<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sources Holler Back: Petraeus Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/1406/sources-holler-back-petraeus-edition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1406/sources-holler-back-petraeus-edition</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:28:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: strangely_enough</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1406/sources-holler-back-petraeus-edition/comment-page-1#comment-2882</link>
		<dc:creator>strangely_enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1406#comment-2882</guid>
		<description>What do the &quot;late &#039;70&#039;s&quot; and &quot;1999-2000&quot; have in common? That&#039;s right: Democratic administrations, which apparently invite and allow criticism of the military (particularly procurement and readiness), which are immediately forgotten as soon as a Republican is voted into the White House, especially if that Republican decides to start making shows of  American military power abroad, i.e. the &#039;80&#039;s and the present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the &#8220;late &#39;70&#39;s&#8221; and &#8220;1999-2000&#8243; have in common? That&#39;s right: Democratic administrations, which apparently invite and allow criticism of the military (particularly procurement and readiness), which are immediately forgotten as soon as a Republican is voted into the White House, especially if that Republican decides to start making shows of  American military power abroad, i.e. the &#39;80&#39;s and the present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangely_enough</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1406/sources-holler-back-petraeus-edition/comment-page-1#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>strangely_enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=1406#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>What do the &quot;late &#039;70&#039;s&quot; and &quot;1999-2000&quot; have in common? That&#039;s right: Democratic administrations, which apparently invite and allow criticism of the military (particularly procurement and readiness), which are immediately forgotten as soon as a Republican is voted into the White House, especially if that Republican decides to start making shows of  American military power abroad, i.e. the &#039;80&#039;s and the present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the &#8220;late &#8217;70&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;1999-2000&#8243; have in common? That&#8217;s right: Democratic administrations, which apparently invite and allow criticism of the military (particularly procurement and readiness), which are immediately forgotten as soon as a Republican is voted into the White House, especially if that Republican decides to start making shows of  American military power abroad, i.e. the &#8217;80&#8217;s and the present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
