<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 200,000 Letters In 32 Hours?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:28:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cheap Shopping Online</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours/comment-page-1#comment-86768</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Shopping Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=14201#comment-86768</guid>
		<description>Thanks for info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwilker</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours/comment-page-1#comment-35656</link>
		<dc:creator>iwilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=14201#comment-35656</guid>
		<description>Interesting insight from Andrew Wetzler, a lawyer and ESA expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, on his &lt;a href=&quot;http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/whats_your_opinion_worth_maybe.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having the Department of Interior, rather than the Fish and Wildlife Service, respond to the comments is consistent with some informal conversations I’ve had with Agency personnel, who told me that the scientists and policy experts at the Fish and Wildlife Service were not consulted on these proposed rule changes and would not be taking any role in analyzing them.  Reading between the lines a bit, it sounded to me that the  Service’s career employees were none to happy about the proposal or the Administration’s failure to run it through normal channels.  Put another way, these rule changes are almost entirely the product of political appointees at the Department of the Interior and it looks like the Bush Administration is determined to keep it that way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wetzler&#039;s been &lt;a href=&quot;http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/tags/showtag.php?tag=endangeredspeciesact&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a really good source&lt;/a&gt; on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting insight from Andrew Wetzler, a lawyer and ESA expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, on his <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/whats_your_opinion_worth_maybe.html" rel="nofollow">blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Having the Department of Interior, rather than the Fish and Wildlife Service, respond to the comments is consistent with some informal conversations I’ve had with Agency personnel, who told me that the scientists and policy experts at the Fish and Wildlife Service were not consulted on these proposed rule changes and would not be taking any role in analyzing them.  Reading between the lines a bit, it sounded to me that the  Service’s career employees were none to happy about the proposal or the Administration’s failure to run it through normal channels.  Put another way, these rule changes are almost entirely the product of political appointees at the Department of the Interior and it looks like the Bush Administration is determined to keep it that way.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wetzler&#39;s been <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/tags/showtag.php?tag=endangeredspeciesact" rel="nofollow">a really good source</a> on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwilker</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours/comment-page-1#comment-9948</link>
		<dc:creator>iwilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=14201#comment-9948</guid>
		<description>Interesting insight from Andrew Wetzler, a lawyer and ESA expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, on his &lt;a href=&quot;http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/whats_your_opinion_worth_maybe.html&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having the Department of Interior, rather than the Fish and Wildlife Service, respond to the comments is consistent with some informal conversations I’ve had with Agency personnel, who told me that the scientists and policy experts at the Fish and Wildlife Service were not consulted on these proposed rule changes and would not be taking any role in analyzing them.  Reading between the lines a bit, it sounded to me that the  Service’s career employees were none to happy about the proposal or the Administration’s failure to run it through normal channels.  Put another way, these rule changes are almost entirely the product of political appointees at the Department of the Interior and it looks like the Bush Administration is determined to keep it that way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wetzler&#039;s been &lt;a href=&quot;http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/tags/showtag.php?tag=endangeredspeciesact&quot;&gt;a really good source&lt;/a&gt; on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting insight from Andrew Wetzler, a lawyer and ESA expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, on his <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/whats_your_opinion_worth_maybe.html">blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Having the Department of Interior, rather than the Fish and Wildlife Service, respond to the comments is consistent with some informal conversations I’ve had with Agency personnel, who told me that the scientists and policy experts at the Fish and Wildlife Service were not consulted on these proposed rule changes and would not be taking any role in analyzing them.  Reading between the lines a bit, it sounded to me that the  Service’s career employees were none to happy about the proposal or the Administration’s failure to run it through normal channels.  Put another way, these rule changes are almost entirely the product of political appointees at the Department of the Interior and it looks like the Bush Administration is determined to keep it that way.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wetzler&#39;s been <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/tags/showtag.php?tag=endangeredspeciesact">a really good source</a> on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours/comment-page-1#comment-9568</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=14201#comment-9568</guid>
		<description>One more item to add to the recap: On Sept. 24th, Assistant Secretary of Interior Lyle Laverty was scheduled to appear before the Senate Environment and Public Works committee to discuss the proposal, but he bailed out at the last minute.  He told the committee he couldn&#039;t get his testimony approved by higher ups, though an Interior spokesperson said he canceled at the request of the ranking minority member, who led a republican boycott of the hearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more item to add to the recap: On Sept. 24th, Assistant Secretary of Interior Lyle Laverty was scheduled to appear before the Senate Environment and Public Works committee to discuss the proposal, but he bailed out at the last minute.  He told the committee he couldn&#39;t get his testimony approved by higher ups, though an Interior spokesperson said he canceled at the request of the ranking minority member, who led a republican boycott of the hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
