CLINTON CONFIRMATION: Darfur

By
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 11:18 am

“A terrible humanitarian crises compounded by a cruel and corrupt regime in Khartoum.” There’s another strategy review on Darfur. “We intend to bring as many people along as we can to fulfill the [African Union] mandate.” The top officials “have spoken of other options: no fly zones, other sanctions and sanctuaries … there is a lot under consideration.”

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

4 Comments

mohammed
Comment posted January 15, 2009 @ 12:18 pm

“A terrible humanitarian crises compounded by a cruel and corrupt regime in” Tel Aviv. ” There's another strategy review on” Gaza. “We intend to bring as many people along as we can to fulfill the ” [United Nations] 30+ resolutions. ” The top officials” should speak “of other options: no fly zones, other sanctions and sanctuaries”…. “there” should be “a lot under consideration.”


mohammed
Comment posted January 15, 2009 @ 8:18 pm

“A terrible humanitarian crises compounded by a cruel and corrupt regime in” Tel Aviv. ” There's another strategy review on” Gaza. “We intend to bring as many people along as we can to fulfill the ” [United Nations] 30+ resolutions. ” The top officials” should speak “of other options: no fly zones, other sanctions and sanctuaries”…. “there” should be “a lot under consideration.”


Adam
Comment posted September 3, 2009 @ 5:45 pm

Along with inter-Muslim slaughter in Sudan, Muslims also like to ignore the fact that Baha'is and other religious minorities are viciously persecuted in Muslim countries. Why don't you ask your co-religionists to stop killing Baha'is in Iran, Mohammed? Also, even the Ulster Unionists and IRA, at their worst, never lobbed Molotovs or sent suicide bombers into each others' churches (Sunnis and Shias blow up each others' mosques, with people inside). Maybe it's because Christians and Jews aren't promised a 72 ho gangbang in the afterlife.


Adam
Comment posted September 3, 2009 @ 5:54 pm

The problem of Darfur boils down to the un-PC fact that people in developing countries, like Sudan, have too many babies. Thanks to immunization and better sanitation, they're not dropping like flies…but still breeding like rabbits. The population grows, but arable land and freshwater supplies don't. 'Quorum genes' make organisms fight for scarce resources: food, water, grazing land and 'Lebensraum'.

The long-term solution is to reintroduce aggressive family planning to the Third World. The conservatives cling to the 'be fruitfull and multiply' nonsense and liberals don't like telling third-worlders what to do. The result has been an unsustainable level of population growth. Bulk exports of third-worlders to developed countries isn't doing anything positive, other than keeping our real estate bubble inflated. These people are authors of their own misfortune, by their incontinence and fecundity.

Only if the population of Sudan drops and holds to a sustainable level is peace possible.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.