Rice on Obama Diplomacy

By
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 11:05 am

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke out Monday on Sen. Barack Obama’s diplomatic approach to hostile countries, during an exchange with Lukman Ahmed of BBC Arabic Television.

Rice stressed that the Bush administration’s tough stand on Iran was backed by multilateral agreements and prior U.N. resolutions, while sounding a positive note on high-level meetings. Once Iran suspends its enrichment program, she said “we’re prepared to talk to Iran at anytime.”

Transcript from the State Dept.:

QUESTION: Let’s move to Iran. The Democratic candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, mentioned his willingness to talk to Iran if it’s going to produce any result. Why your position was the opposite? Was your policy toward Iran based on ideological stand or political strategy, and can you explain?

RICE: Well, let’s remember that the policy toward Iran is a policy not just of the United States but also of the European 3 – Germany, Britain and France – and Russia and China, which is to say that there are two tracks. If Iran is willing to negotiate and to suspend its enrichment and reprocessing, and accept the very generous offer that the six have put on the table, including, by the way, an offer for civil nuclear power, then there’s an open path to not just negotiation about the nuclear program but negotiation about anything that Iran wishes to talk about.

I hardly think that that’s saying that we won’t talk to Iran. We’re perfectly ready to talk to Iran. But what we don’t want to do is to give Iran cover to continue improving its nuclear programs that could lead to a nuclear weapon, which, by the way, no one in the international community wants to see Iran with a nuclear weapon. So my question has always been not why won’t the United States talk to Tehran, why won’t Tehran talk to the United States.

QUESTION: But you haven’t had a visit at a higher level, you know, in talking with Iran till now, only with strong conditions.

RICE: Well, those conditions are set by four Security Council resolutions, not just by the United States. But we’re prepared to talk to Iran at anytime. But suspend the program, even for a while, and demonstrate that there is not a desire to have a nuclear weapon.

It’s no Powell endorsement, but Rice is saying that greater engagement with Iran is a fine objective, suggesting that Obama might be on to something, while still disagreeing on the preconditions required for high-level meetings.

Comments

5 Comments

section9
Comment posted October 21, 2008 @ 9:26 am

Actually, it's Obama that's been pulled in her direction, not the other way 'round.

The Iranians are proceeding pell mell towards the Atomic Bomb in a bid to dominate the Middle East. Obama's initial stance: unconditional talks, was childishly naive. Now, having been slapped around by adults like Zbig, he moves toward Rice's rather reasonable position of getting the Iranians back into the NPT regime and getting the Middle East away from the atomic arms race that would most suredly follow.


Bob
Comment posted October 21, 2008 @ 4:40 pm

Rice is a McCain Supporter. Don't get your hopes up. And As far as Powell, he only endorsed Obama holding a grudge against Bush.


Hawaiian style
Comment posted December 9, 2008 @ 11:57 am

Madam Secretary,

You have endorsed torture, war with Iraq and who knows what else.

Why should I believe you when you now want to spin the Bush Doctrine of we don't talk to our enemies?

Other than being deliriously happy when you “end justifies the means” crowd are replaced I'm afraid I will be addicted to my anger and have no one to lay it on.


Hawaiianstyle
Comment posted December 9, 2008 @ 7:57 pm

Madam Secretary,

You have endorsed torture, war with Iraq and who knows what else.

Why should I believe you when you now want to spin the Bush Doctrine of we don't talk to our enemies?

Other than being deliriously happy when you “end justifies the means” crowd are replaced I'm afraid I will be addicted to my anger and have no one to lay it on.


Websites tagged "agreements" on Postsaver
Pingback posted December 25, 2008 @ 6:17 am

[...] by frankybody2008-12-13 – Switzerland set to meet CO2 Kyoto objectives saved by TZD2008-12-11 – Rice on Obama Diplomacy saved by freehat7042008-12-09 – Confidentiality Agreements – Term saved by motorpsycle2008-12-06 – [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.