Intel Community Sees Potential in Panetta

Monday, January 05, 2009 at 7:47 pm
Leon Panetta (National Marine Sanctuary Foundation)

Leon Panetta (National Marine Sanctuary Foundation)

The surprising news that former congressman and White House chief of staff Leon Panetta will be tapped to head the CIA represented an about face for President-elect Barack Obama’s early effort at putting an intelligence veteran at the top of the nation’s chief spy agency. But initially at least, the Panetta pick has not generated consternation from intelligence veterans, despite his lack of experience with intelligence.

Illustration by: Matt Mahurin

Illustration by: Matt Mahurin

Although there is concern about putting an inexperienced director in place during wartime, some longtime intelligence officials see Panetta’s proximity to Obama as a silver lining, as having a director with Panetta’s close ties to Obama may ensure the agency’s continued relevance.

“He has no intel background as far as I know,” said one recently retired intelligence official who requested anonymity, “and it’ll be a steep learning curve.” Within an hour, a retired senior official who also requested anonymity repeated the “steep learning curve” line unprompted. Yet both agreed that intelligence experience isn’t the only criterion for chairing the agency.

That looks to be the instant conventional wisdom. Outside of some intelligence planning work he did while in the Army in the 1960s, Panetta’s experience in the intelligence world is minimal. Obaman’s plans to appoint him are a throwback to an earlier era of CIA chiefs who earned their jobs thanks to political fealty to the president. Panetta, a longtime member of the Washington establishment, publicly criticized Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign during the hard-fought primaries in early 2008 — something that was particularly valuable to Obama at the time, given Panetta’s service as President Bill Clinton’s chief of staff. In that respect, Panetta resembles directors like William Casey, who ascended to the head of Langley in 1981 after chairing Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign. But even Casey, one of the most political CIA directors in history, served in the Office of Strategic Services, the World War II-era forerunner of the CIA.

“Totally political types as head of CIA tend to ruffle feathers, since the [intelligence community] is a complicated, tribal place,” said the recently retired intelligence official.

Still, intelligence veterans interviewed by The Washington Independent were noticeably sanguine about the appointment. Some said that Panetta’s closeness with Obama would give the CIA a relevance with the White House that it chronically worries it will lose. When a small Cessna airplane crashed on the lawn of the Clinton White House in the 1990s, the joke around Langley was that the pilot was then-director Jim Woolsey trying to get an appointment with the president. This fear has been magnified in recent years, after Congress in 2004 stripped the CIA of its premier position within the community by creating an independent intelligence czar known as the director of national intelligence.

“There are probably many, like myself, who would rather see [a CIA veteran] in the job,” said the retired senior official. “But then you say, ‘If not, where do you turn?’ And here’s a guy who was White House chief of staff and obviously has a lot of political juice. Those who’d worry that the CIA will be relegated to a backseat position vis-a-vis the [Director of National Intelligence] can take heart.”

A Democratic official confirmed that Panetta will be the pick — a development first reported by The New York Times on Monday afternoon — and that ret. Adm. Dennis Blair will be the director of national intelligence, the overall head of the intelligence community. Transition officials would not discuss the process that led to the selection of Panetta and Blair.

As a result, the leadership of the intelligence community at a time of war will be a relatively inexperienced one. While Blair served as the CIA’s first-ever liaison to the military before retiring from the Navy in 2002, “Denny’s experience is not that deep,” said the retired senior official — something that might indicate that Panetta will be at least as influential to Obama as Blair. “He had a stint out at Langley ten years ago, he’s not an intel expert,” the retired official continued. “Matching Denny’s political clout against Panetta, I’d be more inclined to pick Panetta, not vice versa.”

Earlier in the transition, Obama signaled that he was looking within CIA circles for the agency’s new leadership. But in late November, the leading candidate for the job, John Brennan, a former senior intelligence official under director George Tenet, withdrew from consideration to be CIA director after Salon’s Glenn Greenwald criticized statements Brennan made for reflecting a cavalier disposition to the torture of detainees in CIA custody and the so-called “rendition” of detainees to countries that commit torture. The selection process — which Brennan still chaired — was believed to focus on longtime intelligence hands who were uncorrupted by the Bush years, when abusive interrogations received official sanction. Panetta’s appointment indicated to several intelligence veterans that too many of their colleagues could either not withstand scrutiny or would generate too much controversy. “People were done in by the past,” said Tyler Drumheller, former chief of CIA operations in Europe during the Bush administration.

Panetta, by contrast, has written forcefully against the use of torture in interrogations. “We either believe in the dignity of the individual, the rule of law, and the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, or we don’t,” he wrote in the Washington Monthly last year. “There is no middle ground.”

“I’d rather they picked someone from the operations part, but that was probably wishful thinking anyway,” said Drumheller, who added that he thought Panetta would make a fine director. “The people who weren’t tainted by the Bush years were probably too far removed what’s going on.”

Yet few expect Panetta to conduct a purge of the agency over torture — as Porter Goss, the congressman tapped by George W. Bush in 2004, conducted to weed out those considered insufficiently loyalty to Bush’s politics. “It won’t be ‘everyone submit their resignations and I’ll sort it out,’” Drumheller said. “The president might have to sort out senior people, who could go before Congress and explain why they did these things. In part they were following orders.”

Panetta’s announcement did not please everyone. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the incoming chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that will hold Panetta’s confirmation hearing, all but denounced the choice. “I was not informed about the selection of Leon Panetta to be the CIA Director,” Feinstein said Monday afternoon. “I know nothing about this, other than what I’ve read. My position has consistently been that I believe the agency is best-served by having an intelligence professional in charge at this time.” Feinstein spokesman Phil LaVelle said the senator had not yet scheduled a confirmation hearing.

Bob Graham, the former Democratic Florida senator and governor who chaired the Senate intelligence panel from 2001 to 2003, welcomed the Panetta pick. “He’s an extremely able person, having been both in Congress for many terms and as chief of staff for President Clinton,” Graham said. “He understands the needs of users of intelligence. That’s very valuable as he shapes and leads the principle human intelligence agency of the United States.”

Drumheller was more skeptical that experience receiving intelligence from the CIA was particularly relevant for an incoming director. “That doesn’t mean anything,” he said. More important will be an ability to determine whether the agency veterans will try and take advantage of his inexperience. “The problem with the agency is that people will be defending what they’ve done” in the realm of interrogations and detentions, rather than simply explaining it, Drumheller continued. “That’ll waste people’s time, frankly: ‘We did what [WE] did because we were told to by the president.’”

The retired senior CIA official agreed. Panetta will “have to embrace the professionals, but maintain the healthy agnosticism about what he’s being told, particularly early on,” the ex-official said. “I’m not saying they’re dishonest, but sometimes you really have to roll sleeves up, [to avoid agency-led debacles like] the Bay of Pigs and that nonsense.”

All CIA veterans interviewed for this piece agreed that it was imperative Panetta not enter Langley with too many preconceived notions. “Much depends on what his approach is,” said the retired senior official. “If he comes in [with the attitude] to set [the] place right or with an agenda, then he’ll run into a buzzsaw.”

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter

Categories & Tags: National Security| Slot 1/Top Stories| | |



Comment posted January 5, 2009 @ 6:17 pm

Blair has a poor human rights record. Look at what he did in East Timor and Indonesia a decade ago. As militia and Indonesian military violence was escalating in 1999 prior to East Timor's indedpendence referendum, Blair went to Indonesia. Instead of delivering a strong message that the Indonesian military should back off and respect human rights, he offered understanding and further U.S. military assistance.He seems locked into the notion that human rights should be secondary in U.S. relations with other countries. The East Timor and Indonesia Action Network (ETAN) describes this here

Comment posted January 5, 2009 @ 7:12 pm

your blog is very good.and i think your blog is better than mine.
I look forward very much to you visting my blog. my blog is about nike shoes could you give me some suggestion? i would thank you very much.

Impact Travel - Deneb School
Pingback posted January 6, 2009 @ 7:34 am

[...] The Washington Independent » Intel Community Sees Potential in Panetta [...]

Leon Panetta as CIA Director
Pingback posted January 6, 2009 @ 7:39 am

[...] Spencer Ackerman reports that, “initially at least, the Panetta pick has not generated consternation from intelligence veterans, despite his lack of experience with intelligence.”  Why?  “Although there is concern about putting an inexperienced director in place during wartime, some longtime intelligence officials see Panetta’s proximity to Obama as a silver lining, as having a director with Panetta’s close ties to Obama may ensure the agency’s continued relevance.” [...]

Meet Leon Panetta, Obama’s Head Of The CIA « Random Smattering
Pingback posted January 6, 2009 @ 6:13 pm

[...] For more coverage on the Panetta appointment check here. [...]

Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 7:45 pm

This is a great article very informative about technology..

Bhakti Yoga Soul Mate Mystical Baul Kali Krishna
Pingback posted January 8, 2009 @ 7:09 am

[...] The Washington Independent » Intel Community Sees Potential in Panetta [...]

yobas media network
Comment posted March 24, 2009 @ 4:27 am

thanks for sharing I like your article
thank you for additional knowlegde and Idea..

yobas media network
Comment posted March 24, 2009 @ 11:27 am

thanks for sharing I like your article
thank you for additional knowlegde and Idea..

Comment posted February 1, 2010 @ 7:38 pm

A very informative post i've read on this. Very impressive. keep it up

SEO Organic Traffic
Comment posted March 1, 2010 @ 5:16 am

Hmm what another amazing thing technology could bring to humankind.

SEO Organic Traffic
Comment posted March 1, 2010 @ 10:16 am

Hmm what another amazing thing technology could bring to humankind.

Comment posted May 3, 2010 @ 7:10 am

Louboutin received inspiration for his lethal-looking stilettos from an incident that occurred in his early twenties. He had visited a museum and noticed that there was a sign that forbade women to enter while wearing sharp stilettos, for fear of damage to the extensive wood flooring. This image stayed in his mind, and he later used this idea in his designs.I wanted to defy that, Louboutin has said.I wanted to create something that broke rules and made women feel confident and empowered. Christian Louboutin has topped The Luxury Institute's annual Luxury Brand Status Index (LBSI) for three years; the brand's offerings were declared the Most Prestigious Women's shoes in 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Do you want christian louboutin Pumps ?If you buy our Air Jordan 11 you will get our best service and the best selection.This handbags has simple, generous, elegant, casual, giving a feeling of such return, the brand’s design to human nature into the basic,practical and is the foundation.A very special kind of animal shape patterns the Air Jordan 5.Welcome to buy Our products, quality, transport speed, the company has a series of promotions and offers 24-hour online service, as you have any questions, we will help you solve the first time.

Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 1:19 am

You don't wanna know for sure.

nike shoes
Comment posted June 3, 2010 @ 2:06 am

This article and comments have raised some very interesting points.
I'll be checking in on a regularly now….
Keep up the good work!
nike sb

wholesale hats
Comment posted June 3, 2010 @ 7:33 am

it goes some way wholesale hatsto reflecting the <a title=”China wholesale store”

href=””>China wholesale storetruly revolutionary,

louis vuitton
Comment posted August 6, 2010 @ 3:14 pm

Hmm what another amazing thing technology could bring to humankind.

Outsourcing Philippines
Comment posted September 23, 2010 @ 5:40 am

I do agree, it's informative!

supra shoes
Comment posted October 9, 2010 @ 5:44 am

Just wished to say that I read your blog really regularly and I’m at all times amazed at a few of the stuff consumers post below. But keep up the beneficial function, it’s usually helpful.

supra shoes
Comment posted October 9, 2010 @ 5:44 am

Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. My readers have about the same interets

xie tian
Comment posted April 22, 2011 @ 7:15 am

The more you wanna know whether you have forgotten something, the better you remember; I once heard that, the only thing you can do when you no longer have something is not to forget.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.