Comments on: D.C. Federal Judge Orders Bush Administration to Produce Evidence About Bagram Prisoners http://washingtonindependent.com/24470/dc-federal-judge-orders-bush-administration-to-produce-evidence-about-bagram-prisoners National News in Context Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: rufus http://washingtonindependent.com/24470/dc-federal-judge-orders-bush-administration-to-produce-evidence-about-bagram-prisoners/comment-page-1#comment-37214 rufus Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:14:08 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=24470#comment-37214 JUDGE BATES IS MERELY WRONG. JUDGE BATES IS MERELY WRONG.

]]> By: rufus http://washingtonindependent.com/24470/dc-federal-judge-orders-bush-administration-to-produce-evidence-about-bagram-prisoners/comment-page-1#comment-16908 rufus Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:14:08 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=24470#comment-16908 JUDGE BATES IS MERELY WRONG. JUDGE BATES IS MERELY WRONG.

]]> By: Good news: courts showing interest in “evidence” « Later On http://washingtonindependent.com/24470/dc-federal-judge-orders-bush-administration-to-produce-evidence-about-bagram-prisoners/comment-page-1#comment-15266 Good news: courts showing interest in “evidence” « Later On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:10:45 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=24470#comment-15266 [...] in Bush Administration, GOP, Government tagged human rights at 11:10 am by LeisureGuy Daphne Eviatar for the Washington Independent: After hearing arguments on whether prisoners held indefinitely without charge at the [...] [...] in Bush Administration, GOP, Government tagged human rights at 11:10 am by LeisureGuy Daphne Eviatar for the Washington Independent: After hearing arguments on whether prisoners held indefinitely without charge at the [...]

]]> By: Chris http://washingtonindependent.com/24470/dc-federal-judge-orders-bush-administration-to-produce-evidence-about-bagram-prisoners/comment-page-1#comment-15268 Chris Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:38:14 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=24470#comment-15268 My guess is that this will end up revolving around the definition of a "battlefield". Historically there were well-delineated areas where armies faced off, but with the "War on Terror" I can see the Bush administration claiming that even my living room could be deemed a battle field if I happen to be collaborating with terrorists there over the Internet.<br><br>Not that I am... Big Brother can stop getting nervous about me now. My guess is that this will end up revolving around the definition of a “battlefield”. Historically there were well-delineated areas where armies faced off, but with the “War on Terror” I can see the Bush administration claiming that even my living room could be deemed a battle field if I happen to be collaborating with terrorists there over the Internet.

Not that I am… Big Brother can stop getting nervous about me now.

]]>