<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mending Mental Health Coverage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/1436/mending-mental-health-coverage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1436/mending-mental-health-coverage</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parityfanatic</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1436/mending-mental-health-coverage/comment-page-1#comment-37023</link>
		<dc:creator>Parityfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1436#comment-37023</guid>
		<description>October 3, 2008 a day that will be remembered. The US. House of Representatives has  passed the $700 BILLION Bailout bill (I mean &quot;Economic Recovery&quot; Bill) The &quot;revised&quot; Bill includes the Mental Health Insurance parity legislation. It is hard to believe it took a &quot;Nuclear&quot; Economic Meltdown to get this legislation passed. The President signed this Bill into law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since 2001, ALL federal employees &amp; their dependents (8.5 Million+ ) have had FULL mental health insurance parity in their group health insurance plan (FEBHP) due to the executive order of President William Clinton. The cost has been minimal &amp; insurance carriers have had NO problem determining when mental illness care was medically necessary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For many years, &quot;special interests&quot; have been successful in keeping private sector insureds from having this meaningful coverage.&lt;br&gt;The NEW legislation states that &quot;mental health benefits&quot; mean benefits with respect to services for mental health conditions, as defined under the terms of the plan and in accordance with applicable Federal and State law. In other words, NO DSM IV definitions of mental illness, each PLAN will decide what Mental illness the plan will cover.&lt;br&gt;Whatever &quot;Mental Illness&quot; is covered would need to be covered in the same manner as regular illness, like Heart problems. In reality, this plan provides parity insurance coverage for &quot;the chosen&quot; mental problems designated.&lt;br&gt;This legislation is certainly BETTER than any prior federal legislation on the subject. &lt;br&gt;The legislation requires the GAO to prepare periodic studies which must include an analysis of which diagnoses are most commonly covered or excluded. &lt;br&gt;This legislation does NOT provide coverage on par with the Federal Employees Group Health program.&lt;br&gt;It certainly is a step forward for private sector Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October 3, 2008 a day that will be remembered. The US. House of Representatives has  passed the $700 BILLION Bailout bill (I mean &#8220;Economic Recovery&#8221; Bill) The &#8220;revised&#8221; Bill includes the Mental Health Insurance parity legislation. It is hard to believe it took a &#8220;Nuclear&#8221; Economic Meltdown to get this legislation passed. The President signed this Bill into law.</p>
<p>Since 2001, ALL federal employees &#038; their dependents (8.5 Million+ ) have had FULL mental health insurance parity in their group health insurance plan (FEBHP) due to the executive order of President William Clinton. The cost has been minimal &#038; insurance carriers have had NO problem determining when mental illness care was medically necessary.</p>
<p>For many years, &#8220;special interests&#8221; have been successful in keeping private sector insureds from having this meaningful coverage.<br />The NEW legislation states that &#8220;mental health benefits&#8221; mean benefits with respect to services for mental health conditions, as defined under the terms of the plan and in accordance with applicable Federal and State law. In other words, NO DSM IV definitions of mental illness, each PLAN will decide what Mental illness the plan will cover.<br />Whatever &#8220;Mental Illness&#8221; is covered would need to be covered in the same manner as regular illness, like Heart problems. In reality, this plan provides parity insurance coverage for &#8220;the chosen&#8221; mental problems designated.<br />This legislation is certainly BETTER than any prior federal legislation on the subject. <br />The legislation requires the GAO to prepare periodic studies which must include an analysis of which diagnoses are most commonly covered or excluded. <br />This legislation does NOT provide coverage on par with the Federal Employees Group Health program.<br />It certainly is a step forward for private sector Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parityfanatic</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1436/mending-mental-health-coverage/comment-page-1#comment-8862</link>
		<dc:creator>Parityfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1436#comment-8862</guid>
		<description>October 3, 2008 a day that will be remembered. The US. House of Representatives has  passed the $700 BILLION Bailout bill (I mean &quot;Economic Recovery&quot; Bill) The &quot;revised&quot; Bill includes the Mental Health Insurance parity legislation. It is hard to believe it took a &quot;Nuclear&quot; Economic Meltdown to get this legislation passed. The President signed this Bill into law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since 2001, ALL federal employees &amp; their dependents (8.5 Million+ ) have had FULL mental health insurance parity in their group health insurance plan (FEBHP) due to the executive order of President William Clinton. The cost has been minimal &amp; insurance carriers have had NO problem determining when mental illness care was medically necessary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For many years, &quot;special interests&quot; have been successful in keeping private sector insureds from having this meaningful coverage.&lt;br&gt;The NEW legislation states that &quot;mental health benefits&quot; mean benefits with respect to services for mental health conditions, as defined under the terms of the plan and in accordance with applicable Federal and State law. In other words, NO DSM IV definitions of mental illness, each PLAN will decide what Mental illness the plan will cover.&lt;br&gt;Whatever &quot;Mental Illness&quot; is covered would need to be covered in the same manner as regular illness, like Heart problems. In reality, this plan provides parity insurance coverage for &quot;the chosen&quot; mental problems designated.&lt;br&gt;This legislation is certainly BETTER than any prior federal legislation on the subject. &lt;br&gt;The legislation requires the GAO to prepare periodic studies which must include an analysis of which diagnoses are most commonly covered or excluded. &lt;br&gt;This legislation does NOT provide coverage on par with the Federal Employees Group Health program.&lt;br&gt;It certainly is a step forward for private sector Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October 3, 2008 a day that will be remembered. The US. House of Representatives has  passed the $700 BILLION Bailout bill (I mean &#8220;Economic Recovery&#8221; Bill) The &#8220;revised&#8221; Bill includes the Mental Health Insurance parity legislation. It is hard to believe it took a &#8220;Nuclear&#8221; Economic Meltdown to get this legislation passed. The President signed this Bill into law.</p>
<p>Since 2001, ALL federal employees &#038; their dependents (8.5 Million+ ) have had FULL mental health insurance parity in their group health insurance plan (FEBHP) due to the executive order of President William Clinton. The cost has been minimal &#038; insurance carriers have had NO problem determining when mental illness care was medically necessary.</p>
<p>For many years, &#8220;special interests&#8221; have been successful in keeping private sector insureds from having this meaningful coverage.<br />The NEW legislation states that &#8220;mental health benefits&#8221; mean benefits with respect to services for mental health conditions, as defined under the terms of the plan and in accordance with applicable Federal and State law. In other words, NO DSM IV definitions of mental illness, each PLAN will decide what Mental illness the plan will cover.<br />Whatever &#8220;Mental Illness&#8221; is covered would need to be covered in the same manner as regular illness, like Heart problems. In reality, this plan provides parity insurance coverage for &#8220;the chosen&#8221; mental problems designated.<br />This legislation is certainly BETTER than any prior federal legislation on the subject. <br />The legislation requires the GAO to prepare periodic studies which must include an analysis of which diagnoses are most commonly covered or excluded. <br />This legislation does NOT provide coverage on par with the Federal Employees Group Health program.<br />It certainly is a step forward for private sector Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clark</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1436/mending-mental-health-coverage/comment-page-1#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1436#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>I think it is overtime for a real equality bill to become law. Just give US the same treatment the Federal staff has nomothetic.



________________________

clark

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addictionrecovery.net/washington&quot;&gt;Addiction Recovery Washington&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is overtime for a real equality bill to become law. Just give US the same treatment the Federal staff has nomothetic.</p>
<p>________________________</p>
<p>clark</p>
<p><a href="http://www.addictionrecovery.net/washington">Addiction Recovery Washington</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parityfanatic</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1436/mending-mental-health-coverage/comment-page-1#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>parityfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1436#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>This discussion of mental health insurance parity misses an important point. Since 2001 All federal employees &amp; their dependents (8.5 million + individuals) have had full mental health insurance parity in their group health insurance program. Mental illness as defined by the DSM has been the vehicle to define mental illness. The cost for this parity has proven minimal &amp; insurance carriers have had no difficulty determining when mental illness coverage is necessary.

The House legislation is more in line with the Federal employees coverage.

I find it outrageous that our Representatives HAVE this coverage &amp; we, private sector turkeys are denied this coverage.

Are we really seeing the power of special interest money over the needs of ordinary voting citizens ?

Its overtime for a real parity bill to become law. Just give US the same coverage the Federal employees have no more, no less.

Let us eliminate the BS being circulated &amp; deal with the issue.

I have not failed to notice none of the doomsayers mention the Federal employee parity success.

I get tired of the SAME bull. Knock it off &amp; stop the con job !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discussion of mental health insurance parity misses an important point. Since 2001 All federal employees &#038; their dependents (8.5 million + individuals) have had full mental health insurance parity in their group health insurance program. Mental illness as defined by the DSM has been the vehicle to define mental illness. The cost for this parity has proven minimal &#038; insurance carriers have had no difficulty determining when mental illness coverage is necessary.</p>
<p>The House legislation is more in line with the Federal employees coverage.</p>
<p>I find it outrageous that our Representatives HAVE this coverage &#038; we, private sector turkeys are denied this coverage.</p>
<p>Are we really seeing the power of special interest money over the needs of ordinary voting citizens ?</p>
<p>Its overtime for a real parity bill to become law. Just give US the same coverage the Federal employees have no more, no less.</p>
<p>Let us eliminate the BS being circulated &#038; deal with the issue.</p>
<p>I have not failed to notice none of the doomsayers mention the Federal employee parity success.</p>
<p>I get tired of the SAME bull. Knock it off &#038; stop the con job !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

