Drug Policy ‘Buck’ Stops With Obama, Too

By
Wednesday, December 03, 2008 at 4:20 pm

Politico reports that a coalition of advocacy organizations, including the National Black Police Association, has sent a letter to President-elect Barack Obama opposing the appointment of Rep. James Ramstad (R-Minn.) to lead the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Ramstad, who is a recovering alcoholic, has been mentioned as a possible choice to direct the federal drug control policy as “drug czar.”

The coalition cites Ramstad’s past opposition to federal funding of needle exchange programs for intravenous drug users, as well as his opposition to legalized medical marijuana, and his failure to support eliminating sentencing disparities for crimes concerning crack and powder cocaine — which critics say disproportionately target African-Americans.

From the letter:

While we applaud Representative Ramstad for his courageous and steady support for expanding drug treatment access and improving addiction awareness, and honor his own personal and very public triumph over addiction, we have strong reservations about his candidacy for the drug czar position. In his twenty-eight years in the U.S. House, Representative Ramstad has consistently opposed policies that seek to reduce drug-related harm and create common ground on polarizing issues.

Representative Ramstad voted in 1998 in favor of making permanent the federal funding ban on syringe exchange, voted in 2000 to prohibit the District of Columbia from spending its own locally raised funds on syringe exchange programs and voted in 2007 against lifting the same DC ban, despite decades of research showing that syringe exchange programs reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS without increase drug use. Rep. Ramstad has also consistently opposed congressional efforts to stop the arrest of HIV/AIDS, cancer and other patients who use medical marijuana to ease their pain and suffering in states where it is legal.

Unlike you and Vice President-elect Biden, Rep. Ramstad has also failed to cosponsor any legislation eliminating the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, despite the fact that there were four different crack/powder reform bills before the U.S. House in the 110th Congress. A number of recent studies have found that long prison sentences are one factor driving disproportionate rates of HIV/AIDS infections in communities of color. A primary task of the next drug czar should be to deal with this and other issues related to overincarceration.

The coalition includes numerous AIDS-prevention and drug policy reform organizations.

Admittedly, I know almost nothing about Ramstad. If the letter accurately states his positions, he’s probably a poor choice to direct the new administration’s drug control policy.

However, if Obama is determined to put a bipartisan face on his anti-drug efforts, reformers may have several reasons to remain optimistic.

First, Obama and pending Senate confirmation, his nominee for attorney general, Eric Holder, are African-Americans who are very probably tuned in to the concerns of the black community regarding injustices within the legal system. Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean they will be radical reformers, but they are certainly aware that the nation’s drug laws are a major reason black men are three times more likely to go to prison than college.

Second, Obama has publicly expressed his support for federal funding for needle exchange programs; legalized medical marijuana, albeit with conditions; and opposition to federal mandatory minimum sentences, like those that apply to crack cocaine — but no other illegal drug.

Finally, and most important, there is this comment Obama made Monday at a press conference in which he named his foreign policy team:

I will be setting policy as president. I will be responsible for the vision that this team carries out, and I expect them to implement that vision once decisions are made. As Harry Truman said, “The buck will stop with me.”

Presumably, this will apply to all aspects of the new administration’s domestic and foreign policy, including drug control.

Comments

29 Comments

ajm8127
Comment posted December 3, 2008 @ 3:30 pm

I think this is a big area where America needs a more progressive approach. The government keeps throwing money at the War on Drugs to “keep people safe”, but really all it does is create a black market for drug trade. As with any black market, it is completely unable to be regulated, and always turns violent if enough money is injected into the system. The scarcer drugs get because of busts, the more the price of drugs go up (supply and demand), and the more is on the line for these people trafficking them.This guy seems like one of those people who would berate occasional recreational marijuana users, but he himself couldn't keep his alcohol use recreational.


End the Prohibition
Comment posted December 4, 2008 @ 4:51 am

The Federal Marijuana Prohibition: Is it holding you back?

This year alone the Mexican Drug Cartels have murdered more than 5,000 people, primarily to protect their cash flow from illicit marijuana sales in the US. Sales made possible only due to the presence of the Federal Marijuana Prohibition that prevents reputable businesses from legally selling marijuana to adults.

If you were one of the 5,031 people killed by the Cartels this year, probably you were also decapitated or dismembered to ensure they got their message across, or maybe you were the 5-yr old boy whose heart they injected with acid, then you could legitimately say that the Federal Marijuana Prohibition is holding you back.

But maybe it was the other great benefiter of the prohibition that had a negative impact on your life. Maybe you were one of the 2,000 people our Law Enforcement personnel arrested every *day* for marijuana-related offenses. The vast majority for doing nothing more than what alcohol drinkers and cigarette smokers do every day. If you were one of the people arrested for possessing the safest recreational drug on the planet while your alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking friends were able to consume their addictive and deadly drugs of choice with impunity, then you too could say that the Federal Marijuana Prohibition is holding you back.

There is something terribly WRONG when the DEA and the Mexican Drug Cartels agree that the marijuana prohibition is a good thing. Somebody on our side has made a BIG mistake.


Douglas Willinger
Comment posted December 4, 2008 @ 6:07 am

Ramstad appears to be another 'insider' chosen for his connections rather then his true worth;

http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/20…


Matthew DeLong
Comment posted December 4, 2008 @ 9:31 am

Aside from your last sentence, which I can't comment on because I don't know enough about Ramstad to judge, I agree whole-heartedly with everything you said. One are the Obama administration could make dramatic changes is drug policy reform. However, with so much federal money being spent and the constituencies that develop whenever the federal government throws money around foolishly, reform may be very difficult, especially without appearing “soft on crime.” Still, I'm hopeful Obama will have the courage to expend political capital on formulating a sensible drug policy.


Drug detox
Comment posted February 2, 2009 @ 10:11 am

The right thing to do is judge the man upon his professional aptitudes, not upon his drinking episode in the past. If he was an alcoholic then he learned a valuable lesson about addiction and I don't think this would be such a bad thing for his current position. If he proved failure in the past concerning political approaches on drugs, then I doubt he is the right person for this kind of position.


Elsie M Aiken
Comment posted February 3, 2009 @ 11:13 pm

Excellent, entertaining, useful reading, Thanks !!


Helen Atwood
Comment posted February 16, 2009 @ 12:37 am

your blog is awsome


Addiction
Comment posted February 27, 2009 @ 5:58 am

Substance abuse is an issue that requires much more attention these days.


caroll
Comment posted March 23, 2009 @ 2:22 pm

Considering the recent failure of the War on Drugs I think it would be wise to vote the right person to lead to lead. I don't think Rmastad is the wisest choice, not only because of his past with alcohol but also because of his current position on drug policies…
Caroll, Cliffside counselor


Dan Callahan
Comment posted May 26, 2009 @ 1:18 pm

substance abuse in general is something that is consistently overlooked as to how it should be treated. There are many theories out there and only about a hand full are accurate.

Dan Callahan
Alcohol Rehab


Dan Callahan
Comment posted May 26, 2009 @ 8:18 pm

substance abuse in general is something that is consistently overlooked as to how it should be treated. There are many theories out there and only about a hand full are accurate.

Dan Callahan
Alcohol Rehab


Dan V.
Comment posted June 26, 2009 @ 3:23 pm

It’s a shame that the pres. is just going to pay lip service to the notion of drug policy without actually paying any attention to the preventative measures that could be taken. We’re losing the drug war in a terrible way. I really hope we’ll see a resurgence of the enthusiasm for the effort – both preventative and otherwise – so that we can reclaim the health of our youth from prescription drug addiction
Dan V.


Todd S.
Comment posted June 26, 2009 @ 6:52 pm

Obama may say the “buck” stops with him for drug policy, but historically this has been an issue for the states to manage themselves. Especially when it comes to our youth, the policy has to be lenient enough to allow for proper rehabilitation.

Todd S.
Teen Drug Rehab


drugtreatment
Comment posted June 27, 2009 @ 4:44 am

This is an interesting debate. On the one hand, you have a person who is opposed to many potential life-saving programs that could benefit drug addicts in a number of ways. On the other hand, this person IS a recovering addict, which for my money makes him an outstanding choice to take the office. Who would know better about drugs and addiction than an individual who has
lived through it?


prevention_addiction
Comment posted September 30, 2009 @ 9:51 am

Oh!…that's great helpful, it's so right to me! Million thanks for the article,


jeet020
Comment posted October 11, 2009 @ 8:05 pm

Very interesting post, very helpful for me and others.

I must say you and all to visit once following blog:
http://alcoholrehabblog.blogspot.com/

Great alcohol rehab Blog.


giminicologu
Comment posted November 25, 2009 @ 8:52 am

I dunno why so many are opposing the new appointment , when who better to control drugs and addiction the a man that knows exactly how it feels and what amazing results Narconon Vistabay can offer for addicts


james
Comment posted January 19, 2010 @ 1:33 pm

although some people might oppose the appointment of James Ramstad for the National Drug Control Policy but we have to remember he is an recovering addict who been through this nightmare & knows everything drugs & addiction.but also we have to remember to stop drug addiction completely we cant just rely only on federal government & sitting idly doing nothing.we have to step up & do something to contribute on this war against drug just like <a href=”%20%20%3Ctd%20height=17%20class=xl24%20width=536%20style='height:12.75pt;width:402pt'%3Ehttp:/brightkite.com/people/Vistabay/config?section=profile</td>” rel=”follow”>Narconon Vista Bayis offering great help for addicts


charles
Comment posted January 19, 2010 @ 1:49 pm

James Ramstad as a recovering addict will be a good choice for the National Drug Control Policy office as he knows what drug addiction is.also individual & organization like Narconon Vista Bay has to step up to help those drug addicts if we want to stop drug addiction completely.


franklin
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 2:28 am

i dont understand whats fuss about this? to my judgment James Ramstad would be a better choice for to lead the Office of National Drug Control Policy considering as a former alchoholic & now he is recovering from addiction.who could lead anti drug office better then a recovering drug addict.also every individual & private organisation has to come forward to stop this problem just like Narconon Vista Bayis doing for addict people.


charles
Comment posted January 23, 2010 @ 10:24 am

although some people might be skeptical about appointing James Ramstad to lead the anti drug office but from my perspective he will be a better choice considering as a former alchoholic.also like to mention that our anti drug organisation has so far failed to give us a positive result when its come to drug controlling & hopefully James Ramstad with his prior knowledge in this particular area will bring us some good news after all.also i agree with franklin that just like every other individual & private organisation has to come forward if we want to see our future generation without drugs.


charles
Comment posted January 23, 2010 @ 3:24 pm

although some people might be skeptical about appointing James Ramstad to lead the anti drug office but from my perspective he will be a better choice considering as a former alchoholic.also like to mention that our anti drug organisation has so far failed to give us a positive result when its come to drug controlling & hopefully James Ramstad with his prior knowledge in this particular area will bring us some good news after all.also i agree with franklin that just like every other individual & private organisation has to come forward if we want to see our future generation without drugs.


dragos_ionut2004
Comment posted May 30, 2010 @ 4:03 pm

thank you


DrugLord
Comment posted July 17, 2010 @ 7:50 pm

I don't think it matters so much who is in charge of the anti drug office as long as he is doing what is right.Drugs are dangerous and they need to be erased once and for all.

_______________________________________________________________
best drug rehabilitation


AndrewHobs
Comment posted July 24, 2010 @ 4:50 pm

While they are arguing, we are still dealing with this disease which is drug addiction. I am now a recovering addict who has spent the last three weeks in a Christian based drug rehab center. I am still coping with the craving but I am not sure for how long.


Diawork1
Comment posted August 27, 2010 @ 7:34 pm

Why are people still using drugs!? What is the fun in all of it? The biggest problem is not who is in charge but what does he do and if his solving the drug problems in America. The country is investing in Drug Rehabs in Washington centers and many others. There is no shame to recover from some addiction, but to be judge for it… it's not humane.


electronic cigarette
Comment posted September 4, 2010 @ 8:40 am

This is an interesting debate. On the one hand, you have a person who is opposed to many potential life-saving programs that could benefit drug addicts in a number of ways. On the other hand, this person IS a recovering addict, which for my money makes him an outstanding choice to take the office. Who would know better about drugs and addiction than an individual who has


Frank
Comment posted November 13, 2010 @ 1:14 pm

If the government would put a percentage of the war on drug budget towards treatment they would have a much smaller problem to deal with. Quite simple actually, reduce the market and the dealers have less people to sell to. Alcohol Rehab


Anonymous
Comment posted May 17, 2011 @ 6:15 am

 The effects of Crack are similar to those of Cocaine, although since
Crack is smoked, additional risks exist. General effects include
constricted blood vessels and increased temperature, heart rate, and
blood pressure, restlessness, irritability, anxiety, and with long term
use, violence and paranoia are noted. Additional risks of smoking crack
include respiratory problems such as shortness of breath, chest pains,
lung trauma and bleeding. As with cocaine, crack is highly addictive.
Evidence shows that when cocaine and crack are smoked (as opposed to
other methods), there is increased risk of compulsive cocaine-seeking
behavior.Crack Cocaine Addiction


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.