The Third Lebanese War Won’t Be in Lebanon
Monday, December 29, 2008 at 4:47 pm
There’s no sugarcoating this. Israel is looking like a country that is quickly losing its mind. Consider this statement:
In an interview Tuesday, Ambassador Gabriela Shalev said Israel’s main goal is to “destroy completely” what she called a “terrorist gang.”
I truly truly hope this is empty rhetoric. Because the evidence is accumulating that Israel is determined to escalate its bombardment of Gaza in the most astrategic ways. Hamas is not the sort of thing that Israel can “destroy completely,” no more than it could wipe out the PLO in 1982 or Hezbollah in 2006. How’d those turn out again?
What Israel can easily do instead is drive Palestinians into Hamas’ hands through collective punishment. These sorts of civilian-casualty heavy overreactions are precisely what jihadist organizations feed on. Israel feels like its deterrent was shaken by its 2006 blunder in Lebanon. Escalating in Gaza will just make that worse.
This is the unforgiving reality of counterterrorism and counterinsurgency. We have seen this movie spool out again and again and again, in Israel, in the West Bank, in Lebanon, in Iraq and now in Gaza. Via Laura Rozen, Zvi Barel has no patience for its ending:
According to the government, Israel has full legitimacy to take action against those who threaten its citizens. That is the reason the state was created and no other country would tolerate such attacks on its towns. It’s a nice slogan, identical to that of Hamas: Why should Gazan citizens tolerate such a long and severe siege for so long? Can its leadership tolerate a succession of targeted killing against its leaders? And what of the killing of innocent civilians in air strikes? Hamas agreed to a cease-fire to end the violent dialogue.
It should be remembered that Israel chanted the same slogans when the Second Lebanon War began, from which it came back badly bruised. The optimistic scenario did not materialize then and it is hard to believe it will now in Gaza. The legitimacy of the Lebanon war triumphed just as the war was lost.
Israel needs to step back from the brink. There is no chance, as long as George W. Bush has almost a month left in office, that the United States will compel it to do so.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
3 Comments
Comment posted December 29, 2008 @ 3:01 pm
I don't think Israel is losing it's mind so much as they *want* to push Palestinians towards Hamas. Israel long ago made the choice to trade a certain amount of internal stability for regional supremacy, in part because the Palestinian terrorists aren't capable of mounting a real existential threat to Israel. So if the choice is between enduring a few rocket attacks and suicide bombers or giving up control of the Jordan headwaters via ceding control of the Golan Heights and the West Bank, Israel will gladly take the former. The sad fact is, however, that this requires the perpetuation of the conflict, because any movement towards peace is going to be accompanied by global demands that Israel give up those territories. That doesn't mean they're crazy, it means they're sticking to a strategy they've been pursuing since roughly 1963, and that most of the world still hasn't caught on to.
Comment posted January 9, 2009 @ 11:36 am
At least Israel had the guts to hit back at Hizbollah, in the Second Lebanese War. I don't see Hizbollah trying to abduct Israeli soldiers any more.
Comment posted January 9, 2009 @ 7:36 pm
At least Israel had the guts to hit back at Hizbollah, in the Second Lebanese War. I don't see Hizbollah trying to abduct Israeli soldiers any more.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss