Early Obama Initiative: the End of Guantanamo Bay

By
Monday, November 10, 2008 at 10:12 am

In July of 2005 I flew to Guantanamo Bay and spent four days on a Potemkin tour of one of the most disgraceful misadventures in U.S. history.

I saw bolts dug into the floor of interrogation chambers in Camp Five, from which detainees were restrained. I walked the blocks through the six-by-eight green-painted cells of Camps One and Two, and saw the small exercise courts where detainees of those camps enjoyed their daily hour out of those cages. I witnessed a non-judicial process called an Administrative Review Board where, with no true process, detainees contend annually that they’re not threats to the U.S., in which a tribunal of military officers  state that they expect detainees to pay for the provision of witnesses in their (quasi) defense. And I did this all with a group of right-wing radio hosts who brayed about orange chicken and weren’t we a great nation for treating these terrorists so well.

Less than a week after his election, and more than two months before he takes office, President-elect Barack Obama is signaling that this monstrosity is coming to an end. The Associated Press, via Time:

President-elect Obama’s advisers are quietly crafting a proposal to ship dozens, if not hundreds, of imprisoned terrorism suspects to the United States to face criminal trials, a plan that would make good on his promise to close the Guantanamo Bay prison but could require creation of a controversial new system of justice.

There are, of course, problems here. The AP’s reporting suggests Obama is considering a “hybrid process” between the military commissions and the full process enjoyed by U.S. citizens. If there’s anything the military commissions process should have taught, it’s that reinventing the legal system doesn’t work, as demonstrated by the bevy of military lawyers who have resigned in protest of the commissions.

The concern, stripped of euphemism, is that the evidentiary basis for many trials of Guantanamo detainees — including, in many cases, torture — would never be admissible in any court worthy of the name. That’s the Bush administration’s legacy. But it can’t be the basis for cheapening our legal system.

So we’ll wait to see what proposal finally emerges. But consider not only that this is one of the first initiatives that Obama is pursuing — it’s one of the first that he’s leaking, as well. This is as clear a signal as can be sent that the Bush era isn’t just over, it will be actively rolled back. How far it actually gets rolled back — we’ll just have to wait and see.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

8 Comments

PghMike
Comment posted November 10, 2008 @ 11:51 am

I think a key question is why we would need a hybrid court system, when the current court system is alread able to handle cases such as those where an intelligence agency is infiltrated by a spy, where a great deal of secret evidence is presented.


justice
Comment posted November 10, 2008 @ 12:14 pm

You make an excellent point for our troops executing justice in the field rather than letting lawyers into the process.


nutrition foods
Comment posted January 29, 2009 @ 3:10 pm

Thanks for the info. May God have mercy on us all.


for you health
Comment posted January 30, 2009 @ 9:54 pm

nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-)
keep it up


Cara B Levi
Comment posted February 9, 2009 @ 4:42 pm

great article!, grats for u site :)


Angela Poole
Comment posted February 16, 2009 @ 5:02 pm

373387


sasmoo
Comment posted March 30, 2009 @ 10:46 am

How do you suppose we get information from the terrorists then? Simply ask politely? Fuck no. From information you have provided, there is no actual evidence proving we actually torture these terrorists. The only actual “torture technique” I have heard about is washboarding, which is where the detainee lies flat on his back and they pour water over him/her to create the illusion they are drowning. Although that definitely is not comfortable, it is in no way inhumane. Plus, if we bring the detainees into America, that gives them the privilege of living here (even though it would be in jail) No one wants to live by a terrorist. Lastly, who do you think will have to pay for the moving, putting them on trial and jailing them? WE will. The tax payers have already suffered enough as it is and will have to endure far worse in the future, due to Obama's “help”. I just ask you to think before you speak.


sasmoo
Comment posted March 30, 2009 @ 5:46 pm

How do you suppose we get information from the terrorists then? Simply ask politely? Fuck no. From information you have provided, there is no actual evidence proving we actually torture these terrorists. The only actual “torture technique” I have heard about is washboarding, which is where the detainee lies flat on his back and they pour water over him/her to create the illusion they are drowning. Although that definitely is not comfortable, it is in no way inhumane. Plus, if we bring the detainees into America, that gives them the privilege of living here (even though it would be in jail) No one wants to live by a terrorist. Lastly, who do you think will have to pay for the moving, putting them on trial and jailing them? WE will. The tax payers have already suffered enough as it is and will have to endure far worse in the future, due to Obama's “help”. I just ask you to think before you speak.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.