Comments on: The Truth About Martin Luther King Jr.

By: gurl_bye

gurl_bye — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 06:58:35 +0000

alot of ppl wtf duh

By: gurl_bye

gurl_bye — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 06:57:45 +0000

thank you finnally someone who knows the facts

By: mikailahpayne

mikailahpayne — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:21:27 +0000

- heyyy,

By: ReginaTheGreat

ReginaTheGreat — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:40:28 +0000

You're an idiot.

By: ReginaTheGreat

ReginaTheGreat — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:40:28 +0000

You're an idiot.

By: Marisela

Marisela — Mon, 18 May 2009 20:58:06 +0000

WTF!!!!

By: Marisela

Marisela — Mon, 18 May 2009 13:58:06 +0000

WTF!!!!

By: sickofit

sickofit — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:07:21 +0000

two steps forward one step BLACK !!!! the Citizens of the USA seem to be on crack when it comes to politicians all together..its sad to see such a great country go down in flames due to bad voting and being blinded by a word “change” well in the end the only change they will have is what is left in there pockets in the end.. What really upsets me is the fact that the american people had the power to vote out all the senators and congressmen who voted in the first bailout and started the chain of effects of more and more government bailouts and ownership of banks and business. We are far from falling all the way down the hill..

By: dee303

dee303 — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:15:48 +0000

1. King was not seeking to have the ruling power that comes with the Presidency of the United States.
2. King was a registered Republican. The Democrats at that time were seeking to keep the “Negro” separated.
3. If proven to not be a “natural born citizen”, the president would be a “usurper” and not legally President of the U.S., subsequently he would not be subject to impeachment , as that only pertains to legal presidents. He would have to be arrested and physically removed from the White House.

By: irrelevant

irrelevant — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:40:35 +0000

King wasn't running for president so who cares when or where he was born