Obama to Name New Economic Recovery Team
Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 9:41 am
One thing is for sure, the Obama White House is not going to be hurting for economic advisers.
Politico reports that at his third press conference in as many days in Chicago today, President-elect Barack Obama is expected to announce the creation of a new economic recovery advisory board, to be headed by former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker.
The officials said the idea came from Obama, who wanted to preserve the advisory structure he had come to appreciate over the course of the campaign. The new body also reflects the magnitude of the nation’s economic problems, which Obama wants to solve in an integrated way – not just through attention to markets, but also to jobs, wages and housing foreclosure.
The economic recovery board’s staff director and chief economist will be Austan Goolsbee, who was senior economic adviser to the Obama campaign and will also be a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
The other board members – eight to 16 people of a caliber of Eric E. Schmidt, chairman and CEO of Google Inc. – will be named later.
The board initially will exist for two years, but might well be extended for longer. Transition advisers expect it might meet roughly once a month.
With Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner; National Economic Council Director Larry Summers; the three-person White House Council of Economic Advisers, headed by Berkeley economics professor Christina Romer; Domestic Policy Council Director Melody Barnes; and now this huge new team, Obama will have no shortage of brainpower to turn to for economic advice.
The new president may prove once and for all whether surrounding himself with an army of eggheads is an effective strategy for solving the nation’s toughest problems, or if it makes decision-making that much more difficult.
2 Comments
Comment posted November 26, 2008 @ 3:59 pm
What is wrong with giving the American household a check for $13,000? The $13,000 would do much better in the people’s hands. The $13,000 is less than the government is spending on the original bailout and the new proposed $800 billion. If an economic advisory board cannot put the people before their selfish reasons something is very wrong. If the people had the money they would spend it and then jobs would be added, manufacturing would grow, and last but not least the states would gain money in the form of sales taxes not to mention the added income taxes from the extra workers.
Comment posted November 26, 2008 @ 11:59 pm
What is wrong with giving the American household a check for $13,000? The $13,000 would do much better in the people’s hands. The $13,000 is less than the government is spending on the original bailout and the new proposed $800 billion. If an economic advisory board cannot put the people before their selfish reasons something is very wrong. If the people had the money they would spend it and then jobs would be added, manufacturing would grow, and last but not least the states would gain money in the form of sales taxes not to mention the added income taxes from the extra workers.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss