<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems Diffuse a Controversy, Won&#8217;t Seat Franken Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/23907/dems-diffuse-a-controversy-wont-seat-franken-today/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/23907/dems-diffuse-a-controversy-wont-seat-franken-today</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:50:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul greenfield</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/23907/dems-diffuse-a-controversy-wont-seat-franken-today/comment-page-1#comment-37753</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=23907#comment-37753</guid>
		<description>Absent evidence that Mr. Burris obtained his appointment dishonestly, and I believe there is none, the refusal of the Senate to seat him, because he was appointed by an indicted, but not convicted governor, has no legal footing, and will surely be overturned. In the meantime, the sanctimony of the senators who insist on this charade is both laughable and outrageous. If purity in obtaining a senate seat were a requirement of office, we would have about five senators, if that many.&lt;br&gt;Cut the baloney and get to work on the real problems facing this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absent evidence that Mr. Burris obtained his appointment dishonestly, and I believe there is none, the refusal of the Senate to seat him, because he was appointed by an indicted, but not convicted governor, has no legal footing, and will surely be overturned. In the meantime, the sanctimony of the senators who insist on this charade is both laughable and outrageous. If purity in obtaining a senate seat were a requirement of office, we would have about five senators, if that many.<br />Cut the baloney and get to work on the real problems facing this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HV</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/23907/dems-diffuse-a-controversy-wont-seat-franken-today/comment-page-1#comment-37754</link>
		<dc:creator>HV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=23907#comment-37754</guid>
		<description>Under the Constitution of the United States, Buurris is the new Illinois Senator.  I would have preferred Jackson or Davis.  Stopping Burris is not worth throwing the Constitution in the toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the Constitution of the United States, Buurris is the new Illinois Senator.  I would have preferred Jackson or Davis.  Stopping Burris is not worth throwing the Constitution in the toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul greenfield</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/23907/dems-diffuse-a-controversy-wont-seat-franken-today/comment-page-1#comment-15098</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=23907#comment-15098</guid>
		<description>Absent evidence that Mr. Burris obtained his appointment dishonestly, and I believe there is none, the refusal of the Senate to seat him, because he was appointed by an indicted, but not convicted governor, has no legal footing, and will surely be overturned. In the meantime, the sanctimony of the senators who insist on this charade is both laughable and outrageous. If purity in obtaining a senate seat were a requirement of office, we would have about five senators, if that many.&lt;br&gt;Cut the baloney and get to work on the real problems facing this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absent evidence that Mr. Burris obtained his appointment dishonestly, and I believe there is none, the refusal of the Senate to seat him, because he was appointed by an indicted, but not convicted governor, has no legal footing, and will surely be overturned. In the meantime, the sanctimony of the senators who insist on this charade is both laughable and outrageous. If purity in obtaining a senate seat were a requirement of office, we would have about five senators, if that many.<br />Cut the baloney and get to work on the real problems facing this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HV</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/23907/dems-diffuse-a-controversy-wont-seat-franken-today/comment-page-1#comment-15091</link>
		<dc:creator>HV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=23907#comment-15091</guid>
		<description>Under the Constitution of the United States, Buurris is the new Illinois Senator.  I would have preferred Jackson or Davis.  Stopping Burris is not worth throwing the Constitution in the toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the Constitution of the United States, Buurris is the new Illinois Senator.  I would have preferred Jackson or Davis.  Stopping Burris is not worth throwing the Constitution in the toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
