Conyers Subpoenas Rove: ‘It’s Time to Talk’
Monday, January 26, 2009 at 6:28 pm
Karl Rove, who previously refused to testify to his involvement in the politicization of the Justice Department and the U.S. attorney firing scandal as former President George W. Bush’s deputy chief of staff, was subpoenaed today by House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.).
From the Committee’s press release, which is posted on The Huffington Post:
“I have said many times that I will carry this investigation forward to its conclusion, whether in Congress or in court, and today’s action is an important step along the way,” said Mr. Conyers. Noting that the change in administration may impact the legal arguments available to Mr. Rove in this long-running dispute, Mr. Conyers added “Change has come to Washington, and I hope Karl Rove is ready for it. After two years of stonewalling, it’s time for him to talk.”
Rove’s prior refusals to testify were based on claims of “absolute immunity” through executive privilege — the idea that even former presidential advisers cannot be compelled to testify before Congress. But the legality of that claim was rejected by U.S. District Judge John Bates as part of the ongoing suit over executive privilege, House Judiciary Committee v. Harriet Miers.
The onset of the new administration creates a lot of new questions as to how Rove will answer this subpoena. Rove is relying on an interpretation of executive privilege that is no longer backed by the administration, so it’s unclear how, or if, he will still be protected. While it looks likely that this new Congress’ subpoena will finally wrest “privileged” documents from the White House, its still unclear as to whether Rove will testify before the committee.
Some of these questions are still tied up in HJC v. Miers, but some will have to be answered as events play out. This is an entirely unprecedented area of the law, so we’ll just have to wait and see.
7 Comments
Comment posted January 26, 2009 @ 4:34 pm
While I see this as good news, I also expect an interminable series of delaying tactics on the part of Mr. Rove's defense attorney. IMO, it will be a long time before the prosecution manages to squeeze the least bit of information from Mr. Rove.
Comment posted January 26, 2009 @ 5:24 pm
I think of Rove wasn't pretty doggone sure he'd come out on top that he would have gotton a pardon from W. I think Rove secretly wants this fight in order to give the Obama administration and the Democratic congress a black eye.
Comment posted January 26, 2009 @ 7:22 pm
somebody needs to explain why previous Presidents have fired US attorneys without repercussions.
Pingback posted January 26, 2009 @ 8:21 pm
[...] times have changed. A lot. Old Karl may have to pull what he pulled last time and flee the country for awhile. This [...]
Comment posted January 27, 2009 @ 12:34 am
While I see this as good news, I also expect an interminable series of delaying tactics on the part of Mr. Rove's defense attorney. IMO, it will be a long time before the prosecution manages to squeeze the least bit of information from Mr. Rove.
Comment posted January 27, 2009 @ 1:24 am
I think of Rove wasn't pretty doggone sure he'd come out on top that he would have gotton a pardon from W. I think Rove secretly wants this fight in order to give the Obama administration and the Democratic congress a black eye.
Comment posted January 27, 2009 @ 3:22 am
somebody needs to explain why previous Presidents have fired US attorneys without repercussions.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss