Comments on: Screaming at the TV

By: mclaren

mclaren — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:01:28 +0000

I'd say it makes it worse. He wanted to do more, and those who think like he does finished the job for him.

As for the debate, neo-liberals don't like it when the media treat Dems as if they were Republicans, do you? That's why Dems are surprised and angry when they get normal questions, and Repubs fully expect below-the-belt crap all the time. When you are treated like a little baby by the media for so long, and then you suddenly get an upper-cut, the Dems don't know how to deal with it. This is hilarious to conservatives.

By: madisonaubie

madisonaubie — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:10:47 +0000

The article to which you refer was PRINTED on 9/11. It went to post on 9/10, BEFORE the events of 9/11. The timing was merely coincidental and his comments had nothing to do with 9/11 but was about a book he'd written years earlier about his days with the Weather Men. Nice try though!!

By: lonewackodotcom

lonewackodotcom — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:37:21 +0000

To be intellectually honest, you might want to add that WilliamAyers' relationship with Obama is of more recent vintage, and that the former wrote an interesting NYT editorial in 2001, 9/11 of that year to be precise.

By: mclaren

mclaren — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

I’d say it makes it worse. He wanted to do more, and those who think like he does finished the job for him.

As for the debate, neo-liberals don’t like it when the media treat Dems as if they were Republicans, do you? That’s why Dems are surprised and angry when they get normal questions, and Repubs fully expect below-the-belt crap all the time. When you are treated like a little baby by the media for so long, and then you suddenly get an upper-cut, the Dems don’t know how to deal with it. This is hilarious to conservatives.

By: madisonaubie

madisonaubie — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

The article to which you refer was PRINTED on 9/11. It went to post on 9/10, BEFORE the events of 9/11. The timing was merely coincidental and his comments had nothing to do with 9/11 but was about a book he’d written years earlier about his days with the Weather Men. Nice try though!!

By: lonewackodotcom

lonewackodotcom — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

To be intellectually honest, you might want to add that WilliamAyers’ relationship with Obama is of more recent vintage, and that the former wrote an interesting NYT editorial in 2001, 9/11 of that year to be precise.