<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pawlenty Sees No Fraud in Minnesota Recount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/18840/pawlenty-sees-no-fraud-in-minnesota-recount/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18840/pawlenty-sees-no-fraud-in-minnesota-recount</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:55:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: esblofeld</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18840/pawlenty-sees-no-fraud-in-minnesota-recount/comment-page-1#comment-37173</link>
		<dc:creator>esblofeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18840#comment-37173</guid>
		<description>There was no evidence of voter fraud with ACORN either, jackass. There was voter REGISTRATION fraud that ACORN itself reported in accordance with the law and never resulted in voter fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no evidence of voter fraud with ACORN either, jackass. There was voter REGISTRATION fraud that ACORN itself reported in accordance with the law and never resulted in voter fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenkins</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18840/pawlenty-sees-no-fraud-in-minnesota-recount/comment-page-1#comment-37174</link>
		<dc:creator>jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18840#comment-37174</guid>
		<description>how funny. When ACORN was the issue, actual evidence of fraud was irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how funny. When ACORN was the issue, actual evidence of fraud was irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esblofeld</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18840/pawlenty-sees-no-fraud-in-minnesota-recount/comment-page-1#comment-12241</link>
		<dc:creator>esblofeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18840#comment-12241</guid>
		<description>There was no evidence of voter fraud with ACORN either, jackass. There was voter REGISTRATION fraud that ACORN itself reported in accordance with the law and never resulted in voter fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no evidence of voter fraud with ACORN either, jackass. There was voter REGISTRATION fraud that ACORN itself reported in accordance with the law and never resulted in voter fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenkins</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18840/pawlenty-sees-no-fraud-in-minnesota-recount/comment-page-1#comment-12238</link>
		<dc:creator>jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18840#comment-12238</guid>
		<description>how funny. When ACORN was the issue, actual evidence of fraud was irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how funny. When ACORN was the issue, actual evidence of fraud was irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
