<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Former Lobbyist Could Still Do Business with Raytheon from Pentagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/27165/lynn-could-still-do-business-with-raytheon-from-pentagon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27165/lynn-could-still-do-business-with-raytheon-from-pentagon</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn and Zinni: Two Sides of a Coin &#171; The Stupidest Man on Earth</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27165/lynn-could-still-do-business-with-raytheon-from-pentagon/comment-page-1#comment-17753</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn and Zinni: Two Sides of a Coin &#171; The Stupidest Man on Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=27165#comment-17753</guid>
		<description>[...] 6, 2009 by Jari    First, there was the ruckus about a former Raytheon lobbyist being tapped for the number 2 post at the Pentagon. Now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6, 2009 by Jari    First, there was the ruckus about a former Raytheon lobbyist being tapped for the number 2 post at the Pentagon. Now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O.</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27165/lynn-could-still-do-business-with-raytheon-from-pentagon/comment-page-1#comment-34344</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=27165#comment-34344</guid>
		<description>So it looks like Gates wanted this guy and Obama wants to give Gates his preferred guy. So why did Gates want him? And what makes him so much better that he could get a waiver?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it looks like Gates wanted this guy and Obama wants to give Gates his preferred guy. So why did Gates want him? And what makes him so much better that he could get a waiver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O.</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27165/lynn-could-still-do-business-with-raytheon-from-pentagon/comment-page-1#comment-16229</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=27165#comment-16229</guid>
		<description>So it looks like Gates wanted this guy and Obama wants to give Gates his preferred guy. So why did Gates want him? And what makes him so much better that he could get a waiver?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it looks like Gates wanted this guy and Obama wants to give Gates his preferred guy. So why did Gates want him? And what makes him so much better that he could get a waiver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric_Jaffa</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27165/lynn-could-still-do-business-with-raytheon-from-pentagon/comment-page-1#comment-16214</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric_Jaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=27165#comment-16214</guid>
		<description>Since the only check seems to be &quot;ethics reviews,&quot; those should not only be for one year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They should be for his entire time in the Defense Department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the only check seems to be &#8220;ethics reviews,&#8221; those should not only be for one year.</p>
<p>They should be for his entire time in the Defense Department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Antinucci</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27165/lynn-could-still-do-business-with-raytheon-from-pentagon/comment-page-1#comment-16212</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Antinucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=27165#comment-16212</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure Lynn&#039;s record is so squeaky clean. Read this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003017029&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=new...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not so sure Lynn&#39;s record is so squeaky clean. Read this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003017029" rel="nofollow">http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=new&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

