Personhood battles continue in new year with Republican legislatures

Florida considered most likely to pass measure that would ban abortion, consider zygotes as persons
Thursday, December 30, 2010 at 11:46 am

A favorable enthusiasm gap heading into the 2010 midterm elections signaled a marquee year for Republicans and conservative interest groups across the country. That gap came by way of liberals disappointed by congressional inaction and conservatives revitalized by the tea party movement. On November 3, conservatives woke up to success everywhere: historic gains in the U.S. House, a significant dent in the Democrats’ majority in the U.S. Senate and many Republican-controlled state legislatures and governors’ mansions across the country.

But one side of the conservative coalition received disappointing results: anti-choice advocates. For example, in advance of the midterms, conservative organizations had invested in Colorado as the national battleground for the fight over choice with Amendment 62, or the Personhood amendment.

Personhood is a term that conservative groups have taken to using, arguing that life needs to be defined, essentially, at the most original point possible, starting with the zygote and calling it a person. The restrictions of such amendments like Colorado’s have major implications on a woman’s legal right to choose: If personhood were codified into law, not only would all forms of abortion become illegal, but stem cell research would be banned and women would no longer have access to certain forms of birth control. However, any personhood law would likely be immediately subject to judicial review; though the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed for restrictions on various forms of abortions, a complete ban on all abortions goes far beyond any current legal precedent.

National organization Personhood USA and other conservatives focused on Colorado as “ground zero” for pushing the issue in 2010. Amendment 62 was on the ballot for voters to decide whether to implement personhood measures. According to records with the Colorado Secretary of State’s office, Personhood USA’s state branch spent over $72,000 in expenditures during the campaign cycle. The American Independent’s sister site The Colorado Independent reported during the campaign:

[Personhood Colorado Director Gualberto Garcia] Jones agreed that Colorado is a battleground state, but he said that’s true of a host of issues, including personhood. He pointed to a blend of “East Coast liberal values” and “Mid-West family values” found in the state as the cause and added that the campaign has learned lessons from Colorado it will carry on to other states.

Jones, who is also part of the leadership of Personhood USA, said the Colorado initiative has taught them that the key to a successful campaign is grassroots organizing.

“There is that idea of trickle-down economics; well, I think that this is like trickle up politics,” Jones said. “When you are formidable, politicians will come on board. Some will peel away, but most of them realize that their base is our people.”

Yet the measure failed resoundingly. Voters rejected the measure by an overwhelming 73-27 percent margin. In Denver, the amendment received only slightly more support than a measure to institute a commission exploring extraterrestrial life.

Fight for personhood starts anew in different states

However, the overwhelming defeat of the personhood amendment in Colorado has not deterred proponents from pursuing similar strategies in other states. According to Personhood USA, action on personhood legislation is occurring in 30 states.

Florida may be the prime location for upcoming battles over personhood. Republicans made major gains during the 2010 midterms, sweeping many elections across the state. Personhood Florida is currently beginning efforts to get a measure similar to the Colorado amendment on the ballot in 2012.

In order for a constitutional amendment to get on the ballot in Florida, the group must collect over 676,000 signatures. Personhood Florida had collected zero signatures as of earlier this month, but the organization is gearing up for a major push to raise the issue early in 2011.

“We’re planning our big push for January. … We hope that pastors will have a pro-life sermon … and include information about the Personhood Amendment and give attendants a chance to sign the petition,” Pastor Bryan Longworth said in an interview with The Florida Independent.

The group is now talking beyond the base-level of signatures required. “We are seeking 1 million signatures, because we realize that some will likely be discounted. And we need 3.5 million people to vote on it, for it to pass. We aren’t backing down from the requirements and I appreciate the difficulty of the task ahead,” Longworth said.

Even if the group fails to gain the required number of signatures, they could approach Republicans in the state legislature to bypass the signature process to get the amendment on the ballot.

“That is definitely one route we could take, but at this point aren’t looking to go in that direction. We are, however, asking legislators to sponsor a Personhood Act, which wouldn’t carry the same weight as an amendment, but would be helpful nonetheless,” Longworth told The Florida Independent.

And that route may be more difficult than one may expect from a newly empowered Republican legislature, as even staunch anti-choice members have questioned the validity of pushing the personhood concept rather than working toward more gradual restrictions on abortion.

Battles beyond personhood

Of course, not all debates in the states over choice will revolve around measures as extreme as personhood. With a wide swath of state legislatures in the GOP’s control beginning in January, Republicans across the country will have a new opportunity to subtly create laws restricting access to abortion.

At TAI’s sister site The Minnesota Independent, Andy Birkey reported on concerns from Minnesota pro-choice organizations. Republicans took over both the Minnesota House and Senate after previous Democratic majorities. Personhood is likely too conservative for Minnesota’s more socially-liberal citizenry, but that doesn’t comfort pro-choice groups in the state.

“They have so many things in their arsenal to use — starting with an outright ban on certain types of abortion procedures (saline abortions have been a favorite target in the past) to banning abortion insurance coverage in the still- to-be-developed health care exchanges, to preventing any state funding to go to organizations that provide, refer or support abortions, to overturning the Doe v. Gomez case, which provides funding for abortions for women on Medicaid,” Linnea House of NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota told Birkey.

At the same time, as Republicans took both sides of Minnesota’s legislature, the governor’s mansion flipped from Republican to Democrat, with Gov.-elect Mark Dayton a supporter of a woman’s right to choose. Nevertheless, GOPers still have other opportunities to restrict abortion access, such as a constitutional amendment, which would require a popular vote.



Comment posted December 31, 2010 @ 5:21 am

If a zygote is a person, then a zygote can sue.

Comment posted December 31, 2010 @ 9:26 am

Can a neonate sue? Or a two year old?
And to the author: “stem cell research” includes adult stem cells from bone marrow, fat, skin, etc., as well as cells from umbilical cord blood, the placenta, and other tissues that can be harvested without ending a life.

Comment posted December 31, 2010 @ 8:56 pm

It seems to me that the problem is not in defining personhood — that might be an excellent thing, esp. if it excluded corporations. The problem is in HOW personhood is defined. It might be a great idea for us to have a constitutional amendment, if only we could get some reasonable definition, but therein lies the rub. Maybe we liberals should preempt the “personhood” meme and use it to make clear that corporate entities don’t qualify?

Comment posted January 2, 2011 @ 8:06 am

While this is an absolutist evangelo-fascist attack of womens right to choose, it may if ratified, prove a double-edged sword that will behead the Republibaggers greatest benefactors. A defined personhood would, with applied the applied logic of law, require overturning the decision of Citizens United v. FEC. as business entities could not possibly be considered persons within the parameters of biological context; and therefore could be denied the rights of persons detailed in the constitution. While ultimately, the personhood battle would be lost in attempting to assert uber-christian ethics into laws regulating the practice of medicine, the side issue making the argument for overturning CU v. FEC should be solid. It is also likely that in a review of its own ruling, the Supreme Court would require the recusal of Justice Thomas for personal bias; something he should have been inpeached and removed from the court for regardless of any future considerations.

The coming war on women | Anti American
Pingback posted January 2, 2011 @ 2:12 pm

[...] the Washington Independent reported: With a wide swath of state legislatures in the GOP’s [...]

Bags Watches
Comment posted January 6, 2011 @ 7:11 am

Name brand products is a pronoun of luxury in many people’s mind. So I guess you definitely know that is why so many Replica watches and Replica handbags appears on the online market. Let us talk about Replica watches at first. IWC replica watches is very famous in the world maket, an original Replica watches or Replica handbags may will cost you several hundred thousand money. But for the ordinary people, buy Replica watches and Swiss replica watches is the only way for them to show their love on the famous brand watches and handbags. They can learn more about Replica Officine Panerai watches through buying the replicas. And it is easy for them to get the first-hand information about the Omega replica watches as well. Don’t think all the Replica watches are very cheap. Top quality Tag Heuer replica watches also can cost you several hundreds US dollars. 1:1 U-BOAT replica watches are very hot.Atually, we can say all the 1:1 imitations are the most popular replica watches now. You may be can get a Franck Muller replica watch with 20-30 dollars. But in my opinion, that is a way of wasting money, due to the quality is very nonideal. It is not valuable. Swiss replica watches all our replica watches is high quality.Cheap Miu Miu handbags and Dolce & Gabbana replica handbags are here and there as well. Though they have the same appearance with the original ones, but the quality of the leather are really bad. Some of them are even not the real leather. Here is a good news for you. All the designer handbags on our site are made of real leather and they are in very competitive price now. Compare with the same quality Versace replica handbags, Givenchy replica handbags and Mulberry replica handbags,they have very considerable discount price. Why not choosing a style of excellent Chloe replica handbags as a suprising gift to your love at Christmas Day? If you don’t hurry up, you will miss this god-given chance.

The coming war on women
Pingback posted January 6, 2011 @ 3:49 pm

[...] the Washington Independent reported: With a wide swath of state legislatures in the GOP’s control beginning in January, Republicans [...]

coach outlet online
Comment posted January 8, 2011 @ 3:00 am

I can see that you are putting a lot of time and effort into your blog and detailed articles! I am deeply in love with every single piece of information you post here. Will be back often to read more updates!

Comment posted January 8, 2011 @ 9:39 pm

this seems to be something that no matter what the definition is there will still be those that disagree with and the argument just goes on and on and on. So that being the case and women want the right to do with thier bodies no problem as long as I do not have to pay for it and as long as it does not infringe my parental rights with my daughter other than that its just going to be one of those never ending arguments .. Santa Maria Homes For Sale

Comment posted January 10, 2011 @ 1:17 am

These are wonderful! Thank you for sharing
Wholesale NFL jerseys

Comment posted January 10, 2011 @ 9:59 pm

If a zygote could sue, then so could a child. Imagine this brave new world of “personhood” in which children sue their parents for all kinds of grievances.

And maybe while we’re at it we can define them to exclude corporations. After all, that couldn’t possibly be in the original intent of the constitution since it took over 225 years for jurisprudence to decide so.

Regardless, isn’t sexual pleasure a gift from god? Why then, do humans seek to limit the enjoyment of it?
Trackback posted January 17, 2011 @ 3:01 pm

Here’s the information that you WON’T find in any e-book, CD/DVD, or a guru seminar.. THE BIG FOREX CONSPIRACY…

I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…

Comment posted January 20, 2011 @ 12:34 pm

At birth you are considered a Person. But, when you are given or apply for a ssn you become a person under the fourteenth amendment. verb: to call, name, or entitle one. noun: appellation or title of a Person (Blacks Law dictionary 4th Ed.). So, when you have an ssn you are named. Only persons are named. Remember, only former slaves were persons. Citizens of the states were Persons.

business management
Trackback posted February 16, 2011 @ 10:24 am

I would like to say “wow” what a inspiring post. This is really great. Keep doing what you’re doing!!…

Intriguing post. I have been searching for some good resources for solar panels and discovered your blog. Planning to bookmark this one!…

business management
Trackback posted February 16, 2011 @ 8:44 pm

I’ve just started off a blog, the knowledge you give on this site has aided me extremely. Thank you for all your time & work….

Of course, what a great site and informative posts, I will add backlink – bookmark this site? Regards, Reader…

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.