that goes by, thousands of people are losing their homes,” said Kathleen Day, a spokeswoman for the Center for Responsible Lending. “We’ve waited long enough.”
Last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the bankruptcy change falls “very high” on her to-do list this year.
“Enacting bankruptcy legislation is a very high priority, and we will have it either free standing or in some piece of legislation that will become law soon,” Pelosi told reporters at the Capitol Thursday. “The more time that goes by, more people lose the opportunity to stay in their homes. It is urgent.”
House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.), who held a hearing on cramdown legislation last week, has scheduled another meeting Tuesday to move the bill through the committee.
Democrats found some unexpected support earlier this month when Citigroup, which has accepted billions in bailout funding from Washington in recent months, bucked most others in the industry and endorsed the cramdown proposal.
Still, the larger finance industry has been a fierce opponent of the bankruptcy change, arguing that forced mortgage renegotiations for troubled loans would lead to interest rate hikes for everyone.
John Jackson, president and CEO of Lending Cycle, a Kentucky-based lending software company, said the change would “put the banking system in a situation that’s not viable.”
“This creates a whole new burden which just exacerbates the problem,” said Jackson, the former executive vice president at First Bank in Louisville. “It removes the profitability of that loan for banks.”
But housing advocates and many Democrats dispute that claim. David Berenbaum, executive vice president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, called the industry argument “a smokescreen,” pointing out that, for the past eight years, bankruptcy judges have been appointed by the industry-friendly Bush administration.
“There is actually no reason to believe that that a judge will just blindly side with a homeowner,” Berenbaum said.
Berenbaum also warned that bankruptcy reforms alone would not solve the problem. Without additional changes prohibiting the predatory lending practices that contributed to the crisis, he said, there’s nothing preventing it from recurring.
“Unless we address the underlying issue that got us into this economy,” Berenbaum said, “this could all happen once again.”
It’s not the first time the debate has surfaced. The House passed anti-predatory lending legislation in November 2007, but it was never taken up in the Senate. That bill takes steps to ensure that borrowers can afford loans before they take them out. It also bans the financial incentives that led many lenders to steer consumers to sub-prime and other more costly loans.
Heather Wong, spokeswoman for House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), said the House intends to consider similar anti-predatory lending legislation again this year.
18 Comments
Pingback posted January 27, 2009 @ 4:22 am
[...] Read the rest here: The Washington Independent
Pingback posted January 27, 2009 @ 6:23 am
[...] long will Congress wait before voting on Chapter 13 bankruptcy reform? The article linked to above says many in Congress are eager, but the administration, though [...]
Comment posted January 27, 2009 @ 11:25 am
Its time for obama to say, “I tried to be inclusive. I tried to work with the Congressional Republicans. Now the economy and the suffering American Public can wait no longer. The big picture must be addressed NOW. I am asking Congress to pass my stimulus package as soon as possible. I am asking Congress to put aside their personal objections. After all Congress has not lost its job. It has not lost its savings, or house or college fund. Congress has not lost its pension. Millions of Americans HAVE, and CONTINUE TO LOSE THESE THINGS WHILE CONGRESS DELAYS.
CONGRESS YOU MUST HELP YOUR CONSTITUENTS NOW.”
Pingback posted January 27, 2009 @ 11:45 am
[...] the country is in a crisis, and he (and we) can ill afford to try to placate the GOP Right. Mike Lillis reports in the Washington Independent: Congressional Democrats hoping to use the economic stimulus package [...]
Comment posted January 27, 2009 @ 11:51 pm
I'm a fiscally conservative republican, an economist, and a banker. AND… I'm tired of my party failing to live up to its original intentions and basic sound business practices. There is no fundamental basis for prohibiting realignment and adjustment of individual mortgage debt beyond the lobbying efforts of my industry. The argument that rates will rise across the board is unfounded. I'm loaning money for $100M projects at sub 6% today, and they certainly can be crammed down. Mr. Obama, your sweeping victory, and the subsequent loss of (R) seats in Congress should embolden you to act more aggressively. I can assure you that, without changes to judicial powers, the long slow homeowner death-march will continue unabated well into 2010. Our industry knows all too well that we have unstoppable power of foreclosure and little financial incentive for work-outs. It is time to change the law, and bring some balance of power to the equation.
Pingback posted January 28, 2009 @ 2:02 am
[...] The Washington Independent » Bankruptcy Reform Meets Unlikely Foe [...]
Pingback posted January 28, 2009 @ 10:03 am
[...] Obama has tried to placate such GOPers by stripping provisions he would otherwise support — like bankruptcy reform, or in this case expanded health care coverage — to produce a bill Republicans will vote for [...]
Comment posted January 28, 2009 @ 11:25 am
I have personally witnessed many of my acquaintences in the OC who had been employed in the sub-prime mortgage field, now switch to staffing the weekend auctions of foreclosed properties.. I wonder if they see anyone that recognises them as double bottom feeders. Good riddance to Ameriquest and all their ilk.
Comment posted January 30, 2009 @ 2:06 pm
This is an unfortunate issue to cave on in the name of bipartisan unity. Mortgages need to be fixed if homes are to be saved and the economy is to recover.
Comment posted January 31, 2009 @ 6:42 pm
The Democrats do not have enough seats in the Senate to block a filibuster. Also, according to the AP “Fight building over judges redoing mortgages” Jan. 25, 2009, 10 democrats still in the Senate voted against a similar measure last year. I am all in favor of keeping political pressure on President Obama to do the right thing. But in this instance, we can pin this latest travesty on Republicans in the Senate and the 10 conservative Democrats who act in the interests of banks and not people.
Comment posted April 29, 2009 @ 6:05 am
The debate arrives as the nation’s economy continues to sink and Washington lawmakers are growing bolder in their efforts to intervene. Yet, while lawmakers have stepped in to provide enormous bailouts to the finance and auto industries, they’ve done almost nothing to tackle the foreclosure crisis that was the root of the turmoil.
Comment posted November 20, 2009 @ 5:28 am
I have not much time, but I've got many useful things here, love it!
Comment posted February 3, 2010 @ 6:15 pm
Your government has been hijacked by Multi-National Corporations who don't give a fuck about Democracy, Justice, Fairness, America, Humanity, Children, Education, they are a “Greed is Good Capitalist-Death-Cult” bunch of preditory vultures & vampires eager to pick the meat off your bones after they've starved your famly to DEATH!
Comment posted February 3, 2010 @ 11:15 pm
Your government has been hijacked by Multi-National Corporations who don't give a fuck about Democracy, Justice, Fairness, America, Humanity, Children, Education, they are a “Greed is Good Capitalist-Death-Cult” bunch of preditory vultures & vampires eager to pick the meat off your bones after they've starved your famly to DEATH!
Comment posted August 5, 2010 @ 3:18 pm
Thanks for this interesting post,i like it.
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 12:14 pm
This is the right blog for anyone who wants to find out about this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually would wantÂ…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss
