Comments on: Clinton Loans Campaign $6.4 Million http://washingtonindependent.com/1418/clinton-loans-campaign-64-million National News in Context Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:10:47 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: mattklink http://washingtonindependent.com/1418/clinton-loans-campaign-64-million/comment-page-1#comment-4141 mattklink Wed, 07 May 2008 13:18:05 +0000 http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1418#comment-4141 It's never a good sign when, because of necessity, a candidate is forced to put his or her own money into a political campaign...that is, unless the candidate is so rich that he/she is funding the entire election effort out from a personal fortune. That's not the case for Hillary.<br><br>Given Obama's strong showing last evening in North Carolina and his near victory in Indiana, expect that his money-raising juggernaut will continue. Mrs. Clinton will grow ever-more cash strapped and, ultimately, her campaign will be forced to reach the decision as to when to throw in the towel. Note that it's no longer an "if" question, but a "when" question. It's never a good sign when, because of necessity, a candidate is forced to put his or her own money into a political campaign…that is, unless the candidate is so rich that he/she is funding the entire election effort out from a personal fortune. That's not the case for Hillary.

Given Obama's strong showing last evening in North Carolina and his near victory in Indiana, expect that his money-raising juggernaut will continue. Mrs. Clinton will grow ever-more cash strapped and, ultimately, her campaign will be forced to reach the decision as to when to throw in the towel. Note that it's no longer an “if” question, but a “when” question.

]]> By: mattklink http://washingtonindependent.com/1418/clinton-loans-campaign-64-million/comment-page-1#comment-1195 mattklink Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1418#comment-1195 It's never a good sign when, because of necessity, a candidate is forced to put his or her own money into a political campaign...that is, unless the candidate is so rich that he/she is funding the entire election effort out from a personal fortune. That's not the case for Hillary. Given Obama's strong showing last evening in North Carolina and his near victory in Indiana, expect that his money-raising juggernaut will continue. Mrs. Clinton will grow ever-more cash strapped and, ultimately, her campaign will be forced to reach the decision as to when to throw in the towel. Note that it's no longer an "if" question, but a "when" question. It’s never a good sign when, because of necessity, a candidate is forced to put his or her own money into a political campaign…that is, unless the candidate is so rich that he/she is funding the entire election effort out from a personal fortune. That’s not the case for Hillary.

Given Obama’s strong showing last evening in North Carolina and his near victory in Indiana, expect that his money-raising juggernaut will continue. Mrs. Clinton will grow ever-more cash strapped and, ultimately, her campaign will be forced to reach the decision as to when to throw in the towel. Note that it’s no longer an “if” question, but a “when” question.

]]>