Comments on: Minnesota Recount: A Note of Caution

By: facebook123

facebook123 — Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:22:37 +0000

Check this out…

[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……

By: Swami_Binkinanda

Swami_Binkinanda — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:10:37 +0000

There is still time for the Federal Supreme Court to put on their Bush kneepads, grease up their coal chutes and from there pull a ruling that counting the votes in a fair and lawful way would hurt Norm Coleman's feelings and make him cry, like they did for Bush.
But the fact is, Coleman already had the help of the GOP's IT fixer to help Coleman steal votes using the digital machines that leave no trail to recount. Even with Coleman's crookedness Franken will win the legal and fair way and the people of Minnesota might get some good representation instead of a crooked placeholder elected by skullduggery and kept in place by sleazery. Conservativism is a conceit and a fantasy, a luxury we can no longer afford as a people or a nation. Time for a national intervention to break this addiction, a Conservatives' Anonymous.

By: Nops

Nops — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:54:28 +0000

I say, to break the tie, put them through the same grueling competition normally reserved for Ms. America. They will have to answer tough questions, and even perform a little floor routine. In the end, the most talented will get the tiara.

Either that or put them in the octagon. In costume.

By: Rich

Rich — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:48:01 +0000

Funny how when Bush did this in 2000 it was considered stealing, and the Democrats and AlGore were victimized; yet when Franken does it it's considered a victory of democracy. Guess it just depends upon which way your media slants…as if there's any doubt about that…

By: PARKER

PARKER — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:35:58 +0000

I GUESS IF YOU RECOUNT ENOUGH TIMES FRANKEN WILL WIN. PATHETIC, MAKES ME SICK!

By: c

Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:25:55 +0000

Franken is stealing this election.

By: Herb

Herb — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:08:35 +0000

How did you define "win".. The person with the most votes or the person who gets the senate seat? What do you do if someone is certified with the most votes but a legal challenge is successful and the senate seats someone but the state calls a revote?

At this point, determining the winner to an absolute certainty is almost statistically impossible, I believe. I doubt either will have a large enough lead to come anywhere near a reasonably conservative margin of error of 0.1%, and 0.1% of 4 million is 4,000 votes.

The recount should be summarily stopped and a revote scheduled immediately, draw lots, or figure some other tie breaking or negotiation out instead of counting them, then suing, then suing again, which either side will do.

Who cares if the law doesn't call for such a scenario, it's the most efficient thing to do to resolve the problem. Whoever loses obviously isn't going to accept that they "lost", and they're going to use "scare quotes" around the "election" of whoever "wins".

I will not say who I support because I know both sides will accuse me of supporting the other side if I don't because both sides would hate this scenario.

By: Dick_Hertz

Dick_Hertz — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:10:37 +0000

By: Nops

Nops — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:54:28 +0000

Either that or put them in the octagon. In costume.

By: Rich

Rich — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:48:01 +0000