Comments on: Without Objection

By: moncler jackets

moncler jackets — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:00:00 +0000

I actually heard it on the local talk radio station… from the host, not some nutjob caller.

By: moncler jackets

moncler jackets — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:56:00 +0000

I actually heard it on the local talk radio station… from the host, not some nutjob caller.

By: passport case

passport case — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:13:38 +0000

WorldNetDaily has the exclusive: Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) has joined five Republican members of Congress in demanding an investigation of the Council on American-Islamic Relation’s lobbying activities, to determine whether it should lose its non-profit status. Read Coburn’s letter after the jump.WorldNetDaily has the exclusive: Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) has joined five Republican members of Congress in demanding an investigation of the Council on American-Islamic Relation’s lobbying activities, to determine whether it should lose its non-profit status. Read Coburn’s letter after the jump.

By: louis vuitton speedy

louis vuitton speedy — Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:01:44 +0000

I actually heard it on the local talk radio station… from the host, not some nutjob caller.

By: Ted

Ted — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:57:32 +0000

Obama can't be POTUS.

Since no congressman and senator objected on 1/8/09 to Congress' count and certification of the electoral vote which would have turned resolution of Obama's eligibility issue over to Congress, rendering moot both the Berg and Lightfoot cases, Berg finally does achieve standing on the issue of actual harm, to be addressed at the 1/9/09 SCOTUS Conference on Writ of Certiorari. Obama's failure to submit evidence of his constitutional qualification for the 1/9/09 conference will mean he cannot thereafter challenge Berg's request to enjoin the 1/8/09 Congressional electoral count and certification, albeit retroactive, scheduled for SCOTUS conference 1/16/09. Moreover, Chief Justice Roberts has scheduled a full Court conference on the Lightfoot case 1/23/09 in the event there needs to be a Constitutionally mandated action, the Inauguration itself, to enjoin retroactively.

Checkmate! (WHERE IS THE NEWS MEDIA?)

By: subscribetorss

subscribetorss — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:52:47 +0000

The next great conspiracy theory:
The Obama administration is planning on removing one of the faces on Mt. Rushmore and replacing it with President Obama's face.
It's not like I made that up. I actually heard it on the local talk radio station… from the host, not some nutjob caller.

By: Ted

Ted — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:57:32 +0000

By: subscribetorss

subscribetorss — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:52:47 +0000

By: Joe Six-Pack

Joe Six-Pack — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:36:22 +0000

So much for the constitution. Maybe, the Supreme Court will finally step up (they are reviewing cases Jan 9th, 16th, and 23rd). Don't hold your breath.

By: dsgawrsh

dsgawrsh — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:05:19 +0000

I'm not squealing in pain, the Constitution is. This is the first time that a Presidential wanna be never bothered to show a vault birth certificate to prove his natural born status. It's not just conspiracy, it's truth.