<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Midnight De-Regulation Express</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:02:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-34563</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-34563</guid>
		<description>&quot;Right of a lady to go elsewhere for a procedure&quot; is a hollow argument throughout much of the country.  If you live in North Dakota, Arkansas, Idaho, or any of another dozen states, you likely don&#039;t have a Planned Parenthood or similar clinic that provides free/discounted contraception within miles, towns, or even between you and the next state.  Considering how funding has been pulled from clinics like Planned Parenthood under the last administration, there are even fewer branches of facilities able to keep their heads above water and provide patients with what the PATIENT wants.  People in this country forget that healthcare providers provide a service to consumers.  Their personal beliefs should not be able to overrule your needs as a patient.  You pay them for their medical expertise, not their opinions or leanings.  So &quot;going elsewhere&quot; is hard enough these days, and considering the budget woes facing the Obama administration, will likely not be a priority in the near future.  Contraception has gotten much harder to come by - federal funding is no longer provided for colleges to have it available to students at a discounted rate, for example.  I have no problem with doctors refusing to provide contraception IF they actually know another doctor they can refer the patient to who will.  Under this new rule, I fear the sense of obligation to assist the patient with what the PATIENT wants will continue to flicker out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Right of a lady to go elsewhere for a procedure&#8221; is a hollow argument throughout much of the country.  If you live in North Dakota, Arkansas, Idaho, or any of another dozen states, you likely don&#39;t have a Planned Parenthood or similar clinic that provides free/discounted contraception within miles, towns, or even between you and the next state.  Considering how funding has been pulled from clinics like Planned Parenthood under the last administration, there are even fewer branches of facilities able to keep their heads above water and provide patients with what the PATIENT wants.  People in this country forget that healthcare providers provide a service to consumers.  Their personal beliefs should not be able to overrule your needs as a patient.  You pay them for their medical expertise, not their opinions or leanings.  So &#8220;going elsewhere&#8221; is hard enough these days, and considering the budget woes facing the Obama administration, will likely not be a priority in the near future.  Contraception has gotten much harder to come by &#8211; federal funding is no longer provided for colleges to have it available to students at a discounted rate, for example.  I have no problem with doctors refusing to provide contraception IF they actually know another doctor they can refer the patient to who will.  Under this new rule, I fear the sense of obligation to assist the patient with what the PATIENT wants will continue to flicker out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-16272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-16272</guid>
		<description>&quot;Right of a lady to go elsewhere for a procedure&quot; is a hollow argument throughout much of the country.  If you live in North Dakota, Arkansas, Idaho, or any of another dozen states, you likely don&#039;t have a Planned Parenthood or similar clinic that provides free/discounted contraception within miles, towns, or even between you and the next state.  Considering how funding has been pulled from clinics like Planned Parenthood under the last administration, there are even fewer branches of facilities able to keep their heads above water and provide patients with what the PATIENT wants.  People in this country forget that healthcare providers provide a service to consumers.  Their personal beliefs should not be able to overrule your needs as a patient.  You pay them for their medical expertise, not their opinions or leanings.  So &quot;going elsewhere&quot; is hard enough these days, and considering the budget woes facing the Obama administration, will likely not be a priority in the near future.  Contraception has gotten much harder to come by - federal funding is no longer provided for colleges to have it available to students at a discounted rate, for example.  I have no problem with doctors refusing to provide contraception IF they actually know another doctor they can refer the patient to who will.  Under this new rule, I fear the sense of obligation to assist the patient with what the PATIENT wants will continue to flicker out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Right of a lady to go elsewhere for a procedure&#8221; is a hollow argument throughout much of the country.  If you live in North Dakota, Arkansas, Idaho, or any of another dozen states, you likely don&#39;t have a Planned Parenthood or similar clinic that provides free/discounted contraception within miles, towns, or even between you and the next state.  Considering how funding has been pulled from clinics like Planned Parenthood under the last administration, there are even fewer branches of facilities able to keep their heads above water and provide patients with what the PATIENT wants.  People in this country forget that healthcare providers provide a service to consumers.  Their personal beliefs should not be able to overrule your needs as a patient.  You pay them for their medical expertise, not their opinions or leanings.  So &#8220;going elsewhere&#8221; is hard enough these days, and considering the budget woes facing the Obama administration, will likely not be a priority in the near future.  Contraception has gotten much harder to come by &#8211; federal funding is no longer provided for colleges to have it available to students at a discounted rate, for example.  I have no problem with doctors refusing to provide contraception IF they actually know another doctor they can refer the patient to who will.  Under this new rule, I fear the sense of obligation to assist the patient with what the PATIENT wants will continue to flicker out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama orders Bush last minute rules frozen for administrative review</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-15988</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama orders Bush last minute rules frozen for administrative review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-15988</guid>
		<description>[...] a review by a brand brand new administration.  This pierce successfully blocks such last-minute controversial rules as a provider demur order as good as a pierce to concede visitors to inhabitant parks to lift [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a review by a brand brand new administration.  This pierce successfully blocks such last-minute controversial rules as a provider demur order as good as a pierce to concede visitors to inhabitant parks to lift [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama orders Bush last minute rules frozen for administrative review &#124; belowthewaist.org</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-15950</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama orders Bush last minute rules frozen for administrative review &#124; belowthewaist.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-15950</guid>
		<description>[...] frozen pending a review by the new administration.  This move successfully blocks such last-minute controversial rules as the provider conscience rule and a move to allow visitors to national parks to carry weapons. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] frozen pending a review by the new administration.  This move successfully blocks such last-minute controversial rules as the provider conscience rule and a move to allow visitors to national parks to carry weapons. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gochi</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-15752</link>
		<dc:creator>gochi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-15752</guid>
		<description>Excellent write up thanks for the information i love your writing skill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent write up thanks for the information i love your writing skill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaiian style</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-14594</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaiian style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-14594</guid>
		<description>Congress?  Hello.  Hello?  Is anyone home?  Is anyone listening?  Did you take an oath of office?  Are you really a co-equal branch of government?  You know...checks and balances?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its no wonder your approval rating is in a close race with Bush&#039;s toward zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress?  Hello.  Hello?  Is anyone home?  Is anyone listening?  Did you take an oath of office?  Are you really a co-equal branch of government?  You know&#8230;checks and balances?</p>
<p>Its no wonder your approval rating is in a close race with Bush&#39;s toward zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 DAPEOPbyDAPEOP</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-13570</link>
		<dc:creator>4 DAPEOPbyDAPEOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-13570</guid>
		<description>ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM           ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM         ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM     &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM            ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM           ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM           ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM         ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM     </p>
<p>ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM            ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM</p>
<p>ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM           ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM          ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 DAPEOPbyDAPEOP</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-13569</link>
		<dc:creator>4 DAPEOPbyDAPEOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-13569</guid>
		<description>Whats the difference - he&#039;s had an agenda since the moment he stepped into office.  We have been lied to - cheated out of freedoms and scared with the whole TERROR  TACTICS (alquada - osama - WMD&#039;S - OH MY!)- this admin has been nothing more than a FRONT for the true people who run this country - BIG BIZ - MILITARY - CIA - FBI - BANKS - PHAMICUTICAL.&lt;br&gt;we go on strike and protest in front of plants and factories when we want a raise but question your governments agenda and the blaent lies they tell us and what - your a TERRORIST - YOUR UNPATRIOTIC - YOUR A CONSPIRSY THERIST blah blah blah - &lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t have kids and i&#039;ll tell you why - who in their right mind would want to bring the most precious thing in the world into this hole.  What future are we leaving for the next generation or generations to come.&lt;br&gt;WAKE THE F#@% UP AMERICA - DO YOUR RESEARCH - IT IS OUR RIGHT TO QUESTION YOUR GOVERNMENT AND THEIR ACTIONS AND AGENDA!!!!!&lt;br&gt;our whole system is breaking down and all we can do is point the finger at each other - LOOK - QUESTION THINGS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats the difference &#8211; he&#39;s had an agenda since the moment he stepped into office.  We have been lied to &#8211; cheated out of freedoms and scared with the whole TERROR  TACTICS (alquada &#8211; osama &#8211; WMD&#39;S &#8211; OH MY!)- this admin has been nothing more than a FRONT for the true people who run this country &#8211; BIG BIZ &#8211; MILITARY &#8211; CIA &#8211; FBI &#8211; BANKS &#8211; PHAMICUTICAL.<br />we go on strike and protest in front of plants and factories when we want a raise but question your governments agenda and the blaent lies they tell us and what &#8211; your a TERRORIST &#8211; YOUR UNPATRIOTIC &#8211; YOUR A CONSPIRSY THERIST blah blah blah &#8211; <br />I don&#39;t have kids and i&#39;ll tell you why &#8211; who in their right mind would want to bring the most precious thing in the world into this hole.  What future are we leaving for the next generation or generations to come.<br />WAKE THE F#@% UP AMERICA &#8211; DO YOUR RESEARCH &#8211; IT IS OUR RIGHT TO QUESTION YOUR GOVERNMENT AND THEIR ACTIONS AND AGENDA!!!!!<br />our whole system is breaking down and all we can do is point the finger at each other &#8211; LOOK &#8211; QUESTION THINGS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachael</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-13149</link>
		<dc:creator>rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-13149</guid>
		<description>meeaaaow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meeaaaow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just-Say-NO</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17813/11-hour-regulations/comment-page-1#comment-12548</link>
		<dc:creator>Just-Say-NO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17813#comment-12548</guid>
		<description>Yes, a thoughtful article.  Re #3 on the list. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &quot;Working to protect the rights of some doctors who happen to not want to perform certain procedures&quot;?    Let&#039;s consider personal integrity for a moment.   If a particular procedure is morally repugnant  for a doctor, he/she is not FORCED to do it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it greed or fear of losing patients  that keeps a doctor from saying &quot;I don&#039;t perform &#039;ZZZ&#039;  procedure, let me refer you to someone who does,&quot;  or putting up a sign in his/her office stating the services he/she provides?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a thoughtful article.  Re #3 on the list. </p>
<p> &#8220;Working to protect the rights of some doctors who happen to not want to perform certain procedures&#8221;?    Let&#39;s consider personal integrity for a moment.   If a particular procedure is morally repugnant  for a doctor, he/she is not FORCED to do it.  </p>
<p>Is it greed or fear of losing patients  that keeps a doctor from saying &#8220;I don&#39;t perform &#39;ZZZ&#39;  procedure, let me refer you to someone who does,&#8221;  or putting up a sign in his/her office stating the services he/she provides?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
