Comments on: Obama to Name New Economic Recovery Team http://washingtonindependent.com/20153/obama-to-name-new-economic-recovery-team National News in Context Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:49:13 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jason http://washingtonindependent.com/20153/obama-to-name-new-economic-recovery-team/comment-page-1#comment-35957 Jason Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:59:30 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=20153#comment-35957 What is wrong with giving the American household a check for $13,000? The $13,000 would do much better in the people’s hands. The $13,000 is less than the government is spending on the original bailout and the new proposed $800 billion. If an economic advisory board cannot put the people before their selfish reasons something is very wrong. If the people had the money they would spend it and then jobs would be added, manufacturing would grow, and last but not least the states would gain money in the form of sales taxes not to mention the added income taxes from the extra workers.<br><br><a href="http://nomedals.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://nomedals.blogspot.com</a> What is wrong with giving the American household a check for $13,000? The $13,000 would do much better in the people’s hands. The $13,000 is less than the government is spending on the original bailout and the new proposed $800 billion. If an economic advisory board cannot put the people before their selfish reasons something is very wrong. If the people had the money they would spend it and then jobs would be added, manufacturing would grow, and last but not least the states would gain money in the form of sales taxes not to mention the added income taxes from the extra workers.

http://nomedals.blogspot.com

]]> By: Jason http://washingtonindependent.com/20153/obama-to-name-new-economic-recovery-team/comment-page-1#comment-13058 Jason Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:59:30 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=20153#comment-13058 What is wrong with giving the American household a check for $13,000? The $13,000 would do much better in the people’s hands. The $13,000 is less than the government is spending on the original bailout and the new proposed $800 billion. If an economic advisory board cannot put the people before their selfish reasons something is very wrong. If the people had the money they would spend it and then jobs would be added, manufacturing would grow, and last but not least the states would gain money in the form of sales taxes not to mention the added income taxes from the extra workers.<br><br><a href="http://nomedals.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://nomedals.blogspot.com</a> What is wrong with giving the American household a check for $13,000? The $13,000 would do much better in the people’s hands. The $13,000 is less than the government is spending on the original bailout and the new proposed $800 billion. If an economic advisory board cannot put the people before their selfish reasons something is very wrong. If the people had the money they would spend it and then jobs would be added, manufacturing would grow, and last but not least the states would gain money in the form of sales taxes not to mention the added income taxes from the extra workers.

http://nomedals.blogspot.com

]]>