GOPers offer varied support for alternative energy
Five GOP candidates for president offered very different assessments of the federal governments’ wind energy tax credit and renewable fuel standard during a forum Tuesday morning in Pella.
Those two government initiatives have paid big dividends for the Hawkeye State, spurring major growth in the wind and renewable fuels industries.
The wind energy industry employs about 3,000 people in Iowa and accounts for 20 percent of all electricity generated in the state, according to the Iowa Wind Energy Association. And the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association says biofuels support 83,000 jobs in the state, adding nearly $12 billion to Iowa’s GDP.
But some candidates said they would work to greatly limit or even do away with the programs.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry is against both wind energy tax credits and a renewable fuel standard, at least at the federal level.
“I happen to believe the federal government needs to be completely out of the energy business, picking winners and losers,” he said.
Perry said if states want to compete against each other by putting similar credits or standards in place, “that is a correct and proper role for the state.”
U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) said she’d also like to see those programs eliminated, along with subsidies for other forms of energy.
“What I would like to do is a re-examination of those credits because quite frankly I’d like to pull them back and let these industries be more self-supporting and stand on their own,” Bachmann said.
Former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Penn.) said he supports keeping a renewable fuel standard in place because of its impact on clean air. But he would like to see incentives for ethanol and other forms of energy phased out over a five-year period.
“I believe we have to get rid of all tax incentives for all energy. I believe we need to have a level playing field,” Santorum said.
At the other end of the spectrum was former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Georgia), who said he’d much rather see money for energy go to Iowa and South Dakota than overseas.
“I’d like to see some kind of encouragement for every vehicle to have flex-fuel capabilities and every gas station to be a fuel station, not just a gas station,” he said.
Gingrich also called for long term renewals of tax credits, rather than every year or two.
“I would like to see a minimum 10 years tax credits with a rolling annual renewal like football coaches,” he said. “That’s a pretty good model to keep people focused.”
U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) was also at the forum but didn’t address the topic. National frontrunners Herman Cain and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney didn’t attend the event.
No Comments
Comment posted August 15, 2011 @ 5:31 pm
Wow! As a European I was shocked to discover the staggering depth of ignorance about climate change in the USA.57% actualy believe there is still some kind of *debate* going on among the scientists?!!And what century is this? I would never have thought Americans could be so gullible as to fall for such BS.
Comment posted August 15, 2011 @ 8:06 pm
funny , july 4th warmest, but if it was the coolest month , they would call it weather not climate hahahahha, what a joke
Comment posted August 15, 2011 @ 8:08 pm
go to friends of science, there actually are thousands of scientists world wide, that are debating this, just because YOU think there is still no debate, doesnt mean that there is no debate..
as long as scientists are arguing that co2 doesnt drive climate nearly as much as others think, then there has to be more research done before a conclusion can be drawn, THAT is REAL science..
http://davidappell.blogspot.com/2011/08/arctic-ice-melt-might-pause.html
Comment posted August 15, 2011 @ 8:39 pm
Ask one of these End-of-the-World Fundies led by the Evangelical Creationist Al Gore, why – after the past 100 years’ ever upward raging manmade gases, a recent 14 year-long study of atmospheric infra-red shows LESS, and ask them why the ASTOUNDING SILENCE from the infra-red telescopy field as allegedly, CO2 is trapping infra red like mad: but none of their instruments’ times of viewing or quality of viewing is ever noted as impacted.
Ask a warmer why it is that since HEAT on GAS is DEFINED as MOTION, the optical telescopy field isn’t screaming bloody murder about ever rising distortion in the atmosphere as they try to look up through it.
Atmospheric scintillation – the STARS TWINKLING over these peoples’ heads: is the MOTION that is MANDATORY to added HEAT in the atmosphere.
There’s a REASON no student or professor has simply trotted out the photos of sections of the sky through the years showing ever higher MANDATORY ATMOSPHERIC DISTORTION through MOTION.
Ask these warmers, why they think the people who maintain the assemblies which FLEX telescope MIRRORS to OFFSET HEAT DISTORTION are completely SILENT: WHY they aren’t coming forth saying “when we first built these mirror flexing assemblies we had to move the mirror X but now with ever rising HEAT DISTORTION mandatory to G.H.G. Hypothesis, we have to flex the mirrors MORE…
The resounding SILENCE from all these fields prove all you need to know: if the heat was there it woudn’t be able to be hidden from the infra-red and optical telescopy field.
Comment posted August 15, 2011 @ 8:53 pm
Basic physics is in operation here, only question is how fast and bad it will be?
Actually, if we continue burning every last bit of fossil fuels that last question has been answered…game over.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss