Supreme Court Remands Gitmo Torture Damages Case

By
Monday, December 15, 2008 at 11:27 am

The US Supreme Court this morning granted certiorari in the case of Rasul v. Rumsfeld, Myers, et al., the first case in which plaintiffs who claim they were illegally detained, tortured and humiliated at Guantanamo Bay before they were released without charge have claimed civil damages against US officials. Instead of reviewing the case itself, though, it vacated the DC Court of Appeals decision and remanded the case to the court for further review in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in Boumediene v. Bush.The DC Circuit had dismissed the case last January, saying the US officials were immune from suit for torture and that the three British citizens who filed the case are not “persons” protected by the relevant US law.

The three British plaintiffs involved in this case — Shafiq Rasul, Asif Iqbal and Rhuhel Ahmed — claim they traveled to Afghanistan in October 2001 to offer humanitarian relief to civilians displaced by the war. In late November, they were kidnapped by Rashid Dostum, the Uzbeki warlord and leader of the U.S.-supported Northern Alliance. He turned them over to U.S. custody – apparently for bounty money that American officials were paying for suspected terrorists. In December, without any independent evidence that the men had engaged in hostilities against the United States, U.S. officials sent them to Guantanamo Bay. Over the next two years, they claim, they were imprisoned in cages, tortured and humiliated, forced to watch their korans decimated and have their beards shaved, until they were returned to Britain in 2004. None was ever charged with a crime.

Seven months later, the three men, plus another British citizen picked up in Afghanistan and imprisoned at Gitmo, sued former Defense Sec. Donald Rumsfeld and a host of other military commanders for authorizing their torture and violating their religious rights.

In January, the federal appeals court decided that even if all their claims are true, the US officials are immune from suit because, even though torture, physical abuse and humiliation of prisoners violate domestic and international law, the officials were doing all this “within the scope of their employment” and so aren’t personally responsible. They were also immune, the court added, because it wasn’t clear when they authorized the torture that detainees at Guantanamo Bay had rights. As for the men’s religious rights, the court decided that as foreigners, they were not “persons” entitled to the protection of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

As I’ve written before, this case could be the tip of the iceberg — given how many hundreds of people were detained at Gitmo and then released. (Tens of thousands more have been held in Iraq and Afghanistan, at prisons like Abu Ghraib and Bagram — and some of those could try to bring claims as well.)

And as I noted last week, it’s yet another reason for the new administration to quickly appoint an investigatory commission, with the authority not only to prosecute those who committed and authorized crimes, but to compensate the victims.

Comments

14 Comments

muscle cars
Comment posted January 26, 2009 @ 12:40 am

It doesn't get them to tell the truth, they could have easiy planned something to say that is entirely false. I've always reccomended using a polygraph. They are pretty accurate, whereas torture is primitive and very inaccurate. Someone's gotta disagree with me otherwise gitmo wouldn't be a torture chamber, so can you please exlain why you disagree with me?


Jeanine R Brown
Comment posted February 3, 2009 @ 9:35 pm

Excellent, entertaining, useful reading, Thanks !!


Cathleen Ross
Comment posted February 12, 2009 @ 6:09 pm

When we were writing The Power of Nice, we uncovered many facts on how nice behavior can benefit your life.


Brian Ashton
Comment posted February 15, 2009 @ 10:33 pm

nice article dude


low carb diet plan
Trackback posted October 4, 2010 @ 9:14 am

Thank you……

Wow very charming sharing. Appreciation pro this….


high protein diet plan
Trackback posted November 10, 2010 @ 9:52 am

Healthy diet plan…

On behalf of a sustained era, I am looking an place of duty like such a subject matter. Right now I give rise to found it. Thank you on behalf of your sharing, chap!…


Low Fat Diet
Trackback posted November 25, 2010 @ 12:56 am

Healthy diet plan…

My name is Piter Jankovich. oOnly want to tell, that your blog is really cool And want to ask you: is this blog your hobby?P.S. Sorry for my bad english…


kids toys
Trackback posted January 2, 2011 @ 2:50 pm

Buy Soft Toys & Childrens Toy online now!…

Very good, i like you.And say and say ………. It’s greatttttttttttt………..


family travel deals
Trackback posted February 6, 2011 @ 9:42 am

The Best Family Vacation Ideas – For Family Vocations…

thanks for posting. Great article….


Groorceimpole
Comment posted September 2, 2011 @ 10:47 pm

ccccccccccccccc


vardresee
Comment posted September 3, 2011 @ 9:25 am

Want good backlinking and seo for your site? Than go here

backlink seo


dieta cu fructe de 3 zile
Comment posted September 4, 2011 @ 8:09 am

I was been trying to find the Internet for such information and just wanted to say thanks to you for this post. Also, just off topic, where can i download a copy of this theme? – Thanks


Loareepinna
Comment posted September 4, 2011 @ 10:34 am

As Embarrassing as it is to have to go to the store and buy Hemorrhoids Relief Cream Why not just buy

it online? You can get it for what $10? And it goes right to your door! Try it out! You will not be upset at this service.

hemorrhoids cure


best mobile phone plans
Comment posted September 4, 2011 @ 7:11 pm

I became honored to receive a call from my friend as he identified the important tips shared on the site. Browsing your blog posting is a real excellent experience. Thank you for considering readers at all like me, and I desire for you the best of achievements for a professional realm.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.