<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Need Universal Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/2225/why-we-need-universal-healthcare/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/2225/why-we-need-universal-healthcare</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: warrenmetzler</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/2225/why-we-need-universal-healthcare/comment-page-1#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>warrenmetzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=2225#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>If you believe the American Cancer Society is capable of telling the truth about cancer treatment, I have a bridge in the New York City east river to sell you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s a little known fact about the ACS. They have support groups, people who have received cancer treatment, who provide encouragement and answers to newly diagnosed cancer people. To join a group, you have to promise to not describe any of your personal experiences of treatment. Wonder why?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Medical insurance was begun by physicians in the 1930&#039;s to cover up their passion for  diagnostic tests, which demonstrated not a smidgen of contribution to authentically curative results, but which worked wonders in facilitating the physician&#039;s need to ignore their abysmal results.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The more medical insurance you provide, the more unhealthy people become.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem is conventional medicine&#039;s insistence that illness is caused by pathology (physical body tissues malfunctioning). And that if no pathology can be found, there is no real illness; all &quot;non-real&quot; illnesses being called psychosomatic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are some facts to chew on. In 70 out of every 100 persons who feel ill and visit a physician, no pathology can be found. Which means no curative treatment can be found, and palliation (making the patient temporarily feel better) is all that&#039;s available. If cure is defined as get sick, then are treated, become fully healthy (achieve well-being), treatment is stopped, and the illness doesn&#039;t return, the cure rate for this group is 0%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 6 out of that hundred, pathology is found, and the illness is acute; acute being defined as came on suddenly, gets progressively worse and then goes away (or the person dies, which is a small minority), all over a few week period. In essence the cure rate in this group is 100%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 24 out of that 100 pathology is found and the illness is chronic; meaning lasts for a long time. Curative treatment is available; such treatment being called curative because the pathology is removed or controlled. In every single case, discomforting symptoms continue and progressive increase. In time the physician of everyone with a chronic illness tells that person that physician&#039;s version of the following, &quot;learn to live with this problem, because you will have it until you die&quot;. In this group the cure rate is 0%. So conventional medicine, who gave us health insurance in the first place has a 0% cure rate in 94% of its cases. Which is a failure rate of 94%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Continuing to chase after new diagnosis and treatment techniques in a paradigm which has repeatedly demonstrated a 94% failure rate for over 150 years (modern medicine began in the 1850&#039;s) is the major basis for the steadily increasing cost of health insurance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Warren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe the American Cancer Society is capable of telling the truth about cancer treatment, I have a bridge in the New York City east river to sell you.</p>
<p>Here&#39;s a little known fact about the ACS. They have support groups, people who have received cancer treatment, who provide encouragement and answers to newly diagnosed cancer people. To join a group, you have to promise to not describe any of your personal experiences of treatment. Wonder why?</p>
<p>Medical insurance was begun by physicians in the 1930&#39;s to cover up their passion for  diagnostic tests, which demonstrated not a smidgen of contribution to authentically curative results, but which worked wonders in facilitating the physician&#39;s need to ignore their abysmal results.</p>
<p>The more medical insurance you provide, the more unhealthy people become.</p>
<p>The problem is conventional medicine&#39;s insistence that illness is caused by pathology (physical body tissues malfunctioning). And that if no pathology can be found, there is no real illness; all &quot;non-real&quot; illnesses being called psychosomatic.</p>
<p>Here are some facts to chew on. In 70 out of every 100 persons who feel ill and visit a physician, no pathology can be found. Which means no curative treatment can be found, and palliation (making the patient temporarily feel better) is all that&#39;s available. If cure is defined as get sick, then are treated, become fully healthy (achieve well-being), treatment is stopped, and the illness doesn&#39;t return, the cure rate for this group is 0%.</p>
<p>In 6 out of that hundred, pathology is found, and the illness is acute; acute being defined as came on suddenly, gets progressively worse and then goes away (or the person dies, which is a small minority), all over a few week period. In essence the cure rate in this group is 100%.</p>
<p>In 24 out of that 100 pathology is found and the illness is chronic; meaning lasts for a long time. Curative treatment is available; such treatment being called curative because the pathology is removed or controlled. In every single case, discomforting symptoms continue and progressive increase. In time the physician of everyone with a chronic illness tells that person that physician&#39;s version of the following, &quot;learn to live with this problem, because you will have it until you die&quot;. In this group the cure rate is 0%. So conventional medicine, who gave us health insurance in the first place has a 0% cure rate in 94% of its cases. Which is a failure rate of 94%.</p>
<p>Continuing to chase after new diagnosis and treatment techniques in a paradigm which has repeatedly demonstrated a 94% failure rate for over 150 years (modern medicine began in the 1850&#39;s) is the major basis for the steadily increasing cost of health insurance.</p>
<p>Warren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warrenmetzler</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/2225/why-we-need-universal-healthcare/comment-page-1#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>warrenmetzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=2225#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>If you believe the American Cancer Society is capable of telling the truth about cancer treatment, I have a bridge in the New York City east river to sell you.

Here&#039;s a little known fact about the ACS. They have support groups, people who have received cancer treatment, who provide encouragement and answers to newly diagnosed cancer people. To join a group, you have to promise to not describe any of your personal experiences of treatment. Wonder why?

Medical insurance was begun by physicians in the 1930&#039;s to cover up their passion for  diagnostic tests, which demonstrated not a smidgen of contribution to authentically curative results, but which worked wonders in facilitating the physician&#039;s need to ignore their abysmal results.

The more medical insurance you provide, the more unhealthy people become.

The problem is conventional medicine&#039;s insistence that illness is caused by pathology (physical body tissues malfunctioning). And that if no pathology can be found, there is no real illness; all &quot;non-real&quot; illnesses being called psychosomatic.

Here are some facts to chew on. In 70 out of every 100 persons who feel ill and visit a physician, no pathology can be found. Which means no curative treatment can be found, and palliation (making the patient temporarily feel better) is all that&#039;s available. If cure is defined as get sick, then are treated, become fully healthy (achieve well-being), treatment is stopped, and the illness doesn&#039;t return, the cure rate for this group is 0%.

In 6 out of that hundred, pathology is found, and the illness is acute; acute being defined as came on suddenly, gets progressively worse and then goes away (or the person dies, which is a small minority), all over a few week period. In essence the cure rate in this group is 100%.

In 24 out of that 100 pathology is found and the illness is chronic; meaning lasts for a long time. Curative treatment is available; such treatment being called curative because the pathology is removed or controlled. In every single case, discomforting symptoms continue and progressive increase. In time the physician of everyone with a chronic illness tells that person that physician&#039;s version of the following, &quot;learn to live with this problem, because you will have it until you die&quot;. In this group the cure rate is 0%. So conventional medicine, who gave us health insurance in the first place has a 0% cure rate in 94% of its cases. Which is a failure rate of 94%.

Continuing to chase after new diagnosis and treatment techniques in a paradigm which has repeatedly demonstrated a 94% failure rate for over 150 years (modern medicine began in the 1850&#039;s) is the major basis for the steadily increasing cost of health insurance.

Warren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe the American Cancer Society is capable of telling the truth about cancer treatment, I have a bridge in the New York City east river to sell you.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a little known fact about the ACS. They have support groups, people who have received cancer treatment, who provide encouragement and answers to newly diagnosed cancer people. To join a group, you have to promise to not describe any of your personal experiences of treatment. Wonder why?</p>
<p>Medical insurance was begun by physicians in the 1930&#8242;s to cover up their passion for  diagnostic tests, which demonstrated not a smidgen of contribution to authentically curative results, but which worked wonders in facilitating the physician&#8217;s need to ignore their abysmal results.</p>
<p>The more medical insurance you provide, the more unhealthy people become.</p>
<p>The problem is conventional medicine&#8217;s insistence that illness is caused by pathology (physical body tissues malfunctioning). And that if no pathology can be found, there is no real illness; all &quot;non-real&quot; illnesses being called psychosomatic.</p>
<p>Here are some facts to chew on. In 70 out of every 100 persons who feel ill and visit a physician, no pathology can be found. Which means no curative treatment can be found, and palliation (making the patient temporarily feel better) is all that&#8217;s available. If cure is defined as get sick, then are treated, become fully healthy (achieve well-being), treatment is stopped, and the illness doesn&#8217;t return, the cure rate for this group is 0%.</p>
<p>In 6 out of that hundred, pathology is found, and the illness is acute; acute being defined as came on suddenly, gets progressively worse and then goes away (or the person dies, which is a small minority), all over a few week period. In essence the cure rate in this group is 100%.</p>
<p>In 24 out of that 100 pathology is found and the illness is chronic; meaning lasts for a long time. Curative treatment is available; such treatment being called curative because the pathology is removed or controlled. In every single case, discomforting symptoms continue and progressive increase. In time the physician of everyone with a chronic illness tells that person that physician&#8217;s version of the following, &quot;learn to live with this problem, because you will have it until you die&quot;. In this group the cure rate is 0%. So conventional medicine, who gave us health insurance in the first place has a 0% cure rate in 94% of its cases. Which is a failure rate of 94%.</p>
<p>Continuing to chase after new diagnosis and treatment techniques in a paradigm which has repeatedly demonstrated a 94% failure rate for over 150 years (modern medicine began in the 1850&#8242;s) is the major basis for the steadily increasing cost of health insurance.</p>
<p>Warren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

