Keeping Hayden At CIA: Are You Kidding Me?

By
Monday, January 05, 2009 at 10:30 am

The holiday blahs haven’t let up when it comes to who’s getting what job in the new Obama-run intelligence community. No news today on that front, according to the Obama transition. So, as day follows night and pain follows dehydration-inducing New Year’s revelry, it appears that speculating about Mike Hayden staying at CIA isn’t just for House intelligence committee chairmen and anonymous bad-faith intel vets anymore.

My friend Ken Silverstein over at Harper’s talks to an anonymous former CIA official who takes the prospect of Hayden staying seriously. The dude also thinks it’s a terrible idea:

[Hayden's] a safe place holder. But it won’t play well in [the CIA]. He hasn’t earned respect. He’s a four-star airforce general who’s not a pilot or a war guy. He is a really nice guy, he just has no business running the nation’s espionage business. He’s a professional administrator and they need a good case officer. They need a spy to rebuild, restructure, motivate and run the nations spy service. Bush is leaving office, after two terms with the same intelligence questions unanswered that he faced when he arrived? How is this possible?

I know, right? It’s almost like Bush wasn’t interested in intelligence-qua-intelligence, as opposed to intelligence that provided opportunities for cherished visions of the future. Still, it’s interesting to see Hayden pushback that centers on agency antipathy to what he represents, since all the pro-Hayden stuff that’s been floated in the press has portrayed him as commanding fervent loyalty over at Langley.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

2 Comments

bezvodka
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 12:17 pm

Obama has done right in naming an outsider, non-intelligence type. All of the CIA operations pros are complicit in years of illegal, immoral activities including torture, rendition, and so forth, and lying about it repeatedly. Whether or not Panetta can do anything about this endemic wickedness is another matter. Without knowing, I am certain that plenty goes on that the head of the CIA isn't even told about.

The CIA private army should be disbanded, its Air Force likewise, and the agency should stick to intelligence, something it has been very, very bad at though intelligence is the rationale for the existence of the CIA. It is something they do very poorly. The ops types would rather be a government Blackwater/James Bond.


bezvodka
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 8:17 pm

Obama has done right in naming an outsider, non-intelligence type. All of the CIA operations pros are complicit in years of illegal, immoral activities including torture, rendition, and so forth, and lying about it repeatedly. Whether or not Panetta can do anything about this endemic wickedness is another matter. Without knowing, I am certain that plenty goes on that the head of the CIA isn't even told about.

The CIA private army should be disbanded, its Air Force likewise, and the agency should stick to intelligence, something it has been very, very bad at though intelligence is the rationale for the existence of the CIA. It is something they do very poorly. The ops types would rather be a government Blackwater/James Bond.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.