‘Breaking the Will of the Palestinians, of Hamas’

By
Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 9:18 am

So much for the empty-rhetoric option. Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, now in its fourth day, has yielded more than 360 casualties — all of them are Hamas, right? In one of the most densely populated regions on the planet? In a war prosecuted from the air? — and apocalyptic rhetoric from Israeli politicians about crushing Pales– oops, they mean Hamas. Israeli Interior Minister Meer Sheetrit:

“There is no room for a cease-fire.”

“The government is determined to remove the threat of fire on the south,” he said, referring to rocket attacks on southern Israel by Hamas forces. “Therefore the Israeli army must not stop the operation before breaking the will of Palestinians, of Hamas, to continue to fire at Israel.”

What’s fueling Sheetrit’s rhetoric isn’t just the Qassam missile threat to Sderot and neighboring areas of southern Israel, which despite its relentlessness has killed fewer than 20 people since 2001. It’s the prospect of exorcising the ghosts of the 2006 Lebanon invasion that failed to destroy Hezbollah. Hence the rhetoric of not stopping until… well, until some absurd metaphysical condition called “broken will” is achieved. This is not a clear mission. What happens after the bombardment stops and Hamas lobs another Qassam — or, worse, infiltrates a suicide bomber to Sderot or elsewhere? Forty years of occupation couldn’t “break” Palestinian “will.” How much bombardment can do the trick?

Defense Minister Ehud Barak distinguishes himself, though, talking about an “all-out war” to the “bitter end” in advance of his campaign for prime minister. It’s too pat to say that because Barak offered Yasir Arafat a far-reaching peace deal in 2000 that he’s inconsistent for supporting the pummelling of Gaza. Sometimes it’s right to make peace and other times it’s necessary to defend yourself. An “all-out war” that will do neither in the long run, however, is a catastrophe and should bar someone from qualifying for high office.

The United Nations wants a ceasefire. Even the Bush administration wants a ceasefire, though the way it expresses that — “In order for violence to stop, Hamas must stop firing rockets into Israel and agree to respect a sustainable and durable cease-fire,” in spokesman Gordon Johndroe’s words — will sound like capitulation to the Palestinians. The smartest thing Israel can do is arbitrarily declare that Hamas’ will has been broken and stop the bombing.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

14 Comments

Ingrate
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 8:36 am

So as long as its fewer then 20 people, the response is not justified. What about 30? 40? 50? Where do you draw the line. Have the Israeli's sent missles into Gaza without provocation? When Israel is accepted as a Nation, then so will Palestine.


concerned
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 9:29 am

Isrealis are just heartless xenophobes. They want to wipe oup all non Jews from the area.


Mudslide
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 10:44 am

If these rocket attacks had been conducted in any other country such as Great Britain or France would the army there have launched an assault on civilian apartment buildings to get the perpetrators? Why is it different in Palestine? The Palestinians launching these rockets are criminals and need to be caught but not at the expense of 300+ civilians. Israel will never win the help of the Palestinian people like this.


JY66
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 10:45 am

People can't expect Israel to do nothing just because the rockets only caused barelly 20 deaths, could the American people just go on with their everyday life if they constantly woke up thinking maybe today one of Mexico or Canada's (our closest neighbors), rockets may find their mark and myself or one of my family members may lose their lives. Constant fear of an attack is no way to live and fear is how terrorist factions like those of Hamas stay in power.


JY66
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 10:51 am

Israel needs to look first at the protection of their own citizens. they are not trying to kill civilians but when you have factions that surround themselves with innocent bystandards some deaths are unavoidable.


TH
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 10:56 am

So, your saying Isreal does not have a right to protect it's soverignty. Maybe if Palestinian officials would hold Hamas radicals responsible for their murdious crimes and WORK with Isrealie officials instead of having a street party every time a rocket is lauched into Isreal, you know killing fewer 20 people is not insignificant if your an Isrealie. How about reporting some news instead of an opinion for a change.


CBC compiling Canuck tunes for Obama - United Press International | Barack Obama News Blog
Pingback posted December 30, 2008 @ 11:17 am

[...] Breaking The Will of The Palestinians, of Hamas’ – The Washington Independent.comSo much for the empty-rhetoric option. Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, now in its fourth day, has yielded more than 360 casualties — all of them are Hamas, right? In one of the most densely populated regions on the planet? In a war prosecuted from [...]


Breaking The Will of The Palestinians, of Hamas’ - The Washington Independent.com | Business Online Information
Pingback posted December 30, 2008 @ 12:16 pm

[...] Read More … ) Related Tags: empty rhetoric, bombardment, hamas, casualties, [...]


Linda Wenrick
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 2:22 pm

I like the suggestion (above) that war-mongerring — calling for all-out war” — pre-election SHOULD disqualify a candidate. Would that it were so!
How many Palestinians would be alive now is a sobering consideration.
What's the definition of civilization, after all.
Thank you.


Third party
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 11:40 pm

c'mon it's clear the ultimate goal is to “recover” more land and get rid of the palestinians…. Israel is the 5th militar power and are just looking for reasons to use it.


J E Fristad
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 11:56 pm

Looking some ways past Mr Ackerman's rhetoric, the issue isn't whether or not Hamas members have been targeted with absolute precision. Israel's sovereignty continues to be attacked. Palestinians are not just innocently teasing a bunch o' Jews here. The idea is to wage just enough war to maintain their ethnic pride and secure a primacy among the downtrodden Gaza masses. Just that measured threat, surely not enough to justify a full military response. Oh, and the world is watching, right? With its record of siding with anyone but the Jewish state, world opinion continues to be the Palestinians' greatest weapon. The situation becomes, for Israel, a sort of Bart Simpson oxymoron: “Yer damned if ya do, and yer damned if ya don't.” ….If I can expect condemnation regardless of which course I take, I will choose self-preservation. Without hesitation. Particularly if all other choices, sooner or later, deny me that.


Third party
Comment posted December 31, 2008 @ 7:40 am

c'mon it's clear the ultimate goal is to “recover” more land and get rid of the palestinians…. Israel is the 5th militar power and are just looking for reasons to use it.


J E Fristad
Comment posted December 31, 2008 @ 7:56 am

Looking some ways past Mr Ackerman's rhetoric, the issue isn't whether or not Hamas members have been targeted with absolute precision. Israel's sovereignty continues to be attacked. Palestinians are not just innocently teasing a bunch o' Jews here. The idea is to wage just enough war to maintain their ethnic pride and secure a primacy among the downtrodden Gaza masses. Just that measured threat, surely not enough to justify a full military response. Oh, and the world is watching, right? With its record of siding with anyone but the Jewish state, world opinion continues to be the Palestinians' greatest weapon. The situation becomes, for Israel, a sort of Bart Simpson oxymoron: “Yer damned if ya do, and yer damned if ya don't.” ….If I can expect condemnation regardless of which course I take, I will choose self-preservation. Without hesitation. Particularly if all other choices, sooner or later, deny me that.


TPile » Blog Archive » Has Israel Learned From the Hezbollah War?
Pingback posted December 31, 2008 @ 7:28 pm

[...] is supposed to end." (But tell that to the Israeli Interior Minister, who says there is "no room for a cease-fire.") Then Rozen talks to an Arab-American analyst who says Hamas most definitely does have a [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.