<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women Are Dumb, Inconsequential</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/2114/women-are-dumb-inconsequential/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/2114/women-are-dumb-inconsequential</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:31:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: llola</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/2114/women-are-dumb-inconsequential/comment-page-1#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator>llola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=2114#comment-3426</guid>
		<description>When I got to Ms. Allen&#039;s pseudo-scientific analysis of the female brain (&quot;... make one wonder whether there isn&#039;t some genetic aspect of the female brain ... that turns the pre-frontal cortex into Cream of Wheat ...&quot;), I had to find out who this person is. This is from her Web site:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Unfortunately, it would appear at this point that I have been involuntarily retired. I have neither an agent nor a publisher. Currently, the quality of writing has very little to do with what gets published.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Ms. Allen&#039;s case, I&#039;m afraid that the quality of her writing and analyses has everything to do with why she has no agent or publisher.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m a neurobiologist, so I must come clean and admit that one of my pet peeves is fake scientific analyses that present themselves as fact. I&#039;m also a woman and not dumb and not swooning--and I support Senator Obama. Women scientists who came of age in the early 1980&#039;s have realized that it isn&#039;t enough for a woman just to become a scientist--it is necessary to be a good, successful scientist. So we don&#039;t feel obligated to vote for a candidate just because she is a woman. I will vote for Senator Clinton if she is the Democratic nominee. But I have chosen to back Senator Obama because I think he is the braver of the two--I feel he is less likely to spend his first term as president making decisions that will ensure him a second term. I also feel that it is time for the baby boomers to step aside and allow a new, less self-absorbed generation to take the reigns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the record, absolutely no swooning took place while I made my decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I got to Ms. Allen&#39;s pseudo-scientific analysis of the female brain (&quot;&#8230; make one wonder whether there isn&#39;t some genetic aspect of the female brain &#8230; that turns the pre-frontal cortex into Cream of Wheat &#8230;&quot;), I had to find out who this person is. This is from her Web site:</p>
<p>&quot;Unfortunately, it would appear at this point that I have been involuntarily retired. I have neither an agent nor a publisher. Currently, the quality of writing has very little to do with what gets published.&quot;</p>
<p>In Ms. Allen&#39;s case, I&#39;m afraid that the quality of her writing and analyses has everything to do with why she has no agent or publisher.</p>
<p>I&#39;m a neurobiologist, so I must come clean and admit that one of my pet peeves is fake scientific analyses that present themselves as fact. I&#39;m also a woman and not dumb and not swooning&#8211;and I support Senator Obama. Women scientists who came of age in the early 1980&#39;s have realized that it isn&#39;t enough for a woman just to become a scientist&#8211;it is necessary to be a good, successful scientist. So we don&#39;t feel obligated to vote for a candidate just because she is a woman. I will vote for Senator Clinton if she is the Democratic nominee. But I have chosen to back Senator Obama because I think he is the braver of the two&#8211;I feel he is less likely to spend his first term as president making decisions that will ensure him a second term. I also feel that it is time for the baby boomers to step aside and allow a new, less self-absorbed generation to take the reigns.</p>
<p>For the record, absolutely no swooning took place while I made my decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llola</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/2114/women-are-dumb-inconsequential/comment-page-1#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator>llola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=2114#comment-1907</guid>
		<description>When I got to Ms. Allen&#039;s pseudo-scientific analysis of the female brain (&quot;... make one wonder whether there isn&#039;t some genetic aspect of the female brain ... that turns the pre-frontal cortex into Cream of Wheat ...&quot;), I had to find out who this person is. This is from her Web site:

&quot;Unfortunately, it would appear at this point that I have been involuntarily retired. I have neither an agent nor a publisher. Currently, the quality of writing has very little to do with what gets published.&quot;

In Ms. Allen&#039;s case, I&#039;m afraid that the quality of her writing and analyses has everything to do with why she has no agent or publisher.

I&#039;m a neurobiologist, so I must come clean and admit that one of my pet peeves is fake scientific analyses that present themselves as fact. I&#039;m also a woman and not dumb and not swooning--and I support Senator Obama. Women scientists who came of age in the early 1980&#039;s have realized that it isn&#039;t enough for a woman just to become a scientist--it is necessary to be a good, successful scientist. So we don&#039;t feel obligated to vote for a candidate just because she is a woman. I will vote for Senator Clinton if she is the Democratic nominee. But I have chosen to back Senator Obama because I think he is the braver of the two--I feel he is less likely to spend his first term as president making decisions that will ensure him a second term. I also feel that it is time for the baby boomers to step aside and allow a new, less self-absorbed generation to take the reigns.

For the record, absolutely no swooning took place while I made my decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I got to Ms. Allen&#8217;s pseudo-scientific analysis of the female brain (&quot;&#8230; make one wonder whether there isn&#8217;t some genetic aspect of the female brain &#8230; that turns the pre-frontal cortex into Cream of Wheat &#8230;&quot;), I had to find out who this person is. This is from her Web site:</p>
<p>&quot;Unfortunately, it would appear at this point that I have been involuntarily retired. I have neither an agent nor a publisher. Currently, the quality of writing has very little to do with what gets published.&quot;</p>
<p>In Ms. Allen&#8217;s case, I&#8217;m afraid that the quality of her writing and analyses has everything to do with why she has no agent or publisher.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a neurobiologist, so I must come clean and admit that one of my pet peeves is fake scientific analyses that present themselves as fact. I&#8217;m also a woman and not dumb and not swooning&#8211;and I support Senator Obama. Women scientists who came of age in the early 1980&#8217;s have realized that it isn&#8217;t enough for a woman just to become a scientist&#8211;it is necessary to be a good, successful scientist. So we don&#8217;t feel obligated to vote for a candidate just because she is a woman. I will vote for Senator Clinton if she is the Democratic nominee. But I have chosen to back Senator Obama because I think he is the braver of the two&#8211;I feel he is less likely to spend his first term as president making decisions that will ensure him a second term. I also feel that it is time for the baby boomers to step aside and allow a new, less self-absorbed generation to take the reigns.</p>
<p>For the record, absolutely no swooning took place while I made my decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
