Waxman to Greenspan: Were You Wrong?

Greenspan thought deregulation would bring a self governess in the banking system. These greedy CEO’s were supposed to police each other, not con each other. Deregulation bought out the worst of Wall Street, and America was pillaged. This greed and neglect of self governess have bought on the worst financial storm that the world has ever faced. Once the dust settles, America should band together and bring on a class action suit against the actions of these CEO’s. According to Greenspan, “believed lending institutions would do a good job of protecting their shareholders” instead, they profited, jump ship and left the American tax payers holding the bag (i.e. http://www.BuyMyHouseBeforeTheBankTakesIt.com).

So “Liberal” essentially assumes that “We The People” are self-disciplined enough to not need a micromanaging authoritarian government to interfere in our personal decisions. Conservatives think “Liberal” is evil and can't work.

Likewise, “Neoliberal” essentially assumes that Big Business is restrained enough to not need an authoritarian regulatory government. Conservatives think “Neoliberal” is good and are willing to gamble the health of the nation on it.

Why is it that the inherent evil in humans is suddenly ignored when the pretend Big Business is a person? It don't add up.

Who do they think they are fooling? This was all by design.

Watch this video:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319…

WHy don't you link an article to the huffington post for justification also. Fannie and Freddie were deeply at the root of the financial problems. Things like Credit Default Swaps just made the problem bigger than it should have been. If private banks did not adhere to CRA rules they would be penalized. How about you insert some VERY pertinent facts into your analysis.

What Greenspan is saying is that the banks have backed themselves into a corner with derivatives and the population has been stripped of its wealth. Even though he knows this, he can't allow his train of thought to take the next logical step, which is, instead of giving the banks more money, give the money back to the population.

http://ewebsmith.com/Finance/therealproblem.html
http://ewebsmith.com/bus/taxpayers.html

You sound pretty far gone. I don't know if you can be helped. In a nutshell, nearly everything governments does, it does very poorly. The less government the better. Sure we need some, for our military, roads ect. but for the most part the less, the better!

You sound pretty far gone. I don't know if you can be helped. In a nutshell, nearly everything governments does, it does very poorly. The less government the better. Sure we need some, for our military, roads ect. but for the most part the less, the better!

DO you like it?

Thank you for your sharing.I'm very interested in it.

so cool!

Demonstrate a unique new concept;Thereforejordan shoes|michael jordan shoes|cheap jordan shoesboth dressed in fashionable taste therelinks of london|air jordan 23|air jordan 11|air jordan 13So,air jordan 12this is the dress of a good choice!air jordan 21|air jordan 14|air jordan 16|At the same time,also has a super-powerful visual force;air jordan 17|air jordan 19|air jordan 18|This is a pretty good article!

[...] Wednesday’s hearing on credit rating agencies, Mica and other Republican committee members held up a sign reading “Nov. 20″ — a reference to the date of a hearing devoted to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Mica has even [...]

Property Solicitor…

[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]…

[...] Wednesday’s hearing on credit rating agencies, Mica and other Republican committee members held up a sign reading “Nov. 20″ — a reference to the date of a hearing devoted to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Mica has even [...]