<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: Obama Reportedly Offers Clinton Secretary of State</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/18616/breaking-obama-reportedly-offers-clinton-secretary-of-state/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18616/breaking-obama-reportedly-offers-clinton-secretary-of-state</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaiianstyle</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18616/breaking-obama-reportedly-offers-clinton-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1#comment-37290</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaiianstyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18616#comment-37290</guid>
		<description>Clinton (s) and Napolitano in the Cabinet.  What a show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would prefer Bill Richardson, a proven, experienced and tried person.  He would and has been a team player.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Cabinet Officers are there to be the prime brain trust, trusted advisers, and leaders in carrying out his policy.  I think with Mrs. C there he would never know if he is getting political ambition/positioning, loyalty or is being double teamed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson would be loyal and competent.  Further I always deplore it when the trusted, qualified and  familiar person is passed over for some outsider.  It is always tempting to choose the devil you don&#039;t know over the one you do.  It is also most times destructive to your team&#039;s morale to know that working hard and being loyal does not qualify you for promotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton (s) and Napolitano in the Cabinet.  What a show.</p>
<p>I would prefer Bill Richardson, a proven, experienced and tried person.  He would and has been a team player.  </p>
<p>The Cabinet Officers are there to be the prime brain trust, trusted advisers, and leaders in carrying out his policy.  I think with Mrs. C there he would never know if he is getting political ambition/positioning, loyalty or is being double teamed.</p>
<p>Bill Richardson would be loyal and competent.  Further I always deplore it when the trusted, qualified and  familiar person is passed over for some outsider.  It is always tempting to choose the devil you don&#39;t know over the one you do.  It is also most times destructive to your team&#39;s morale to know that working hard and being loyal does not qualify you for promotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaiian style</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18616/breaking-obama-reportedly-offers-clinton-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1#comment-12163</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaiian style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18616#comment-12163</guid>
		<description>Clinton (s) and Napolitano in the Cabinet.  What a show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would prefer Bill Richardson, a proven, experienced and tried person.  He would and has been a team player.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Cabinet Officers are there to be the prime brain trust, trusted advisers, and leaders in carrying out his policy.  I think with Mrs. C there he would never know if he is getting political ambition/positioning, loyalty or is being double teamed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson would be loyal and competent.  Further I always deplore it when the trusted, qualified and  familiar person is passed over for some outsider.  It is always tempting to choose the devil you don&#039;t know over the one you do.  It is also most times destructive to your team&#039;s morale to know that working hard and being loyal does not qualify you for promotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton (s) and Napolitano in the Cabinet.  What a show.</p>
<p>I would prefer Bill Richardson, a proven, experienced and tried person.  He would and has been a team player.  </p>
<p>The Cabinet Officers are there to be the prime brain trust, trusted advisers, and leaders in carrying out his policy.  I think with Mrs. C there he would never know if he is getting political ambition/positioning, loyalty or is being double teamed.</p>
<p>Bill Richardson would be loyal and competent.  Further I always deplore it when the trusted, qualified and  familiar person is passed over for some outsider.  It is always tempting to choose the devil you don&#39;t know over the one you do.  It is also most times destructive to your team&#39;s morale to know that working hard and being loyal does not qualify you for promotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoveSong</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18616/breaking-obama-reportedly-offers-clinton-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1#comment-12145</link>
		<dc:creator>DoveSong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18616#comment-12145</guid>
		<description>I hope she is loyal... to our POTUS. Bill behave!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope she is loyal&#8230; to our POTUS. Bill behave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoveSong</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18616/breaking-obama-reportedly-offers-clinton-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1#comment-12144</link>
		<dc:creator>DoveSong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18616#comment-12144</guid>
		<description>Ok... Since Susan prefers to be more available for her children, it&#039;s OK. My first pick was Susan Rice, second  -Bill Richardson, third - Hill - but Iam concerned over Bill&#039;s dealings. He is terrible for our international affairs. He just wants to make money and stay famous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok&#8230; Since Susan prefers to be more available for her children, it&#39;s OK. My first pick was Susan Rice, second  -Bill Richardson, third &#8211; Hill &#8211; but Iam concerned over Bill&#39;s dealings. He is terrible for our international affairs. He just wants to make money and stay famous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

