Franken Will Soon Overtake Coleman in Minn. Senate Race

By
Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 5:30 pm

UPDATE 6:05 PM: Norm Coleman’s official lead is now down to 5 votes.

—–

It appears that Al Franken is on his way to taking a slim lead over Sen. Norm Coleman by the end of the day or early tomorrow, as the third day of the Minnesota State Canvassing Board’s review of challenged ballots draws to a close.

Coleman’s official lead now stands at 38 votes, and it continues to shrink as more challenges are reviewed.

The board finished reviewing Franken’s challenges this morning, and Coleman’s official lead grew as most of them were rejected. Now it has begun going through Coleman’s challenges, and his lead has diminished at a faster rate than his team had hoped. About 400 Coleman challenges remain.

If Franken continues to net votes at the current rate, my very unofficial prediction is that he will end up with a lead in the high double digits.

And I’ve got some very unofficial confirmation from some very unofficial Star Tribune projections. Given the success rate of the two campaigns’ challenges, the Strib projects that Franken will come out of this process ahead by 90 votes. Readers of the Strib also judged the challenged ballots for themselves, and their average projection put Franken up by 40 votes.

Here’s a chart from the Strib showing where things stand as of 5:25 PM. As you can see, Franken’s challenges have had a much higher success rate (not a huge surprise, since he withdrew many more of his frivolous challenges):

Now, if Franken falls short of the lead, he still has a very good shot at winning this election if the improperly rejected absentee ballots are counted. (The Minnesota Supreme Court is currently deciding on their fate.) These ballots are expected to benefit Franken, perhaps by about 100 votes.

Of course, no matter what the result of the canvass and the Court’s deliberation, we can expect lawsuits galore — no one’s going down without a fight.

Follow Aaron Wiener on Twitter


Comments

6 Comments

J. Sloan
Comment posted December 18, 2008 @ 4:23 pm

Let thte absentee ballots be counted, all of them. This is the Democratic way of getting the right outcome. If Coleman needs to win an election by DENYING THE RIGHT TO VOTE BY NOT COUNTING ALL BALLOTS, then he should not be elected.


Colin
Comment posted December 18, 2008 @ 4:30 pm

Absolutely…what is the chance of this ending back up in court after the recount. Its one thing when you have a recount and you still win be a large margin. Its another when the person trailing wins, and does by a small margin.

Also, why weren't the absentee ballots counted in the first place. Is that saying that you still have the right to vote, but we won't count it unless we actually need to.


C Forebs
Comment posted December 18, 2008 @ 5:54 pm

It's actually routine not to count the absentee votes unless the race is close- which is totally messed up since it's a very specific demographic that they're overlooking; such as students and military personnel. I agree though, there's no reason not to take the extra time to look them over, it can't be that hard.


J. Sloan
Comment posted December 19, 2008 @ 12:23 am

Let thte absentee ballots be counted, all of them. This is the Democratic way of getting the right outcome. If Coleman needs to win an election by DENYING THE RIGHT TO VOTE BY NOT COUNTING ALL BALLOTS, then he should not be elected.


Colin
Comment posted December 19, 2008 @ 12:30 am

Absolutely…what is the chance of this ending back up in court after the recount. Its one thing when you have a recount and you still win be a large margin. Its another when the person trailing wins, and does by a small margin.

Also, why weren't the absentee ballots counted in the first place. Is that saying that you still have the right to vote, but we won't count it unless we actually need to.


C Forebs
Comment posted December 19, 2008 @ 1:54 am

It's actually routine not to count the absentee votes unless the race is close- which is totally messed up since it's a very specific demographic that they're overlooking; such as students and military personnel. I agree though, there's no reason not to take the extra time to look them over, it can't be that hard.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.