Iglesias Encouraged by Direction of U.S. Attorney Probe

By
Thursday, October 09, 2008 at 3:29 pm

Of the nine dismissals in the U.S. attorney scandal, the firing of former New Mexico U.S. Atty. David Iglesias was probably the most blatantly partisan.

A Justice Dept. inspector general report released last week concluded that Iglesias was forced to leave because he didn’t pursue public corruption and voter fraud cases that New Mexico Republicans wanted him to prosecute.

Now, 22 months after his dismissal, Iglesias said in a phone interview that the IG report vindicates his repeated assertion that he was fired for improper and possibly illegal reasons.

He also had a surprisingly upbeat assessment of where the U.S. attorney investigation will go next.

So far, neither Justice Dept. nor congressional investigators has gotten cooperation from the White House, especially former top Bush advisers Karl Rove and Harriet Miers. But Iglesias said that could change with the Justice Dept. naming a special prosecutor, acting Connecticut U.S. Atty. Nora Dannehy, to probe criminal misconduct in the firings.

“The special prosecutor has the ability to get White House documents,” Iglesias said. “If she has authority similar to what Patrick Fitzgerald [the special prosecutor in the Valerie Plame investigation] had, she’ll have a lot of power.”

Not only did Rove and Miers not answer questions from the inspector general, but the White House did not turn over documents on the attorney dismissals. But Iglesias said that by specifically citing what documents were not turned over, the IG was “signaling to the special prosecutor what evidence was still out there and what was necessary.”

Iglesias is also confident that Congress’ probe into the scandal will last into the next administration.

“[Rep.] John Conyers, [D-Mi.] has made it clear that he wants to get to the bottom of this,” Iglesias said of the House Judiciary Committee chairman. A federal appeal courts ruled this week that whether Miers can be compelled give congressional testimony cannot be decided until next year.

Iglesias said he has kept in frequent contact with other dismissed U.S. attorneys since the IG report. “There’s been a lot of email chatter back and forth… we’re pretty high-spirited” he said. “The report made crystal clear that there is a small class of reasons that you cannot use to let go of a U.S. attorney.”

If the assessments of Iglesias are accurate, Alberto Gonzales and other former Justice Dept. officials may eventually face criminal charges.

Comments

11 Comments

Johny
Comment posted January 8, 2009 @ 4:03 pm

“If the assessments of Iglesias are accurate, Alberto Gonzales and other former Justice Dept. officials may eventually face criminal charges.”

I'm not so sure about this


Healer
Comment posted January 15, 2009 @ 8:53 am

Oh, he is right ! And he will face the charges, that I am sure of !


office space
Comment posted January 26, 2009 @ 1:54 pm

I totally agree with him. If they are found guilty ,they both may face criminal charges.


David
Comment posted January 28, 2009 @ 2:08 pm

he should face it, we are sick of favorising celebrities


Busby SEO Test
Comment posted January 30, 2009 @ 11:03 am

Justice is blind, but the law enforcement shouldn't be blind. That is all I can say.


robertflock
Comment posted February 3, 2009 @ 7:50 am

who isnt ?


Nakia J Bryden
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 1:18 am

great article!, grats for u site :)


Ralph P Dickerson
Comment posted February 11, 2009 @ 12:08 am

your blog is great!


Jeffrey Rainer
Comment posted February 16, 2009 @ 2:16 pm

the article is awsome


Expungement Attorney
Comment posted February 23, 2009 @ 12:43 am

He should expunge his record.


Expungement Attorney
Comment posted February 23, 2009 @ 8:43 am

He should expunge his record.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.