Comments on: Army Censorship Aided Bush

By: squeakrat

squeakrat — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:13:35 +0000

Spencer, the last graf of your block-quote isn't part of Gordon's article. Doesn't have that NYTimes magisterial je ne sais quoi, you know.

By: skulzfontaine

skulzfontaine — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:19:35 +0000

Spencer? You write, "to deny the Army the benefits of learning from the Iraq debacle in order to insulate George W. Bush from criticism is a BETRAYAL of that institutional mission." So wouldn't that "betrayal" be treason? Proper constitutionally defined, treason? Seems pretty damned treasonable to me. But then, how would one separate the treason from the lying from the war crimes from the atrocity and so it seems to go. You offer up some sound journalism so, take your thinking to it's reasonable conclusion.

By: squeakrat

squeakrat — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

Spencer, the last graf of your block-quote isn’t part of Gordon’s article. Doesn’t have that NYTimes magisterial je ne sais quoi, you know.

By: skulzfontaine

skulzfontaine — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

Spencer? You write, "to deny the Army the benefits of learning from the Iraq debacle in order to insulate George W. Bush from criticism is a BETRAYAL of that institutional mission." So wouldn’t that "betrayal" be treason? Proper constitutionally defined, treason? Seems pretty damned treasonable to me. But then, how would one separate the treason from the lying from the war crimes from the atrocity and so it seems to go. You offer up some sound journalism so, take your thinking to it’s reasonable conclusion.