<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Does the Status of Forces Agreement Really Mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/22593/what-does-the-status-of-forces-agreement-really-mean/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/22593/what-does-the-status-of-forces-agreement-really-mean</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:41:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Understanding Government &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IRAQ&#8217;S (POSSIBLY) CHANGING POWER DYNAMIC</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/22593/what-does-the-status-of-forces-agreement-really-mean/comment-page-1#comment-28493</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IRAQ&#8217;S (POSSIBLY) CHANGING POWER DYNAMIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=22593#comment-28493</guid>
		<description>[...] The U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement, signed in December, was an effort by Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to exert at least a little control over his country: U.S. military contractors no longer are immune from Iraq law and U.S. soldiers must coordinate all attacks with Iraq authorities. Now Maliki&#8217;s power to enforce SOFA is being tested, reports Charles Levinson and Nada Raad of the Wall Street Journal. On Sunday, American soldiers raided a Shiite, Iranian-affiliated militia that killed two. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement, signed in December, was an effort by Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to exert at least a little control over his country: U.S. military contractors no longer are immune from Iraq law and U.S. soldiers must coordinate all attacks with Iraq authorities. Now Maliki&#8217;s power to enforce SOFA is being tested, reports Charles Levinson and Nada Raad of the Wall Street Journal. On Sunday, American soldiers raided a Shiite, Iranian-affiliated militia that killed two. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ufred</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/22593/what-does-the-status-of-forces-agreement-really-mean/comment-page-1#comment-36137</link>
		<dc:creator>ufred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=22593#comment-36137</guid>
		<description>Why? What need is there for more clarity than the agreement contains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why? What need is there for more clarity than the agreement contains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ufred</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/22593/what-does-the-status-of-forces-agreement-really-mean/comment-page-1#comment-14088</link>
		<dc:creator>ufred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=22593#comment-14088</guid>
		<description>Why? What need is there for more clarity than the agreement contains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why? What need is there for more clarity than the agreement contains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
