rssThe Truth About Martin Luther King Jr.
Friday, January 16, 2009 at 9:13 am
- 19 Comments
Apropos of yesterday’s post about the derangement of Alan Keyes, I’ve been reading Taylor Branch’s majestic civil rights history, “Parting the Waters,” and noticed this passage about the naming of Martin Luther King Jr., whose father had been born “Mike” but changed his and his son’s name to “Martin” after a trip to the Holy Land.
King Jr.’s birth certificate remains a family secret, but State Department records indicate that it was filed on April 12, 1934, in the name “Martin Luther King, Jr.” This indicates that King Jr.’s name was recorded officially when he was five years and three months old.
O. M. G. The implications are staggering. Not only can we not prove that King was born in 1929, we cannot prove that King was ever born at all. If only the brave Warriors of the Birth Certificate were around to hound King in the 1950s and 1960s, instead of the sad sacks at the FBI.
Follow David Weigel on Twitter
19 Comments
Comment posted January 16, 2009 @ 7:45 am
I demand that the King family release the vaulted copy of the birth cerificate to the media!!!!
What are they afraid of????
Did you know that Martin Luther King, Jr. day is unconstitutional if he wasn't an natural-born-american-native-born-citizen????
Comment posted January 16, 2009 @ 3:56 pm
surely you jest. But begs the question. If Obama was not a natural born citizen, would you demand he leave office?
Comment posted January 17, 2009 @ 10:52 am
No, I'd demand that he be impeached and then tried and convicted for fraud and treason.
Comment posted January 17, 2009 @ 1:23 pm
MLK was assassinated while whore-mongering with white prostitutes, one of whom he had taken to beating on. That's a fact, and your FBI “sad sacks” got it on tape. He was a liar and a fraud and a black racist, just like Malcom X, Jesse Jackson, Rev. Wright and all the rest of the Negro racists that were Obama's heroes all his life.
And what is it about these guys, that they can't talk about their origins openly. Don' t they know who their fathers are?
Comment posted January 17, 2009 @ 1:26 pm
Sounds great but try to find a congressman or judge who would have the gonads or the honesty or integrity to do it. We citizens have no power other than what we derive from our pitiful “clinging to guns and religion”. Speaking of guns…………
Comment posted January 17, 2009 @ 5:30 pm
If Obama is not a natural born citizen it does not matter what you or I think, it is what the Constitution says. You know the document created to protect the rights of the People. If whatever Barry/Obama or whatever his name is has been hiding shows he is not eligible to hold the office as a natural born citizen then he needs to either step down or be physically escorted from the White House. This issue is not over.
Comment posted January 17, 2009 @ 9:29 pm
It's obvious that The New World Order really wants Obama. This isn't just a Democrat/Republican controversey. The Powers-That-Be want HIM and him alone. I do believe no matter what turns up, he will be shielded from any actions taken against him – he is protected. His presidency represents the quantum leap the Conspiracy has waited so long to make.He is just another useful idiot.
Two steps forward, one step back.
Comment posted January 17, 2009 @ 9:58 pm
That's not true. “The only thing necessary for evil to win is for good men to do nothing.” Check out http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org and http://www.campaignforliberty.com and get involved!
Comment posted January 18, 2009 @ 9:40 pm
King wasn't running for president so who cares when or where he was born
Comment posted January 23, 2009 @ 10:15 am
1. King was not seeking to have the ruling power that comes with the Presidency of the United States.
2. King was a registered Republican. The Democrats at that time were seeking to keep the “Negro” separated.
3. If proven to not be a “natural born citizen”, the president would be a “usurper” and not legally President of the U.S., subsequently he would not be subject to impeachment , as that only pertains to legal presidents. He would have to be arrested and physically removed from the White House.
Comment posted March 16, 2009 @ 8:07 am
two steps forward one step BLACK !!!! the Citizens of the USA seem to be on crack when it comes to politicians all together..its sad to see such a great country go down in flames due to bad voting and being blinded by a word “change” well in the end the only change they will have is what is left in there pockets in the end.. What really upsets me is the fact that the american people had the power to vote out all the senators and congressmen who voted in the first bailout and started the chain of effects of more and more government bailouts and ownership of banks and business. We are far from falling all the way down the hill..
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
