<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s the Energy Secretary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/20394/wheres-the-energy-secretary/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/20394/wheres-the-energy-secretary</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:45:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Robert BEHRMAN</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/20394/wheres-the-energy-secretary/comment-page-1#comment-38232</link>
		<dc:creator>John Robert BEHRMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=20394#comment-38232</guid>
		<description>Spencer,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not disappointed about the delay. No rush: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The DoE is pretty marginal when it comes to actual energy policy compared to the rest of the DoD, even the Navy Department, Interior, State, Treasury, even the god-forsaken Commerce Department  ....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, &quot;Stick A Windmill On It&quot; is not really an energy policy. First, we need a thinker, like James Schlesinger was and Granger Morgan (CMU) is -- someone who can think like an economist-engineer, not a bond-lawyer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is precedent for this in the New Deal. To be sure, that was financially simpler than what we face today. Inside the Beltway, Tommy Corcoran is best remembered. But, part of it was actual and effective, usually secret, military-industrial policy. Look at what John Kenneth Galbraith, Lucius D. Clay, Will Clayton did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everybody named today is going to be working in what are called &quot;silos&quot;. But, energy policy, like counter-terrorism, cannot work that way. It will just degenerate into bi-partisan concession-tending, financial cronyism, rank protectionism, aka Congressional pork and executive corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spencer,</p>
<p>I am not disappointed about the delay. No rush: </p>
<p>The DoE is pretty marginal when it comes to actual energy policy compared to the rest of the DoD, even the Navy Department, Interior, State, Treasury, even the god-forsaken Commerce Department  &#8230;.</p>
<p>In any case, &#8220;Stick A Windmill On It&#8221; is not really an energy policy. First, we need a thinker, like James Schlesinger was and Granger Morgan (CMU) is &#8212; someone who can think like an economist-engineer, not a bond-lawyer.</p>
<p>There is precedent for this in the New Deal. To be sure, that was financially simpler than what we face today. Inside the Beltway, Tommy Corcoran is best remembered. But, part of it was actual and effective, usually secret, military-industrial policy. Look at what John Kenneth Galbraith, Lucius D. Clay, Will Clayton did.</p>
<p>Everybody named today is going to be working in what are called &#8220;silos&#8221;. But, energy policy, like counter-terrorism, cannot work that way. It will just degenerate into bi-partisan concession-tending, financial cronyism, rank protectionism, aka Congressional pork and executive corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Robert BEHRMAN</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/20394/wheres-the-energy-secretary/comment-page-1#comment-13265</link>
		<dc:creator>John Robert BEHRMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=20394#comment-13265</guid>
		<description>Spencer,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not disappointed about the delay. No rush: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The DoE is pretty marginal when it comes to actual energy policy compared to the rest of the DoD, even the Navy Department, Interior, State, Treasury, even the god-forsaken Commerce Department  ....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, &quot;Stick A Windmill On It&quot; is not really an energy policy. First, we need a thinker, like James Schlesinger was and Granger Morgan (CMU) is -- someone who can think like an economist-engineer, not a bond-lawyer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is precedent for this in the New Deal. To be sure, that was financially simpler than what we face today. Inside the Beltway, Tommy Corcoran is best remembered. But, part of it was actual and effective, usually secret, military-industrial policy. Look at what John Kenneth Galbraith, Lucius D. Clay, Will Clayton did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everybody named today is going to be working in what are called &quot;silos&quot;. But, energy policy, like counter-terrorism, cannot work that way. It will just degenerate into bi-partisan concession-tending, financial cronyism, rank protectionism, aka Congressional pork and executive corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spencer,</p>
<p>I am not disappointed about the delay. No rush: </p>
<p>The DoE is pretty marginal when it comes to actual energy policy compared to the rest of the DoD, even the Navy Department, Interior, State, Treasury, even the god-forsaken Commerce Department  &#8230;.</p>
<p>In any case, &#8220;Stick A Windmill On It&#8221; is not really an energy policy. First, we need a thinker, like James Schlesinger was and Granger Morgan (CMU) is &#8212; someone who can think like an economist-engineer, not a bond-lawyer.</p>
<p>There is precedent for this in the New Deal. To be sure, that was financially simpler than what we face today. Inside the Beltway, Tommy Corcoran is best remembered. But, part of it was actual and effective, usually secret, military-industrial policy. Look at what John Kenneth Galbraith, Lucius D. Clay, Will Clayton did.</p>
<p>Everybody named today is going to be working in what are called &#8220;silos&#8221;. But, energy policy, like counter-terrorism, cannot work that way. It will just degenerate into bi-partisan concession-tending, financial cronyism, rank protectionism, aka Congressional pork and executive corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
