Palin and Book Banning
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Yesterday, I blogged on Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s interview with The Anchorge Daily News, where she reflected on her time on the campaign trail.
There’s an exchange I didn’t mention then that I think is worth noting. Early on, Palin says she is frustrated that the media didn’t correct mistakes made about her record.
Q. There’s been an enormous amount of information about you that Alaskans have been exposed to the past couple of months — and lots of it very critical. What are Alaskans supposed to make of all this?
A. Regarding information regarding my record, that is now out there, much of it that was based on misinformation was a very, very frustrating thing to have to go through when the record was never corrected. And we would try to correct the record and too many in the media chose not to make those corrections.
What kind of corrections weren’t made?
I thought Palin might try to defend herself against stories that she had billed the state for her children’s travel. Or the story The Los Angeles Times broke about how she hired a lobbyist to get federal earmarks for Wasilla.
No.
It was the Harry Potter smear that went uncorrected!
Q. What misinformation are you talking about?
A. Some of the goofy things like who was Trig’s mom. Well, I’m Trig’s mom (raises her hand) and do you want to see my medical records to prove that? … And banning books. That was a ridiculous thing also that could have so easily been corrected just by a reporter taking an extra step and not basing a report on gossip or speculation. But just looking into the record. It was reported that I tried to ban Harry Potter when it hadn’t even been written when I was the mayor. So, gosh, we have so many examples, I mean every day, especially the first few weeks, every day something that was thrown out there.
The media reported that Palin had fired her local librarian after a discussion about book banning. I was the first reporter on the scene in the offices of the local paper, The Mat-Su Frontiersman, to check out the newspaper’s archives. Here on The Streak we were one of the first outlets to run a copy of the book-banning story.
The news was also included in the in-depth story that The New York Times ran on Palin’s time as mayor.
It was an anecdote that spread far and wide, but, as far as I know, no mainstream outlet accused Palin of successfully banning books, but just what had been reported at the time — that she broached the subject as mayor.
The accusation that Palin banned the Harry Potter series was part of an anonymous email making the rounds. I recall several people asking me if the email was real.
For Palin to say that the story was “reported” is a stretch. And it distracts from the story actually reported — that she did look into the possibility. This is an accusation she did not address directly.
Update: I’m surprised. The press actually did hit back against the Harry Potter ban claims. A story in USA Today points out the the email circulating was in fact a fake.
I should also note that I said Palin had not directly responded to questions about her inquiries into banning books. The story includes a comment from a Palin campaign spokesman:
“Sarah Palin has never asked anyone to ban a book,” Griffin said. “It shouldn’t be surprising that the new mayor of a city that had seen recent protests over books and was in the process of re-evaluating the book-challenge policies at its library would ask the librarian what those policies were.”
6 Comments
Comment posted November 11, 2008 @ 11:16 am
“This is an accusation she did not address directly.”
The question I have to ask is “was she pushed to answer that question directly?” Or did the interviewer not have the opportunity/wherewithall to ask a followup question?
Comment posted November 11, 2008 @ 12:50 pm
Wow. Armistice Day must be pretty dull in your part of the world.
Comment posted November 11, 2008 @ 7:16 pm
“This is an accusation she did not address directly.”
The question I have to ask is “was she pushed to answer that question directly?” Or did the interviewer not have the opportunity/wherewithall to ask a followup question?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss