Report: Federal Agencies of Two Minds on Freedom of Speech
Friday, October 17, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Federal agencies have inconsistent media policies when it comes to allowing scientists to share information with journalists, concludes a new study by the Union of Concerned Scientists.
The nonpartisan, nonprofit group issued a “report card” grading 15 federal agencies on their communication policies. Some agencies, it found, “stifle communication” even if their policies encourage free speech. Other agencies simply have weak policies regarding communication with the media.
The Centers for Disease Control, for example, was found to have the best media policy, one that allows scientists to state personal views and review press releases about their own research. But the agency poorly implemented the policy.
According to the study released today, the agencies with the best communication policies, and which most effectively implemented them, were NASA, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA). The Union of Concerned Scientists has commended NASA for improving its media policy after a political appointee in the agency reportedly censored leading climate scientist James Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
The agencies with the worst policies include the Environmental Protection Agency, the Fish and Wildlife Service (within the Dept. of Interior), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
The report card is below. The full report can be found here (pdf).

2 Comments
Comment posted October 28, 2008 @ 5:27 pm
You all should know that constitutional protection is afforded all citizens against federal agencies. Unless the information is marked TOP SECRET, all employees have a right to speak. To deprive any American from speaking using a threat of job loss by an agency is a violation of the RICO laws. No agency shall be in aide of rackettering under 18 US 1955, ALL . Also if any citizen has knowledge of an on going crime, you may prosecute under Civil Rico General Order 34. Isn't it enough that the voting machines are not fixed again. Any Federal Judge may order in Federal Marshalls to insure voting fights. I am asking The Washington Independant to publicize this over and over! Sincerely bigmikecraft
Comment posted October 29, 2008 @ 12:27 am
You all should know that constitutional protection is afforded all citizens against federal agencies. Unless the information is marked TOP SECRET, all employees have a right to speak. To deprive any American from speaking using a threat of job loss by an agency is a violation of the RICO laws. No agency shall be in aide of rackettering under 18 US 1955, ALL . Also if any citizen has knowledge of an on going crime, you may prosecute under Civil Rico General Order 34. Isn't it enough that the voting machines are not fixed again. Any Federal Judge may order in Federal Marshalls to insure voting fights. I am asking The Washington Independant to publicize this over and over! Sincerely bigmikecraft
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss