<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Liberal Narrative on Iraq Might Not Be Going Official Yet!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/1621/the-liberal-narrative-on-iraq-might-not-be-going-official-yet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1621/the-liberal-narrative-on-iraq-might-not-be-going-official-yet</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: callmeethel</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1621/the-liberal-narrative-on-iraq-might-not-be-going-official-yet/comment-page-1#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>callmeethel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1621#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>re: lib narrative on iraq, and ackerman&#039;s signing of the open letter in response to the last dem debate.



Who isn&#039;t glad that the moderators didn&#039;t ask the anti-war Obama why he&#039;s more anxious to serve Nancy &#039;impeachment is off the table&#039; Pelosi than he--a would-be Commander in Chief, remember--is anxious to serve the troops (and their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness)?



The secret to John McCain&#039;s successful candidacy (whether or not he wins) is that if the anti-war Barack Obama had ever been Commander in Chief material, nobody could&#039;ve stopped Obama from ending the war or from dying trying.



Suppose the moderators of the debate had asked war voter Hillary Clinton whether she believes she&#039;s able to impeach Bush without presenting evidence that would demand her own impeachment, and whether a &quot;No&quot; anser would mean that Clinton&#039;s NY constituents--the ones who&#039;d end the war by impeaching Bush--are without representation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: lib narrative on iraq, and ackerman&#8217;s signing of the open letter in response to the last dem debate.</p>
<p>Who isn&#8217;t glad that the moderators didn&#8217;t ask the anti-war Obama why he&#8217;s more anxious to serve Nancy &#8216;impeachment is off the table&#8217; Pelosi than he&#8211;a would-be Commander in Chief, remember&#8211;is anxious to serve the troops (and their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness)?</p>
<p>The secret to John McCain&#8217;s successful candidacy (whether or not he wins) is that if the anti-war Barack Obama had ever been Commander in Chief material, nobody could&#8217;ve stopped Obama from ending the war or from dying trying.</p>
<p>Suppose the moderators of the debate had asked war voter Hillary Clinton whether she believes she&#8217;s able to impeach Bush without presenting evidence that would demand her own impeachment, and whether a &quot;No&quot; anser would mean that Clinton&#8217;s NY constituents&#8211;the ones who&#8217;d end the war by impeaching Bush&#8211;are without representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbarrows103</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1621/the-liberal-narrative-on-iraq-might-not-be-going-official-yet/comment-page-1#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>gbarrows103</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1621#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>good post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spencer_ackerman</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1621/the-liberal-narrative-on-iraq-might-not-be-going-official-yet/comment-page-1#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>spencer_ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1621#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>If I was trying to conceal something, why would I link to the SWJ post? You need to take a deep breath and think things through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was trying to conceal something, why would I link to the SWJ post? You need to take a deep breath and think things through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjayinc</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1621/the-liberal-narrative-on-iraq-might-not-be-going-official-yet/comment-page-1#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>emjayinc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1621#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>Appears your whole take needs, oh horrors, revision: use of NDU, liberal narrative, linking various names and themes known to draw a knee jerk reaction in some quarters, and so on. Starts with the subject itself - despite your repetition, Collins&#039; work was/is not an NDU study on Iraq. Or maybe you should assign B3 to those 2 (of 5?) prescient McClatchy &quot;reporters&quot;. Or just check your sources through SWJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appears your whole take needs, oh horrors, revision: use of NDU, liberal narrative, linking various names and themes known to draw a knee jerk reaction in some quarters, and so on. Starts with the subject itself &#8211; despite your repetition, Collins&#8217; work was/is not an NDU study on Iraq. Or maybe you should assign B3 to those 2 (of 5?) prescient McClatchy &quot;reporters&quot;. Or just check your sources through SWJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

