Odierno: Petraeus-Lite?
Thursday, May 22, 2008 at 10:30 am
It’s really shameful that not a single senator has asked Ray Odierno what his strategy will be for post-surge Iraq. Odierno just told Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) that he thinks Iraq is on a "path" to success, largely because of the surge. OK, fine. But what to do now that there aren’t going to be any more surge brigades in Iraq, and how to do it? Is a population-protection strategy predicated on 160,000 troops possible with, say 120,000? 100,000? No idea. No one’s asking.
Instead, Odierno dishes out Petraeus-era buzzwords. Three cheers for Maliki’s "even handedness." Al Qaeda in Iraq failed because people saw the evil future it had in store. The "enemies of Iraq will "do as much as they can" to reconstitute themselves. There’s still a ways to go, "make no mistake." That’s why we want to "build up the government forces and the capacity" for the Iraqis to succeed. It’s like he’s been reading Petraeus’s clippings and assembling cue cards.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
2 Comments
Comment posted May 22, 2008 @ 10:58 pm
Why would a responsible military person tip his strategic hand to the other side, if not forced to it by showboating civilian politicians? Strategic options are well known and thoroughly discussed already, in the professional media, but, again, why should/would a top general reveal the detailed war plan, like Ackerman wants?
Comment posted May 22, 2008 @ 5:58 pm
Why would a responsible military person tip his strategic hand to the other side, if not forced to it by showboating civilian politicians? Strategic options are well known and thoroughly discussed already, in the professional media, but, again, why should/would a top general reveal the detailed war plan, like Ackerman wants?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss