Comments on: Ensuring Permanence

By: 2000

2000 — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:49:22 +0000

By: Joy Enamavu

Joy Enamavu — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:12:07 +0000

Arabs are cheats,USA had good intensions from the start of Gulf War 1990-91 but countries like Saudia Arabia,UAE and other little kingdoms have thier own intersts,keep the rulers chairs safe and enjoy the oil revenues for them and thier families.Why these stupid Arab leaders not prefer to have full pledged democracy in thier own native lands?GCC countries are the most human right voilators still USA and EU countries are why supporting them.How many innocent American citizens lost their life for to protect stuppid leaders of saudia Arabia and others.Syria is a most dangerous country having always devils mind.Withdrawing at this stage,without US troops,raq will have sleepless nights ahead.

By: caitln

caitln — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:56:13 +0000

i am so proud of the soldiers that are over there fighting for us and i truly believe that we can win this battle

By: caitln

caitln — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:56:13 +0000

i am so proud of the soldiers that are over there fighting for us and i truly believe that we can win this battle

By: moondancer

moondancer — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:55:13 +0000

The bush attempt to sneak in an infinite defense accord is laughable. First the government of Iraq doesn't look like it will last very long. It would seem reasonable to call Iraq a failed state. Second the new president will feel no obligation to honor any accord on the books through subterfuge by the criminals of bushco without appropriate congressional approval. I think the only Iraqis that want the US military to stay is Maliki and his party. He views us as his militia.

By: taywray

taywray — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:09:28 +0000

The Skeletor administration is attempting to subvert one of the most basic legislative checks in our government. The Senate must ratify treaties between the U.S. and other states because of this exact situation: a lame duck, unpopular president attempting to commit his nation to an indefinite military occupation in the last months of his regime. If BushCo is able to make such an agreement with whatever Iraqi is in charge at the time without Senate approval, I think it will be safe to say American democracy is in serious peril.

By: moondancer

moondancer — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

The bush attempt to sneak in an infinite defense accord is laughable. First the government of Iraq doesn’t look like it will last very long. It would seem reasonable to call Iraq a failed state. Second the new president will feel no obligation to honor any accord on the books through subterfuge by the criminals of bushco without appropriate congressional approval. I think the only Iraqis that want the US military to stay is Maliki and his party. He views us as his militia.

By: taywray

taywray — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000